Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -2,182. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 98,629–101,465 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 03:07
98,956
-6
9 Nov 2026, 13:48
98,962
-26
8 Nov 2026, 09:06
98,988
-36
7 Nov 2026, 00:37
99,024
-26
6 Nov 2026, 02:55
99,050
-34
5 Nov 2026, 02:45
99,084
-18
4 Nov 2026, 00:46
99,102
-39
2 Nov 2026, 22:28
99,141
-7
1 Nov 2026, 18:57
99,148
-51
31 Oct 2026, 20:00
99,199
-22
30 Oct 2026, 18:31
99,221
-34
29 Oct 2026, 16:06
99,255
-40
28 Oct 2026, 14:17
99,295
-44
27 Oct 2026, 11:30
99,339
-37
26 Oct 2026, 14:58
99,376
-27
25 Oct 2026, 12:56
99,403
-23
24 Oct 2026, 10:44
99,426
-29
23 Oct 2026, 09:50
99,455
-38
22 Oct 2026, 06:47
99,493
-47
20 Oct 2026, 20:46
99,540
first reading
Engagement
464 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 253 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.46%
avg views ÷ 98,956 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,410
125 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
126
of 464 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 123 of 125 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
464 (3 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
551,170
Reactions total
6,892
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Nov 2026, 21:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 35s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26,524 reactions across 453 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
18,123
68.3%
🔥
1,962
7.40%
💯
1,560
5.88%
👏
1,244
4.69%
👍
1,185
4.47%
❤🔥
712
2.68%
🙏
487
1.84%
🕊
361
1.36%
😍
194
0.731%
😢
159
0.599%
🤩
94
0.354%
⚡
92
0.347%
🤣
76
0.287%
🥰
65
0.245%
👌
46
0.173%
🎉
23
0.087%
👎
22
0.083%
🥱
18
0.068%
💔
17
0.064%
🏆
16
0.06%
11 further kinds
68
0.256%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 459 of the 464 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,812 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 464 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 126 posts held from the last 30 days (1.59%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
4 things you can’t take back in life:
•Words after they’re said
•Moments after they’re missed
•Actions after they’re done
•Time after it’s gone
So choose to be careful of what you say, what you do, & what you let pass by. You may not be able to get it back.
-WordsToLiveBy
#weird_factsTM
You are born with a will that is stronger than your emotions. You can choose how you act no matter how you feel.
If life is great and you are feeling good, get working on your goals.
If life sucks and you don’t feel so good, get working on your goals.
#mq_quotes
How to Make Life More Positive:
1) Smile more
2) Be yourself
3) Be optimistic
4) Don’t complain
5) Throw away clutter
6) Make a change/difference
7) Unfollow negative people on social media
8) Go to bed early & wake up early
9) Show more gratitude
10) Do things that challenge you
#mq_quotes
No matter how good a person you are,
some will hate you.
Don't worry.
People often create their own drama out of jealousy.
Just ignore them.
#mq_quotes
You never know how much time left you have with someone you love.
Be kind, be caring, and stop worrying about things that don’t matter.
#mq_quotes
❤49👍6🔥6👏3🙏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 464 posts we hold for @mqquotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 65 posts on @mqquotes as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
30 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
18
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Deep Thoughts @deepthoughts2 · 22,635 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 19 September 2026
Buzz 💬 Quotes @buzzquotes · 27,060 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 September 2026
INSPIRATION TIPS™ @InspirationTipsTM · 77,958 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
English Life Quotes & Facts @English_Life_Quotes_and_Facts · 44,200 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
Motivational Quotes Thoughts Status @Motivational_Quotes_Thoughts · 93,386 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
Inspiration Attitude @rich_motivational_quotes · 70,611 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Quotes @Quotes · 81,576 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
Quote — motivation, wisdom, inspiration @quote · 116,986 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Quotes Collection • Quotes Archive • Book Snippets @Audiobooks_collection · 30,242 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 6 September 2026
Think Positive Words @thinkpositivewords · 35,626 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 September 2026
Psychology Todays @Psycho_Todays · 44,271 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
Learn Everyday | Facts @LearnEvery_Day · 47,813 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
💭 Motivational Quotes @Quotes_Facts_English_Motivation · 127,725 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Business Lessons™ @Business_Idea4 · 39,227 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 30 August 2026
Feelings ― Soul Lines @Myfeelings_TM · 83,068 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
LIFE TIPS @the_life_tips · 113,576 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
MEN MONEY MINDSET 📚💼 @Men_Money_Mindset · 67,654 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
PSYCHO W🌍RLD ® @Psycho_Motivations · 109,356 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
Motivation and Psychology @motivation202300 · 28,447 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 9 September 2026
Quotery | Quotes | Love | Life @Quotery · 34,243 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 2 September 2026
𝐒𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 + 𝐖𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐡™ @SerenityWealth · 66,862 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Infinity ∞ Thoughts @feelingsworldx · 90,500 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Quotes ― Thoughts @Sad_quotes_Thoughts · 110,646 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
Business Todays @Business_Todays · 19,303 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 3 October 2026
This channel appears in 110 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Quotes ― motivational quotes 💭” (@mqquotes), 98,956 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mqquotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.