Posted without readable text

Channel
Earth, Galaxy, Universe
@ourearthgalaxy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,548subscribers
-256 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001957913605 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ourearthgalaxy |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ourearthgalaxy |
Topic
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 08:35 | 11,548 | -74 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 11,622 | -10 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 11,632 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 11,630 | -13 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 11,643 | -18 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 11,661 | -14 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 11,675 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 11,677 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:08 | 11,682 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 11,687 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 11,696 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:49 | 11,705 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 11,714 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 11,717 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 11,721 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 11,727 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 11,737 | -9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 11,746 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 11,751 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 11,757 | first reading |
Engagement
86 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 86 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
195 reactions across 60 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 55 | 28.2% | |
| ❤ | 45 | 23.1% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 19.5% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 18.5% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 3.08% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 1.54% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 1.54% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.513% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.513% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.513% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⭐According to information published by the TV channel NHK, the Japanese research module SLIM plans to land on the Moon around January 20, 2024. Before this, the device will be launched into orbit of the Earth's natural satellite at the end of December, after which specialists from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) will conduct a series of checks and adjustments to its course before starting its descent t…
🤨3🗿2
NASA and Boeing report significant progress in the preparation of the first manned flight of the Starliner spacecraft, the launch of which is tentatively scheduled for mid-April this year. Specialists have completed the analysis of data collected during recent tests of the upgraded parachute system, and also solved some other technical problems that were identified during the test unmanned flight in 2022. If the wo…
❤2👍1
On a dark, clear night, you can easily see the dusty white streak of stars stretching across the sky. This is the Milky Way galaxy, a massive cluster of stars, dust and gas clouds. The Milky Way contains hundreds of billions of stars. It's just one of the billions of galaxies in the universe. 🧙♂ 👩 #Fact ⚡ #Daily ⚡ #Space Subscribe
👍1
💫On January 21, 2024 a meter-long asteroid 2024 BX1 burned in the sky over Berlin. And this event was predicted in advance! Hungarian observer Christian Scharnecki discovered this object and predicted a collision three hours before the body entered the atmosphere. Despite the short period, many European observatories managed to prepare and make observations. The asteroid belongs to the near-Earth objects of the A…
❤2
Posted without readable text
🔥2❤1
An error in the first light theory Modern models say that Population III stars (the first stars) should have been giants, burning out in millions of years. But spectral anomalies force us to rethink this scenario. If stars like SMSS J0313-6708 exist, it means the first stars could have been much smaller and longer-lived than previously thought. Or the process of enriching the cosmos with heavy elements was much mor…
⚡3❤2
Posted without readable text
👍1
NASA’s Parker Solar Probe is still edging closer to the sun than any other spacecraft has ever achieved, and it’s setting new speed records in the process. According to a recent status update from the space agency, the Parker Solar Probe has broken its own record (again) for the fastest thing ever made by human hands—at an astounding clip of 394,736 mph. 🧙♂ 👩 #Fact ⚡ #Daily ⚡ #Space Subscribe
👍2
When Universes Collide The multiverse theory is often dismissed as mere speculation, but the Cold Spot provides a tangible lead. If our universe is expanding, it could eventually intersect with other "bubble" worlds in the cosmic landscape. Such collisions would leave energetic imprints in the background radiation, acting as cosmic footprints. This turns the search for parallel realities from a philosophical debat…
⚡3
Posted without readable text
❤1
The stars die so beautifully! James Webb continues to delight us with amazing photos of deep space! This new super-high resolution image allows you to view the remnant of a supernova flare in the constellation of Cassiopeia called Cassiopeia A (Cas A). An almost circular cloud of gas and dust of complex structure with curtains of thin gas, similar to the smoke of a campfire Tiny clumps of gas consisting of sulfur,…
⚡2❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @ourearthgalaxy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nasapictures · 25,136
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
@Tech_Science_Innovation · 37,981
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
@apod_telegram · 35,184
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
@EzCinema · 205,394
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 11 August 2026
@journeys · 24,970
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 September 2026
@earthcurated · 28,058
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 September 2026
@painting · 41,439
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
@science · 120,230
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@askmenow · 68,981
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
@books · 215,785
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
@Old_History_Photos · 35,676
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 September 2026
@motivation202300 · 28,399
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 9 September 2026
@physics · 33,183
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026
@JEEAdvanced_2026 · 20,214
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 28 September 2026
@sportlife · 25,307
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 September 2026
@tgscience_facts · 34,306
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
@intfactsen · 22,591
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
@eBookRoom · 333,607
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 August 2026
@guvigeek · 26,890
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 11 September 2026
@Audiobooks_collection · 30,712
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 6 September 2026
@everything_science · 32,033
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 5 September 2026
@bookshub25 · 276,552
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
@General_KnowledgeTM · 69,163
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
@tipsforgood · 20,070
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 45 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Earth, Galaxy, Universe” (@ourearthgalaxy), 11,548 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ourearthgalaxy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.