Channel
@dibaif
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,660subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002111667832 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dibaif |
| Description | #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #迪拜 #泰国 东南亚狗推（头条新闻）频道专注于东南亚华人最新动态资讯，生活故事分享，海外华人求助，让你看尽海外华人大小事。 欢迎互助投稿爆料: @Bnnc888 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dibaif |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 9 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @miandianQ/580226 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC | @dibaif/72047 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC | 1.00 | 24 hours |
| @miandianQ/580236 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC | @dibaif/72048 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC | 1.00 | 24 hours |
| @miandianQ/580256 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC | @dibaif/72060 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC | 1.00 | 24 hours |
| @miandianQ/581767 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC | @dibaif/72049 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @miandianQ/581827 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC | @dibaif/72055 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @miandianQ/581857 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC | @dibaif/72058 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @miandianQ | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 72 seconds | @miandianQ (11–0) |
| @yuenanU | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @yuenanU (10–0) |
| @baoliaoc | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @baoliaoc (8–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 29 of the 29 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 23 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 9, the earliest publisher we hold is @miandianQ. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 8 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 13,660 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 13,668 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 13,671 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:10 | 13,674 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:41 | 13,676 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 13,676 | first reading |
141 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 140 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 141 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 934 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 54 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 141 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#柬埔寨资讯：警方突查涉嫌未成年人性剥削场所 34人被控制包括5名未成年人 近日，柬埔寨国家警察总署反人口贩卖和保护未成年人局联合地方执法部门，在干丹省昂斯努县姆卡克乡特拉平克朗村开展专项行动，对一家名为“金占比”的店铺进行突击检查。 据警方通报，该场所涉嫌存在隐藏性未成年人性剥削活动（儿童卖淫）的违法行为。执法人员在行动中对现场人员进行控制，并展开身份核查及调查取证工作。此次行动共控制34人，其中女性31人，包括5名未成年人。目前，相关人员已被带往柬埔寨国家警察总署接受进一步调查。 警方表示，涉案未成年人将按照法律程序，在完成询问和身份确认后，移交金边市社会事务、退伍军人和青年改造部门进行安置保护，并提供必要的法律援助和社会支持。对于涉嫌违法犯罪的人员，警方将继续依法调查，并在证据充分后移送法院处理。 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清…
🇮🇩 印尼暂停向约150万涉网赌家庭发放社保救助金 印尼社会事务部8月5日对外宣布，因经与金融交易报告和分析中心（PPATK）数据比对发现，约150万个受资助家庭的账户涉嫌参与网络赌博交易，当局已暂停向其发放基础食品计划等社会救助金。 社会事务部长赛福拉表示，受影响家庭包括近80万个极贫困家庭，目前资金已被冻结并接受调查。这一数字较2025年的60万户大幅增加。政府正核实资金滥用情况，并将以此更新国家社会经济数据库（DTSEN），同时联合多部门加大清查及宣传力度，防止极贫群体陷入网赌泥潭。 越穷越赌，越赌越穷？ 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888
🇺🇸美国FBI局长披露“黑夜行动”成果 在特朗普总统的领导下，联邦调查局正在主动出击，直捣窃取美国人毕生积蓄的全球诈骗网络。代号为“黑夜行动”（Operation Blackout）的行动取得了以下历史性成果： → 查扣了价值152亿美元的非法资产 → 捣毁了数十个诈骗中心 → 逮捕了数百名犯罪分子 → 解救了数千名人口贩运受害者 → 关闭了7500多个互联网终端 → 向近9000名潜在受害者发出了预警 → 避免了约5.62亿美元的潜在损失 这些诈骗中心并非简单的呼叫中心，而是跨国犯罪企业，从事人口贩运，洗钱数十亿美元，并且从海外针对美国人实施犯罪活动。 ——联邦调查局局长卡什· 帕特尔 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888
#菲律宾新闻 防洪预算降至1074亿比索，菲政府这次要严查！ 菲律宾公共工程与公路部（DPWH）8月12日表示，将加强对2027年1074亿比索防洪预算的监督，确保每一笔钱都用在真正需要的项目上。 公共工程部长文斯·迪松表示，未来纳入预算的防洪工程必须提前做好规划，并与地方政府协调，避免项目“有钱就建”，却无法真正解决洪灾问题。 值得注意的是，1074亿比索的预算明显低于过去，菲律宾防洪预算最高时曾接近3000亿比索。 政府还计划通过“透明门户网站”公开相关项目，让民众查询工程进度和资金使用情况，接受社会监督。 迪松表示，除了清理排水系统、疏浚河道外，政府也在研究水坝、山区蓄水设施等长期项目，并重新评估连接拉古纳湖与马尼拉湾的大型排洪工程。 他强调，防洪资金有限，政府必须确保每一项工程真正发挥作用，避免公共资金被浪费。 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zha…
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 👍👍👍👍👍 😘 【贵宾会】 强势启航，集团背书，信誉担保，全网首发，引爆彩票娱乐新纪元！六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 全民代理全民收单 助您白手起家 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 官网 750.cc ⚡️⚡️⚡️👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 👍扎根东南亚，面向全世界，打造东南亚华人的专属银行，携 Solaire 千亿实体资本入场，菲律宾索莱尔 · 官方直营，欢迎盘总挑战狗庄。 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️👍👍👍👍👍 😘PG娱乐城大客户再创新高： 👍天之骄子：日本神秘大佬PG电子麻将胡了爆大奖出款176万U👈点击 👍重磅来袭：新加坡盘口老板百家乐1条天路喜提320万U👈点击 👍空前绝后：缅甸某园区股东9天赢走192万U 单笔提款百万u财务秒出款👈点击 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 ⚡️⚡️PG集团耗资百亿打造全网最顶级线上娱乐城，业界龙头行业第一，PG直营仅此一站! 😀😀😀😀😀 @PGyx8_co…
#国内资讯：广东梅州公安侦破特大虚假助贷诈骗案，抓获106人，涉案金额380余万元！ 广东省公安厅8月4日通报：近期，梅州市公安机关深入研判、波次收网，成功打掉一个传统诈骗与电信网络诈骗相结合，利用“线上+线下”模式，在全国实施虚假助贷的新型诈骗犯罪团伙，彻底捣毁“信息端—引流端—线下端—话务端”完整犯罪链条，抓获犯罪嫌疑人106人，涉案金额达380余万元。 经查，涉案团伙假借银行名义，向全国不特定群众群发虚假贷款诱导信息，完成前端引流，同时安排专人对受害人尤其是重疾人员、老年人、失业人员等易受骗群体进行话术引导，随后推送至本地线下“助贷公司”。线下助贷公司利用合法注册公司、正规写字楼办公的方式包装经营资质，伪装合法正规经营身份对接上门客户，通过虚构贷款实力、谎称拥有内部审批渠道、专属放款额度、低利率贷款资质等名义，对不懂网络贷款的群众虚构“风险管理金”骗取网贷金额25%的费用，实则仅代办群众可自主申请办理的普通信贷业务。 …
