Channel
@american
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9,071subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002035263790 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @american |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/american |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 18:51 | 9,071 | -8 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:34 | 9,079 | +20 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:55 | 9,059 | +15 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:38 | 9,044 | +2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:39 | 9,042 | -3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 12:12 | 9,045 | +6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 10:15 | 9,039 | +4 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:18 | 9,035 | -11 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 18:55 | 9,046 | -19 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 07:19 | 9,065 | +12 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 9,053 | -5 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:42 | 9,058 | -7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 9,065 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 9,068 | -9 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 9,077 | +5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:13 | 9,072 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 9,077 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 9,074 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 9,071 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 9,074 | first reading |
136 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 39 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 136 (27 July 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 34,815 |
| Reactions total | 160 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 23:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 75 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
437 reactions across 105 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 180 | 41.2% | |
| 👍 | 130 | 29.7% | |
| 🔥 | 90 | 20.6% | |
| 👏 | 27 | 6.18% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 2.29% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 107 of the 136 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 446 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 136 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @american. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 136 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 48 posts held from the last 30 days (22.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
“We don’t work for the global order. We don’t work for other countries, we work for the United States.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio makes his position clear, saying American interests will always come first, even when that puts the U.S. at odds with other nations, including China.
❤4
Do you support the impeachment of Hegseth?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥5
“That you think only people from Great Britain or Australia would speak English is so insulting to millions of hardworking immigrants who do speak English from all over the world.” As Stephen Miller steps into his new role as White House chief of staff, his fiery 2017 clash with CNN’s Jim Acosta is resurfacing. During a briefing on a proposed immigration overhaul, Miller challenged Acosta’s questioning about Englis…
❤5
"They deserve nothing less than victory." War Secretary Pete Hegseth delivers a pointed message to students and faculty at the U.S. Naval War College, declaring that Americans don't send their sons and daughters into uniform to lose or withdraw. Hegseth calls on military educators to renew their commitment to training future leaders, urging them to "reclaim the warrior ethos" and "teach victory."
👏2
#promo
This is one of the best channels for technical analysis They have been trading for over eight years and have built a massive community by leveraging their experience and expertise. If you want to know which coins to buy for the upcoming bull run, don't miss this chance Join → https://t.me/+5jdz0OBYhYY0MzIy
Former President Joe Biden says his battle with cancer is forcing him to scale back plans for a promotional tour of his upcoming presidential memoir. "Some days are better than others. It hasn't stopped me. But sometimes it slows me down," the 83-year-old writes, acknowledging he won't be able to make as many appearances as he had hoped. Biden was diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer that spread to …
❤4
BREAKING: U.S. Central Command is launching a new task force aimed at stopping Iran from moving advanced weapons and other materials along ground transit routes. CENTCOM Commander Adm. Brad Cooper has ordered the formation of Task Force Iron Gate, which will support ongoing U.S. government efforts to prevent the movement of weapons and sanctioned materials across Iran's borders. |
❤9
From New York City to Los Angeles, socialist mayors are gaining control of some of America's biggest city halls. Tuesday's elections added two more major cities to the list, with Nithya Raman unseating Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and Janeese Lewis George winning in the nation's capital. That brings the total to four of the country’s 20 most populous cities with socialist leaders at the helm. Together, those cities…
🔥6
Bernie Sanders is giving President Trump some unexpected credit. During an interview on MS NOW Thursday, the Vermont senator acknowledged Trump’s political instincts while suggesting the president might be willing to sign legislation backed by Democrats. “Our job is to produce it. He wants to veto it. Republicans want to sustain that veto. That is their responsibility, and the American people will see it.”
👍8
BAD BLOOD: The New York Knicks are defending Taylor Swift after one of their own players questioned whether she’s really a fan. Guard Tyler Kolek called Taylor Swift’s Knicks support “very performative” during a livestream when asked to name the fakest celebrity fan at Madison Square Garden. “Taylor Swift has been a Knicks fan for many years, has a long history with Madison Square Garden, and we are incredibly appr…
🔥6
“Michigan is the capital of Arab America.” Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed makes the claim during remarks in Washington, D.C., pointing to Michigan’s large Arab American population.
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 136 posts we hold for @american. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do you support the impeachment of Hegseth?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you support ICE activities?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which party will win the Texas ?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Have you voted ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 136 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@american named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“American” (@american), 9,071 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/american.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.