✅ Здесь Рами Зайцман про крипту, реакция на горячие новости мира криптовалют, аналитика и торговля
По рекламе: [email protected] / @shcher7
Ресурс включен в перечень РКН https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6791f406a0ce0051284bf88a
Created
1 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 52 days, net -218. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,412–21,723 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 08:00
21,448
-68
17 Sept 2026, 13:22
21,516
-10
15 Sept 2026, 12:16
21,526
-27
13 Sept 2026, 23:57
21,553
-21
12 Sept 2026, 06:16
21,574
-13
9 Sept 2026, 23:22
21,587
-49
6 Sept 2026, 15:19
21,636
-8
4 Sept 2026, 02:20
21,644
-14
2 Sept 2026, 19:56
21,658
-17
1 Sept 2026, 18:49
21,675
-9
31 Aug 2026, 16:17
21,684
+14
30 Aug 2026, 18:27
21,670
-7
29 Aug 2026, 20:17
21,677
+6
28 Aug 2026, 23:04
21,671
-4
27 Aug 2026, 21:44
21,675
-10
26 Aug 2026, 21:25
21,685
-2
25 Aug 2026, 23:17
21,687
+15
25 Aug 2026, 01:08
21,672
+9
23 Aug 2026, 15:57
21,663
+39
22 Aug 2026, 00:56
21,624
first reading
Engagement
105 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.24%
avg views ÷ 21,448 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,550
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 105 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 34 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
105 (29 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
55,927
Reactions total
683
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 09:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,530
Videos
≈205
Links
≈2,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
12m 35s
Average length
1m 34s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,155 reactions across 100 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
960
30.4%
🔥
610
19.3%
😁
602
19.1%
custom 5391194420550863395
263
8.34%
🤡
250
7.92%
🐳
247
7.83%
🫡
147
4.66%
🗿
39
1.24%
🍌
21
0.666%
👾
9
0.285%
🕊
7
0.222%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,155 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
56
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 103 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptozaycman. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 105 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚠️ BITGET ВЗЛОМАЛИ НА $387,5 МЛН ⚠️
Сразу главное: неделю назад в посте про эйрдропы я упоминал Bitget как площадку, доступную россиянам. И этим утром вкраце упомянул, что в 11 (МСК) биржа начнет компенсации. Но самой темы про взлом не было и я решил её дать:
24 сентября биржу взломали. Сначала ущерб оценивали в $351,6 млн, потом подняли до $387,5 млн: в подсчёт добавили активы в Zcash и Tron. Это крупнейший взлом …
Утренний криптошалом.
Понедельник, 28 сентября
Биток на выходных сходил к $85 100 и не удержал: сейчас $83 400 (−1,1% за сутки), эфир $2 650 (−1,6%). Индекс страха и жадности (настроение толпы от 0 до 100) на 74. Толпа жадничает, график нет.
ЧТО СЛУЧИЛОСЬ ЗА НОЧЬ
Давят ставки. 10-летние облигации США дают 5,16%, максимум с 2007-го. Самый надёжный долг в мире платит пять процентов, за риск в крипте хотят доплату. Ш…
Так зовут тех, кто продаёт на первой просадке, а потом откупает дороже. Решения за такого трейдера принимает страх, а не план.
Пришло из английского paper hands, «бумажные руки». Противоположность - diamond hands, «алмазные руки»: держат позицию несмотря ни на что.
Механика простая. Человек покупает на росте, ловит просадку в 20%, не выдерживает и фиксирует убыток. Через неделю монета возвращается, он заходит снова…
Что ждёт крипту на следующей неделе
Неделя насыщенная, разбираю по дням 📅
ПОНЕДЕЛЬНИК, 28 СЕНТЯБРЯ. Alpenglow у Solana
Стартует активация главного апгрейда сети. Подтверждение транзакции сократится примерно с 12,8 секунды до 150 миллисекунд, то есть станет почти мгновенным.
За апгрейд проголосовали 98% участников, полный запуск ждут в течение октября.