朱镕基同志逝世 中国共产党中央委员会、中华人民共和国全国人民代表大会常务委员会、中华人民共和国国务院、中国人民政治协商会议全国委员会沉痛宣告：中国共产党的优秀党员，久经考验的忠诚的共产主义战士，杰出的无产阶级革命家、政治家，党和国家的卓越领导人，中国共产党第十四届、十五届中央政治局常委，国务院原总理朱镕基同志，因病医治无效，于2026年8月12日11时06分在北京逝世，享年98岁。 朱镕基同志，1928年10月生，湖南长沙人。 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀【贵宾会】 强势启航，集团背书，信誉担保，全网首发，引爆彩票娱乐新纪元！六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 全民代理全民收单 助您白手起家 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 官网 750.cc 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀【辉煌】业界最高返水 1.6%无上限 😀【辉煌】免实名不限地区 日提千万U 😀【辉煌】网投第一品牌 公正公平无私彩 😀【辉煌】10亿😂奖池 大奖根本爆不停 😀【辉煌】福利天花板 入款笔笔赠送3% 😀【辉煌】盘总首选娱乐城 创造新辉煌 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😕助您辉煌人生，雪中送炭不如锦上添花： 😀单笔出款😀😀😀万 额外奖励18888 😀单笔出款😀😀😀万 额外奖励58888 😘狗庄落泪：昨日幸运玩家仅用800u返水爆庄193万u，0审核0卡款 财务秒出 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😘官方招商: @HHDL8888 😘官方飞投: @HH0933bot
💎彩票168统一开奖，公平公开公正【计划群】 无视任何彩种 专业带赢 💎翻身致富: @SGcaipiao168 ✅幸运飞艇，北京赛车，澳洲幸运10，大发快三，幸运时时彩，香港/澳门六合彩等精准包赢计划 ✅合理规划本金，理性下注，日进斗金，双赢旗航 168官方开奖 全网中奖率最高 专业团队研究计划走势! ✅支持 usdt 汇旺 存取款 大额无忧 ✅群计划24小时火热进行，实现财富实时增长，万人交流，福利不停 🔥万人交流: @SGcaipiao168 🏆包赢计划 日赚20万 全网唯一官彩168双赢台子 加入我们 干倒狗庄 🏆打工翻不了身 横财才能暴富 🏆首存赠送100%，福利天花板 💎彩金专员: @xd650cc 💎包赢计划: @SGcaipiao168 💎官方网址： 751477.com ✅全网独家官方彩票万人交流大群
#小姐姐爆料：刘豪杰（凯文），四川成都人。之前在西港黄乐园区，公司名叫创亿集团，他担任总监一职，在国内通缉网上早已榜上有名。 抱歉，占用大家时间及公共资源。本来不想曝光的，但是我给的时间已经够多了，我的耐心早已经没了。此人以感情的名义跟我在一起，从23年9月份开始，我累计转账借给他人民币近100万。到后面我才知道，他有老婆小孩。截至今年为止，他还我的人民币不到10000块。这些钱都是我辛辛苦苦上班赚来的钱。我承认自己恋爱脑，我傻，我蠢。 今天曝光你，我知道你能看到。我给你3天时间，3天时间内如果没有联系我，我会在国内立案。所有转账记录以及聊天记录，我都有。另外，不管你在东南亚任何地方，我都会动用我所有的资源及人脉找到你。我这边一旦立案，你相信我，我会给你办成专案，够你喝一壶的了。 你就算在天涯海角，我也要倾家荡产让人把你抓回来。不为别的，我不想你继续去祸害别人。另外，立案过后，我会每天开直播，直到东南亚所有人都知道你的为人…
🇻🇳 越南丰科坊深夜突击检查，多名人员被带走调查 2026年8月12日 越南丰科坊（Phong Cốc）警方开展夜间突击检查行动，对当地部分人员及场所进行检查。 据现场消息称，行动期间有多人被警方带走接受调查，其中包括外籍人员。目前尚不清楚被带走人员是否涉及吸毒或其他违法行为。 近期越南部分地区持续加强治安检查，重点关注网络诈骗、涉du活动以及外籍人员身份和合法证件等情况。 此次行动的具体原因、被带走人数及后续处理结果，目前仍有待当地警方或有关部门进一步公布。 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888
柴桢省巴域市突袭9处可疑窝点 查获6名涉案人员 昨天，柴桢省统一指挥部在巴域市展开大规模联合行政检查，突击搜查了9处涉嫌非法居留及网赌电诈的可疑窝点（8处位于CK园区，1处位于2号夜市区）。 检查发现，其中7处共有13名中越籍人员居住，暂未发现电诈证据；另2处涉嫌电诈，查获6名涉案人员、6本护照、4台笔记本电脑及33部手机等作案工具。 目前涉案场所已被临时封锁，人员及物品已移交科技犯罪打击局依法处理。 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888
Showing the 12 most recent of 141 posts we hold for @dibaif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,112,578 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“迪拜新闻|迪拜大事件|东南亚大事件” (@dibaif), 13,660 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dibaif.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.