Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ReHold | Multichain Trading

Channel

ReHold | Multichain Trading

@rehold_io

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,622subscribers

-272 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001508958078
TypeChannel
Username@rehold_io
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rehold_io

Growth

17,62217,89417,7587 August 2026 — 17,894 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,894 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,891 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,878 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,871 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,857 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,841 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,835 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,829 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,814 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,787 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,775 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,758 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,742 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,739 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,724 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,703 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,681 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,659 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,644 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,638 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,622 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 21 days, net -272. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,581–17,935 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 14:2517,622-16
27 Aug 2026, 14:5317,638-6
26 Aug 2026, 15:1217,644-15
25 Aug 2026, 13:5717,659-22
24 Aug 2026, 15:5717,681-22
22 Aug 2026, 23:2317,703-21
21 Aug 2026, 15:1417,724-15
20 Aug 2026, 14:5117,739-3
19 Aug 2026, 17:5417,742-16
18 Aug 2026, 16:1317,758-17
17 Aug 2026, 18:5817,775-12
16 Aug 2026, 18:3517,787-27
15 Aug 2026, 05:1817,814-15
13 Aug 2026, 18:2717,829-6
12 Aug 2026, 19:0617,835-6
11 Aug 2026, 18:3217,841-16
10 Aug 2026, 18:2817,857-14
9 Aug 2026, 21:5117,871-7
8 Aug 2026, 18:4217,878-13
7 Aug 2026, 18:2317,891first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 37s
Average length
2m 37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

183 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9551.9%
3820.8%
🔥189.84%
158.20%
🌭116.01%
👎63.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2024 to 8 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Nov 2024, 11:59 UTC≈4,180 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Renat Gafarov has now laundered all stolen funds (over $200,000) through Tornado Cash, fully obscuring their origin. In a strange move, he once again sent a small transaction of $132 to Michael Semin’s wallet, possibly as a continued attempt to mislead or defame him. https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x6930C0eF40A7610900e8164eddd0C5F2e811C794 We’re closely monitoring the situation and will keep updating the

7👍4🌭3👎3

5 Nov 2024, 18:37 UTC≈2,850 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Renat Gafarov has started moving stolen funds through Tornado Cash, a known mixing service often used to obscure transaction trails. This move indicates an attempt to hide his tracks and complicate the tracing of funds, despite the high risk of his addresses being flagged or blacklisted. It’s important to note that by using Tornado Cash, Renat is violating multiple laws, including international Anti-Money Launderi

👍6🌭42

5 Nov 2024, 14:35 UTC≈2,150 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Update about the situation involving Renat Gafarov. He has not responded to any emails or messages despite multiple attempts. He's hiding from police interrogation. Additionally, it appears he has started laundering stolen funds through DeFi protocols, converting them into Ethereum. Alarmingly, he has sent small transactions to Michael Semin’s personal wallet, seemingly as an attempt to defame him — an absurd move,

👍54

9 Oct 2024, 11:28 UTC≈3,070 views27 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

URGENT ANNOUNCEMENT: DO NOT USE THE PROTOCOL. Renat Gafarov has stolen $190,000 of client funds by using unauthorized access to our Cloudflare account and ReHold admin panel. He transferred the funds to the wallet address: 0x6930c0ef40a7610900e8164eddd0c5f2e811c794, after which he revoked administrative access for [email protected], effectively paralyzing the company. As a result, clients can no longer withdraw th

👍146🌭4👎3

7 Oct 2024, 13:59 UTC≈2,010 views26 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Dear ReHold community, Our team has filed several official complaints with Cloudflare, Discord, Twitter, and other platforms to regain control of our domain rehold.io, which was wrongfully taken over by a former partner. We need your support to raise awareness! Please help us by retweeting our post to get Cloudflare’s attention: https://x.com/michael_rehold/status/1843288347063517341 Thank you for standing with u

15👍74

2 Oct 2024, 17:46 UTC≈2,480 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026

📢 Dear ReHold community, The ReHold protocol continues to operate smoothly on https://app.reholdio.com All trading features are fully functional, with deposits and withdrawals working seamlessly, and our financial commitments are guaranteed. The ReHold team is striving for a peaceful resolution and working diligently to regain access to the original domain and social media channels.

👍115

26 Sept 2024, 13:48 UTC≈2,700 views19 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🚨 The situation with the misappropriation of money by Renat Gafarov is gaining publicity! Where is the truth? 👇 ✅ https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/2024-09-26-rehold-ceo-allegedly-withdraws-700-000-without-approval-14061268231921 ✅ https://www.odaily.news/en/newsflash/392919 ✅ https://x.com/BlockInsider_/status/1839287770495295517 🛡️ The ReHold team remains in its position to ensure the continued protection o

👍19

25 Sept 2024, 23:02 UTCviews —

ReHold | Multichain Trading pinned «🚨 Important Update from ReHold 🚨 On July 15, 2024, Renat Gafarov, our co-founder, withdrew over $700,000 from the company’s smart contracts without prior agreement from both founders. Despite this, client funds remain safe (the team revoked his access to…»

25 Sept 2024, 23:02 UTC≈3,380 views24 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🚨 Important Update from ReHold 🚨 On July 15, 2024, Renat Gafarov, our co-founder, withdrew over $700,000 from the company’s smart contracts without prior agreement from both founders. Despite this, client funds remain safe (the team revoked his access to smart contracts), and the protocol continues to function normally. We’ve also moved to a new domain: https://app.reholdio.com because Renat revoked the team access

👍183🔥3

24 Sept 2024, 09:59 UTC≈1,710 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

The 10% 🔼 price 🔽 change in $SHIB last week shows how quickly the market moves. With x100 leverage and instant execution, ReHold makes sure ✅ you’re always ready to trade and capitalize on those movements. 🔗 go.rehold.io/trade-shib

23 Sept 2024, 14:59 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🥇 With $ETH, $BTC, $PEPE, $XRP, and $FLOKI leading the charge last week, ReHold’s high-yield tools delivered stellar results. 🛠 Optimize your crypto journey with up to 350% APR! 🔗 go.rehold.io/top-5

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rehold_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Sept 2024, 09:06 UTCAnonymous Poll136 voters

👋 Hey, ReHolders? Have you ever participated in a #crypto airdrop? What was your experience like?

  1. 🎁 Successful, got rewards66%
  2. 🍀 Participated, but no luck22%
  3. 💤 Haven’t joined one yet6%
  4. 🐌 What’s a crypto airdrop?6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2024 to 8 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

PAXGold Channel
@PAXGold_Channel · 55,152
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
daGama
@da_ga_ma · 73,302
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
Self Chain
@selfchainxyz · 109,700
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ReHold | Multichain Trading” (@rehold_io), 17,622 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rehold_io.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.