Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Daily US News

Channel

Daily US News

@daily_news_american

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,132subscribers

-356 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001000093690
TypeChannel
Username@daily_news_american
Created30 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/daily_news_american

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

20,13220,48820,3105 August 2026 — 20,488 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,488 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,472 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,466 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,468 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,461 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,463 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,446 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,453 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,456 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,465 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,463 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,450 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,430 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,406 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,395 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,383 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,364 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,351 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,339 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,324 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,320 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,315 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,297 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,293 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,283 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,278 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,275 subscribers4 September 2026 — 20,248 subscribers7 September 2026 — 20,243 subscribers10 September 2026 — 20,223 subscribers12 September 2026 — 20,206 subscribers14 September 2026 — 20,190 subscribers16 September 2026 — 20,163 subscribers18 September 2026 — 20,132 subscribers5 August 202618 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -356. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,079–20,541 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 09:0120,132-31
16 Sept 2026, 01:3820,163-27
14 Sept 2026, 06:5820,190-16
12 Sept 2026, 12:5720,206-17
10 Sept 2026, 08:5520,223-20
7 Sept 2026, 00:3720,243-5
4 Sept 2026, 07:1520,248-27
2 Sept 2026, 21:3920,275-3
1 Sept 2026, 18:0520,278-5
31 Aug 2026, 18:2620,283-10
30 Aug 2026, 17:2320,293-4
29 Aug 2026, 16:4920,297-18
28 Aug 2026, 14:4520,315-5
27 Aug 2026, 18:0820,320-4
26 Aug 2026, 14:2820,324-15
25 Aug 2026, 16:1320,339-12
24 Aug 2026, 14:5520,351-13
23 Aug 2026, 01:4320,364-19
21 Aug 2026, 14:2520,383-12
20 Aug 2026, 15:5320,395first reading

Engagement

204 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.32%
avg views ÷ 20,132 subscribers
Avg views / post
266
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 204 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held204 (4 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total10,102
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 02:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 31s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

115 reactions across 43 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9986.1%
👎1613.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 204 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 204 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:43 UTC148 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

🚨 President Trump just asked if the Strait of Hormuz should be renamed Trump Strait. He said the waterway is now under U.S. control. His punchline: like America itself, it would be hotter than ever.

  1. Yes40%
  2. No60%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 13:54 UTC221 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📍 Tensions between US and Islamic republic escalated again Tensions between the United States and Islamic republic have escalated once again after President Donald Trump issued a fresh warning to Tehran 🇺🇸🇮🇷. With negotiations remaining stalled over uranium stockpiles, sanctions relief, and compensation for war-related damages following months of unrest across West Asia.

👍3

1 Sept 2026, 16:45 UTC341 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Journalist Maggie Haberman directly refuted Trump's claims on TV after his personal attacks, stating no polls show him popular or not in trouble on affordability. This timely response, despite Trump's "Maggot Hagerman" insults, highlights her commitment to factual reporting. Haberman's factual statements, backed by a CNN poll showing Trump's -32 approval rating, are hitting Trump hard. Stand with Maggie! ❤️

👍5

1 Sept 2026, 16:15 UTC330 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Hunter Biden claims Trump's hatred for Joe stems from seeing a loving father he can't be. Hunter alleges Trump lacks capacity for love or empathy, treating his own sons poorly. The message contrasts this with Joe Biden's supportive fatherhood, portraying Trump as a narcissistic failure obsessed with money and power, alienating his children. Republicans are allegedly enraged by this comparison.

1 Sept 2026, 15:34 UTC303 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

MapQuest bravely refused Trump's "Lake America" renaming stunt for Lake Ontario. Their app surged to #1 in navigation after standing up to the order, unlike Google Maps which caved. Users are showing love by downloading MapQuest, demonstrating that rejecting such moves is rewarded. Share to thank MapQuest for their courage! #data#

👍4

1 Sept 2026, 02:41 UTC347 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

AOC brilliantly shut down Trump's "poor" jab about data centers. She suggested putting one at Mar-a-Lago, a perfectly pointed response. She's incredibly effective at this!

31 Aug 2026, 22:23 UTC341 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

House Democrats are blocking Trump's absurd "Lake America" renaming attempt, a win for the American people! This legislation protects our shared Great Lakes, a natural treasure. Thank you for your support in fighting this ridiculous proposal.

31 Aug 2026, 21:37 UTC285 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Hasan Piker delivers a powerful takedown of Trump's presidency, highlighting why Republicans fear him. This progressive streamer's insightful critique reveals the flaws in Trump's tenure. The media's silence speaks volumes about the impact of his message.

31 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC198 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Trump has redirected all funds from his Texas visit, meant for Ken Paxton, to the national Republican Party instead. This move leaves Paxton, a MAGA candidate, without the expected financial support.

31 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC268 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Donald Trump's "Let Data Reign!" declaration insults voters who oppose data centers, calling them "backwards and poor." This out-of-touch statement dismisses community concerns, prioritizing data infrastructure over local well-being.

31 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC244 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Abdul El-Sayed brilliantly exposes media BS surrounding Hasan Piker, proving his MAGA opponent "has nothing to say." El-Sayed masterfully flips a bad faith narrative, demonstrating how to counter baseless attacks and focus on substantive issues. This approach cuts through noise and reclaims the narrative.

31 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC255 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ICE plans to spend up to $2 million of your tax dollars on "robot dogs" for masked, lawless enforcers to terrorize communities. This dystopian measure, akin to sci-fi, is detailed in a new DHS funding document.

Showing the 12 most recent of 204 posts we hold for @daily_news_american. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 17:43 UTCAnonymous Poll25 voters

🚨 President Trump just asked if the Strait of Hormuz should be renamed Trump Strait. He said the waterway is now under U.S. control. His punchline: like America itself, it would be hotter than ever.

  1. Yes40%
  2. No60%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 204 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

America 🇺🇸 News & Politics
@america · 37,575
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
The American Spectator
@AmericanSpectator · 42,870
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Canada 🇨🇦 News & Life
@canada · 26,675
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
Elon Musk
@musk_elon · 45,693
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
Elon Musk
@elon_musk · 75,183
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Dubai
@dubai · 105,230
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 August 2026
PHYSIOTHERAPY BOOKS_WPO
@physiotherapy_books_wpo · 33,224
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 17 September 2026
Mission Railway Exams™
@Mission_Railway_Exams · 322
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026
Active English ™
@actives_english · 28,850
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Daily US News” (@daily_news_american), 20,132 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daily_news_american.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.