Channel
@chigua186
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,822subscribers
-43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001956565895 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chigua186 |
| Description | 不明所以的吃瓜群众。发布内容不做权威考究，娱乐为主。 【福利精品】 @BY1998 【资源导航】 @DH136 【东南亚新闻 】 @cn789 【商务合作 】 @shuaibi |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chigua186 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 19,822 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 19,831 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 19,840 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 19,846 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 19,850 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 19,860 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 19,867 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 19,865 | first reading |
129 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 129 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 129 (7 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,745 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 87 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
35 reactions across 34 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 32 | 91.4% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 8.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 129 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
TG代理 飞机高速代理： 🧩澳门1：https://t.me/proxy?server=45.207.35.76&port=5557&secret=eee3a514bfd7d96f38eed4bf1951a8ffa7617a7572652e6d6963726f736f66742e636f6d 🧩香港5：tg://proxy?server=45.192.192.130&port=44781&secret=eeaae504b0a6a52cfb8a1d66bc5f85ece9617a7572652e6d6963726f736f66742e636f6d 🧩香港6：tg://proxy?server=45.192.193.147&port=5559&secret=eeaf45eec4f55f0cf1d510ae0a781d7669617a7572652e6d6963726f736f66742e636f6d 🧩香港7：tg://pr…
❤1
☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ 🌟 官方网址： 6G.com 😀 6G 全球娱乐｜资金安全 🈴 百亿护航 · 全球公认最稳 👩❤️👨👩❤️👩💑👨❤️👨👩❤️💋👨🪢🧶🧵🪡🧥 🔥 上押1000万U + 💵亿万储备金 🌊 大额秒提，放心赢 🔎点击查验 👍 电子每日狂送16% 加赠福利 😀 官网数据同步 · 公平 · 公正 · 公开 · 无私彩 🔤 新人 · 首存豪礼返利 · 每月逢 6 现金大反馈 😃 爆庄实录｜3天狂揽1086万U 😃 新客首存6万U，豪提209万U 😃 500一拉，PG实力兑现133万U 🇭🇰 彩票入口： 6G123.com 😀 加拿大 · PC28 · 超高赔率 📌柬埔寨地区请访问专用域名 6G.VIP 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 6G.com 😕1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ @AA6G 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ @KF6G 🔓 真正的实力，不需要解释，稳定出款，就是最好的名片。
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🤑 铂莱娱乐 8年老品牌 广告费每月投入高达500万U，全网担保上押1300万U，送“野鸡黑台”一句话，勿伤玩家利益，勿毁博彩信誉。 🫢 【贵宾会 750.cc 】 强势启航 集团背书 信誉担保 全网首发，引爆彩票娱乐新纪元！六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 合营代理 独立后台 佣金周结 自主赚赔 层级保护，官方零接触用户 🏃♀️ 很多平台热衷于宣传玩家中奖，却对中奖后的“漫长审核”“异常冻结”闭口不谈。 😀 就在本月，PG电子爆出200万u巨奖。本金仅为5000u…… 😎 截至目前：200万U 已极速下发，单笔提款百万u秒出，亿级储备金硬核坐镇，不要去考验小盘的良心，要选就选大盘的实力。 🌟 当无数野鸡网在生灭中挣扎时，铂莱始终屹立不倒。这就是我们送给全行业最响亮的耳光！ 😀😀😀😀: @BLKF0 😀😀😀😀: @bolaidaili 🟢🟢😀😄:…
8月13日，广东佛山超盈实验中学，现场有大量群众聚集，警车及特警车辆到场，现场有执法人员维持秩序，附近道路已经实施了封控隔离。
8月12日晚间，大量贵州网友拉横幅聚集在广东佛山超盈实验中学门口抗议。 近期，佛山超盈实验中学足球队在贵州榕江县举办的“班超杯”青少年足球赛中夺冠。该校一名叫张旭的17岁球员，在网上发表地域歧视言论，挑衅、辱骂贵州和贵州人，事件迅速在网上发酵。很快有在粤贵州人聚集在该校门口抗议。
受害者手指神经断了。 加害者是跨性别OD地雷，也有在卖药，出门前才OD。 最后一张就是加害者的帐号。
扬州万达扫黄打黑行动开始了哈，各位喜欢大保健的朋友注意了
接上条 听录音好绝望
又一个被骗到缅甸的小女孩
你现在说 你爱我 我们还没离婚呢，抓小三
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @chigua186. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 707,944 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吃瓜群众/内涵段子/搞笑视频” (@chigua186), 19,822 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chigua186.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.