Channel
@jianpuzhaiu
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
101,298subscribers
-60,639 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002102196916 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jianpuzhaiu |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jianpuzhaiu |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 11:45 | 101,298 | -1,447 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:40 | 102,745 | -623 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:17 | 103,368 | -1,242 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:00 | 104,610 | -763 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:28 | 105,373 | -490 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:16 | 105,863 | -99 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:26 | 105,962 | -838 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:08 | 106,800 | -857 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:40 | 107,657 | -915 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:39 | 108,572 | -1,831 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:39 | 110,403 | -1,635 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:27 | 112,038 | -804 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 112,842 | -963 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:57 | 113,805 | -1,369 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:47 | 115,174 | -1,230 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 116,404 | -1,327 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:06 | 117,731 | -1,609 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:44 | 119,340 | -1,480 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:05 | 120,820 | -448 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 121,268 | first reading |
2,253 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 179 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 770 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,253 (6 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 6,772 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 08:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 332 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 September 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 770 posts held from the last 30 days (0.13%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🦉🐶🐭🐭🐹🐰🐰🦊🐽🐸🙈🦆🦉 🥰😎😎😎😎🛍😎😎😎🥰可查验 🥰NO钱包担保3000万U🥰可查验 🥰大事件担保300万U🥰可查验 😀😀😀😀 【神秘大哥绝地翻盘】 曾经狂输300万U，本以为彻底凉凉，没想到短短几天竟连续爆奖、疯狂连红！ 从深渊一路杀回巅峰，账户数字一路狂飙，最终成功提款335万U 不仅全部回血，还直接反超盈利，强势逆转局势，庄家都看傻了！ “原本只是想回一点，结果越打越顺，根本停不下来！”这一波操作，直接封神！完成惊人回血 😘 别人怕你赢，我们怕你不敢赢！亿级储备金硬核坐镇，稳定出款就是最大底气。今天赢多少，今天就安全带走多少！ 🐊官方飞投 : @XG0888bot 😀😀😀😀: @XG3000 😀😀😀😀: @XGKF600 😀😀😀😀: @XGzhaoshang 😀😀😀😀: xg866.cc 😀😀柬埔寨部分用户访问不了主域名，请访问xigang0.vip/xigang1.vip/xigang2.vi
柬埔寨向46名外交代表通报反诈进展：园区被查，诈骗团伙换地方？ 11月8日，柬埔寨高级部长兼打击网络诈骗委员会秘书处负责人蔡西那烈在金边向46名外交官及国际组织代表通报柬埔寨打击网络诈骗行动的最新进展，并介绍下一阶段工作方向。 柬埔寨政府表示，将继续通过加强执法、司法追责和国际合作，严厉打击网络诈骗团伙及其背后的犯罪网络，防止诈骗活动死灰复燃。 据官方数据，2025年7月至2026年8月底，柬埔寨执法部门已检查832处涉嫌网络诈骗地点，对其中663处采取打击行动，并控制86处大型诈骗园区。 不过，反诈行动也面临新挑战。蔡西那烈此前透露，随着大型诈骗园区受到打击，部分诈骗活动开始转向出租屋、公寓和私人住宅，变得更加分散和隐蔽。 简单来说，大园区被查，小场所又成了新目标。诈骗团伙也在不断换地方、换方式，执法部门自然不能松懈。 柬埔寨政府强调，打击跨国网络诈骗不能只靠一国单打独斗，还需要各国加强情报共享、跨境调查和执法合作…
#网友投稿：西港太子寰宇准备有宪兵去检查了，目前只知道的有A3-29楼要被检查，其它楼层不清楚，附近的注意了！！！ 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄老牌品质之选 信誉至上 煮酒论英雄 广告论实力 😀😀😀😝😒😤😣🧐 U盘别看其它野鸡台子了 要玩就得选王者平台 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