Держим в голове классику: такие события рынок отыгрывает заранее…
Утренний криптошалом. Воскресенье, 27 сентября
Биток $84 526, за сутки +0,6%, за неделю +5%. Эфир $2 707, SOL $121,4. Ночью цена медленно ползла вверх: с $83 780 до $84 625.
ЧТО СЛУЧИЛОСЬ ЗА НОЧЬ
По битку - ничего. Пятый день в коридоре, без новостей и без попыток из него выйти.
Зато снова ожил $ZEC: $1 663, за сутки +8,2%, за неделю +14%. Приватные монеты остаются главной историей года: за двенадцать месяцев секто…
Как слить депозит за одну неделю. Инструкция
Всё проверено на реальных событиях последних семи дней 👇
Шаг 1. Купи то, что уже выросло на 392%. Именно столько за неделю сделал BR. Растёт же, значит, будет расти дальше.
Шаг 2. Возьми плечо х200. На скрине с Bitunix такое плечо принесло +244% при движении цены всего на 1,22%. Правда, полпроцента в обратную сторону обнулили бы позицию, но об этом думать необязательно.
…
Два стопа и +120% за неделю
Обещал показывать все сделки, а не только удачные. Поехали.
❌ ЧТО ЗАБРАЛИ СТОПЫ
Шорт по битку с целью $81 960. Закрыт по стопу 22 сентября: я начал шортить слишком рано, а рынок пошёл к $87 363.
Шорт по POWER. Вход $0,10454, стоп на $0,11014, минус 27% от вложенной маржи. Та же ошибка: зашёл против движения раньше времени.
✅ ЧТО СРАБОТАЛО
Лонг по BTW: +120,19%. Вход $1,0924, выход $1…
⚠️ ВНИМАНИЕ: МОШЕННИКИ КЛОНИРУЮТ МОЙ КАНАЛ ⚠️
Схема работает второй год, и на неё жалуются почти все крупные каналы.
Люди теряют десятки тысяч рублей и потом пишут мне.
КАК ЭТО РАБОТАЕТ
Мошенники делают полную копию моего канала: то же название, та же аватарка, то же описание. Все мои посты они дублируют автоматически, поэтому лента выглядит настоящей. Дальше вас добавляют туда без спроса. Это возможно, потому что …
Закрыл лонг по $BTW: +120%
Вход $1,0924, выход $1,2237. По цене движение всего 12%, но с плечом х10 вышло +120,19% на вложенное.
Вчера монета обновила исторический максимум, сегодня дотянулась до $1,2287. Вышел я почти на самом верху, и тут больше удачи, чем расчёта: цель стояла у сопротивления, туда цена и приехала.
📈 ЧТО ЭТО БЫЛО
Эту монету я раньше шортил и получил свой крупнейший убыток за год. Вывод сделал пр…
Третий разлок подряд, и снова мимо
Сегодня у $XPL разблокировали токены на 65% оборота. Объём огромный: команда и инвесторы получили монеты после годового клиффа.
По учебникам цену должно было придавить. А вышло так: $0,1143, за сутки +30%. Утром монета доходила до $0,125.
📉 И ЭТО НЕ ПЕРВЫЙ РАЗ
BR, 20 сентября. Разлок на 18,7% оборота, я предупреждал о раздаче в ажиотаж. Монета устояла и держится до сих пор.
ZRO, т…
👍6🐳3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @cryptozaycman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ЗЛОЙ ЗАЙЦМАН🤬 @angryzaycman · 36,084 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Привычка Умно💪ЖАТЬ @Habit2Reap · 35,662 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
IF Crypto @if_crypto_ru · 52,701 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
Криптомир с Оксаной Мащенко @cryptooxana · 20,761 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 September 2026
Легалайз @legalayz_live · 20,595 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
Владимир Туров | Бизнес и рост @turov · 48,912 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КриптоЗайцман” (@cryptozaycman), 21,448 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptozaycman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.