Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 吃瓜群众/内涵段子/搞笑视频

Channel

吃瓜群众/内涵段子/搞笑视频

@chigua186

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,271subscribers

-594 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001956565895
TypeChannel
Username@chigua186
Description不明所以的吃瓜群众。发布内容不做权威考究,娱乐为主。 【福利精品】 @BY1998 【资源导航】 @DH136 【东南亚新闻 】 @cn789 【商务合作 】 @shuaibi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/chigua186

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@chigua186/127207 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC@gaoxiaochigua8/3153921 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC1.0029 hours
@chigua186/127481 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC@gaoxiaochigua8/3166922 Aug 2026, 23:28 UTC1.0013 hours
@chigua186/127490 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC@gaoxiaochigua8/3167522 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC1.001.8 hours
@gaoxiaochigua8/3172623 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC@chigua186/127676 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC1.003.8 hours
@gaoxiaochigua8/3220630 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC@chigua186/128482 · this entry30 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC1.004.6 hours
@baguabox/5536612 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTC@chigua186/126186 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC1.005.8 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@gaoxiaochigua87 (5/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004.2 hoursthis entry (4–3)
@baguabox5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.5 hours@baguabox (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 198 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

19,27119,86719,5697 August 202611 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net -594. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,182–19,956 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 21:3919,271-14
10 Nov 2026, 00:4619,285-9
8 Nov 2026, 14:0019,294-16
7 Nov 2026, 08:2519,310-3
6 Nov 2026, 09:2019,313-15
5 Nov 2026, 10:3019,328+1
4 Nov 2026, 08:2119,327-4
3 Nov 2026, 09:3619,331-14
2 Nov 2026, 11:5719,345+12
1 Nov 2026, 12:1719,333-6
31 Oct 2026, 15:4019,339-11
30 Oct 2026, 17:2019,350-8
29 Oct 2026, 15:0719,358-2
28 Oct 2026, 16:1719,360-9
27 Oct 2026, 16:4619,369+1
26 Oct 2026, 15:3619,368-4
25 Oct 2026, 16:1719,372+11
24 Oct 2026, 15:5619,361-1
23 Oct 2026, 16:2819,362-5
22 Oct 2026, 14:5819,367first reading

Engagement

625 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.20%
avg views ÷ 19,271 subscribers
Avg views / post
231
123 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
123
of 625 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 123 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held625 (7 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total28,388
Reactions total29
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 16:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈53,700
Videos
≈79,500
Links
≈18,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5h 36m
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 405 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

176 reactions across 140 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9956.3%
❤3017.0%
💯126.82%
🔥116.25%
🎉84.55%
👀84.55%
👏63.41%
💩10.568%
🤣10.568%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 156 of the 625 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 625 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 123 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 11:52 UTC208 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Telegram搜索百度王 TG资源搜索 👉 @baiduwan 👉 @baiduwan 👉 @baiduwan

13 Nov 2026, 11:51 UTC61 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ 😘😘😘😘😪😮‍💨😵 🌟 品牌运营 · 公平透明 🈴 上亿储备 · 实力品牌 · 放心娱乐 😀官方网址: 6G.com 📌柬埔寨专用域名: 6G.VIP 🦧🦣🐘🦛🦏🐪🐫🦒🦘 😔 持续积累口碑,平台实力看得见 ➡️ 新人注册即送🔡 36U体验金 💎 原平台VIP等级 · 无条件转移 💎 返水😀.😀😀起·无需打码 💎 代理全线抽水+负盈返佣高达50% 💎 邀请好友奖励🍌🍌🍌U 🦬🐃🐂🐄🫏🐎🐖🐏🐑 😔 大额处理更迅速,服务体验更稳定 😃 爆庄实录|3天狂揽1086万U 😃 新客首存6万U,豪提209万U 😃 500一拉,PG实力兑现133万U 😀 官网: 6G.COM 😀 彩票: 6G567.COM 😕飞投 @AA6G 💻客服 @KF6G 1️⃣代理 @daili6g 🤑 爆奖 @ceo6g 🔓 实力无需解释 · 出款快就是证明!

13 Nov 2026, 11:51 UTC59 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 😍 新人注册就送28U 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 😍 USDT-ETH-ABA-OKpay 🎉 反水:实时反水1.3%起 🩷❤️🧡💛💚🩵💙💜🖤🩶 🌶 实力保障: 链上储备公开可查 🌶代理55%返佣!无套路秒结算 👂麻将1 麻将2 赏金大对决 👠2026首创:PA真人秒提112万U,秒到账 👠秀翻全场: BBIN赌神附体单笔提款125万U 👠运气爆棚:木牌大佬PP电子爆奖90万U 👠拍案叫绝:西港某主管BBIN狂揽115万U 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 🎌 官网: KX.TOP 🎌 客服:@KXOK8 🎌 招商:@KX999

13 Nov 2026, 11:47 UTC159 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

女朋友出轨,男友选择原谅,结果间隔不到8天又谈了个摩友

13 Nov 2026, 11:46 UTC144 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

刘恺威和新女友 在深圳万象城吃饭 被偶遇 刘恺威已经52岁了,看起来依旧年轻啊,没有老人味 感觉她的新女友没有大幂幂好看

13 Nov 2026, 11:45 UTC141 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

数百名英伟达员工签署了一封内部信函,要求恢复黄仁勋担任首席执行官,并要求董事会辞职!!

13 Nov 2026, 11:45 UTC137 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

小仙女地铁站吵架 拼演技!白色衣服演技更胜一筹。

Showing the 12 most recent of 625 posts we hold for @chigua186. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

内涵段子🔥搞笑视频
@nh888 · 155,613
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 12 August 2026
内涵段子 🔥搞笑视频 天🌐下
@neihanduanzi1 · 208,697
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 11 August 2026
吃瓜群众🍉
@chigua_e · 215,424
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 11 August 2026
新闻频道 @cctv5
@cctv5 · 103,255
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 12 August 2026
吃瓜群众🍉
@chigua2022 · 193,681
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 11 August 2026
西港大事件(曝光)
@xigang9918 · 75,379
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 24 August 2026
生活素材包装【阿Q资讯】
@AQzx_7 · 67,381
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 23 August 2026
搞笑段子《问题不大》😹
@GXduanzi1 · 53,028
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 13 August 2026
全网吃瓜🍉
@aichiguaba · 246,184
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚大事件 吃瓜新闻 马来西亚
@chiguak · 107,696
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 23 August 2026
东南亚大事件|海外事件|吃瓜曝光|今日头条
@miandianDS · 41,502
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 27 August 2026
头条新闻💥搞笑视频
@z055q · 24,230
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 19 August 2026
【吃瓜🍉&搞笑】
@GQSP9 · 56,615
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 14 August 2026
中文吃瓜中心沙雕日常 🍉
@chigua_a · 214,479
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 12 August 2026
吃瓜群众【 猎奇】
@chiguadog · 155,848
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 12 August 2026
东南亚挨打日记
@pyzcn · 220,965
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“吃瓜群众/内涵段子/搞笑视频” (@chigua186), 19,271 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chigua186.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.