拜林省“狠角色”落网！ 柬埔寨拜林省萨拉雷尔区警方近日逮捕一名中国籍男子，涉嫌非法持有武器及贩运毒品。 看来如今在柬埔寨混，也得有点“实力”，没两把刷子还真混不下去啊 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 8⃣🔤🔤🔤亿级域名 上押担保300万美金 实力派 数字够短 品牌够大 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄 🥰NO钱包担保3000万U🥰可查验😘 🥰新全迅网担保500万U🥰可查验😘 🥰东南亚大事件担保300万U🥰可查验😘 😄☹️😞😔😜😛😜🤪🤨😒🤓 😄首存送 复存送 充值笔笔加赠3️⃣🔤 😄每日以小博大 PG爆奖加赠送彩金 😄奖金池 2️⃣ 亿 USDT 大奖整装待爆 😄电子百家乐0审核 0风控 包出款 😄全新代理合作模式5️⃣5️⃣%永久留存 😄全网第一⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️根本领不完 😄盈亏大赠送 雪中送炭不如锦上添花 😄公信力保障 公正透明 全网上押担保 😄全网U投综合盘N0.1 资金储备3亿U ❤️ 柬埔寨盘总PA真人百家乐当日盈利200万U，1400W人民币，大额无忧，查看战绩 ❤️ 泰国大佬PG电子麻将胡了爆奖160万U，1100W人民币，大额无忧，查看战绩 😄PG娱乐城实力毋庸置疑！盘总大哥们随便来操，只要你敢赢，我们就敢给你下！ ❤️官方飞投： @PG28FTBOT 😄官方招商: …
#木牌快讯：柴桢省（Svay Rieng）当局在巴域市（Bavet City）查获并突袭了一处窝点；该窝点内部设有精密且隐蔽的设施，被用于实施网络诈骗。现场还发现了一条隐藏在衣柜后的地下通道。 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄老牌品质之选 信誉至上 煮酒论英雄 广告论实力 😀😀😀😝😒😤😣🧐 U盘别看其它野鸡台子了 要玩就得选王者平台 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
#泰国资讯：春武里府开展执法行动，多名非法务工人员被捕 11月8日上午，据当地消息，泰国有关部门在春武里府展开执法检查行动，现场有多名涉嫌非法务工的人员被执法人员带走调查。 目前，具体抓捕人数、涉案人员国籍及后续处理情况尚未公布。 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 8⃣🔤🔤🔤亿级域名 上押担保300万美金 实力派 数字够短 品牌够大 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
老挝金三角经济特区持续打击电诈及非法网络赌博，大批酒店和商业建筑沦为空楼 据泰国媒体 MGR Online 11月8日报道，老挝金三角经济特区过去一年持续开展针对电信诈骗、网络诈骗及非法网络赌博团伙的清理整治行动。随着当地执法力度不断加强，部分此前被诈骗及网络赌博团伙租用的酒店、商业建筑和办公场所已经停止运营，目前处于废弃状态。 报道指出，老挝当地执法部门持续与中国有关方面开展合作，对涉及电信诈骗、非法网络赌博等跨国犯罪活动进行打击，并依法处理及遣返涉案的不同国籍人员。 随着整治行动持续推进，金三角经济特区内部分曾被犯罪团伙使用的场所已经失去原有用途。特区方面表示，后续将继续加强监管，防止相关犯罪团伙重新利用当地商业设施开展非法活动。 与此同时，当地也在推动基础设施及旅游项目建设，希望逐步改善特区形象，推动经济和旅游业恢复发展。 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄老牌品质之选 信誉至…
#菲律宾资讯：查获价值 500 万比索涉嫌走私的摩托车零件；一名中国籍男子被捕 在菲律宾国家警察（PNP）总长何塞·梅伦西奥·纳塔泰斯二世（Jose Melencio C. Nartatez Jr.）警将的领导下，警方持续加大对非法商业活动的打击力度。 在一项针对非法商品交易的执法行动中，警方于瓦伦瑞拉市（Valenzuela City）逮捕了一名中国籍男子，并查扣了价值超过 500 万比索涉嫌走私的摩托车零件。 刑事调查与侦查组（CIDG）东区外勤队的侦查人员在与相关企业代表协调后，前往瓦伦瑞拉市马林塔社区（Barangay Malinta）马科斯街 1174 号展开联合行动，成功逮捕了该名中国籍嫌疑人。 行动中查扣了各种摩托车配件及零件，包括刹车泵线、避震器、气缸、软管和把手套等，估计市场总价值为 5,020,500.00 比索。用于诱捕行动的资金也已被收回。 目前，被捕人员及查扣的非毒品类证物已被移交至 CIDG…
🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🙂🙂🙂🙂 🍱金贝娱乐 大品牌老牌子 全网广告费每月投入高达500万美金，送“野鸡黑台”一句话，勿伤玩家利益，勿毁博彩信誉。 🍦全球布局 娱乐造富 无惧爆庄 千万任提。 🍦东南亚国家地区不限ip 盘总娱乐首选。 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 🙂首存送 复存送 充值笔笔加赠3% 🙂每日以小博大 PG爆奖加赠送彩金 🙂电子百家乐0审核 0风控 包出款 🙂全新代理合作模式55%永久留存 🙂公信力保障、即时开奖、公正透明 🙂储备金以亿为单位 大额秒出无上限 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 🥠当无数野鸡网在生灭中挣扎时，金贝始终屹立不倒。这就是我们送给全行业最响亮的耳光！ 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 😀😀😀😀😀 @JB03BOT 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 @jinbei07 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 @jinbeidaili 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 @JBzhaoshang 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 jb166.vip
金边今天早上又发现一具浮尸，目前身份信息尚未确认，还没有相关执法人员前来将其尸体捞起 背影看起来就很像中国人，有看背影能认出来的朋友吗？ 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄老牌品质之选 信誉至上 煮酒论英雄 广告论实力 😀😀😀😝😒😤😣🧐 U盘别看其它野鸡台子了 要玩就得选王者平台 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
#菲律宾资讯：警方捣毁跨国地下网络斗鸡赌博窝点，19人被捕 菲律宾布拉干省警方于11月5日晚展开突击执法行动，捣毁一处涉嫌经营地下网络斗鸡赌博业务的窝点，当场逮捕19名涉案人员，另有两名场所负责人被列为追诉对象。 据当地媒体11月7日报道，行动于11月5日晚上约6时30分展开，地点位于菲律宾布拉干省（Bulacan）潘迪镇（Pandi）Barangay Poblacion。警方接获相关线索后，对涉案场所实施突击检查。 初步调查显示，该场所涉嫌通过专业直播设备及计算机系统，将斗鸡比赛进行现场直播，并向境外用户提供在线下注服务。警方怀疑，其业务网络涉及柬埔寨、越南及墨西哥等国家。 执法人员突袭现场时，发现两个独立的直播工作室，并查获多台电脑、显示器、专业摄像机、摄像机控制器、音频混音器、麦克风、手机及其他电子设备，另有4只活斗鸡。 此次行动共逮捕19人。警方同时将两名未在现场出现的场所负责人列为追诉对象，涉及人员共21人。…
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,253 posts we hold for @jianpuzhaiu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大事件 柬埔寨大事件 巴基斯坦新闻” (@jianpuzhaiu), 101,298 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jianpuzhaiu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.