Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Чартомойка

@chartomojka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,888subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001109735806
TypeChannel
Username@chartomojka
DescriptionО графиках: плохих, хороших и других. От восхищения до ненависти — один chart. Заметили подозрительный график, присылайте — @bogachev11
Created9 February 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chartomojka

Growth

14,88614,88914,887.56 August 2026 — 14,889 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,889 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,886 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,888 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,887 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,889 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,888 subscribers14,8886 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,886–14,889 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:0614,888-1
11 Aug 2026, 17:3114,889+2
9 Aug 2026, 17:4214,887-1
8 Aug 2026, 18:0414,888+2
7 Aug 2026, 19:2814,886-3
6 Aug 2026, 02:2114,889no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:0314,889first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 20 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.4%
avg views ÷ 14,888 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,480
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held15 (20 February 202612 August 2026)
Views total17,390
Reactions total217
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
753
Videos
29
Links
628

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,508 reactions across 15 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁65443.4%
19212.7%
🤣1509.95%
🤯986.50%
🔥855.64%
😱684.51%
👍533.51%
🏆523.45%
👏452.98%
🤔201.33%
🤡140.928%
👎110.729%
💯110.729%
🥰100.663%
😍80.531%
🍌70.464%
🤩60.398%
💩50.332%
😢50.332%
🥴40.265%
5 further kinds100.663%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,508reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC≈1,310 views65 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @interactivenewsVideo

Сегодня вечером в Европе будет полное солнечное затмение. И я очень рад, что мой проект про затмения попал в подборку Datawrapper рядом с отличными проектами Reuters и The New York Times — командами, чью работу я бесконечно уважаю. Для меня это большая честь. Вообще, мне кажется, такой формат все еще вполне способен привлекать читателей: не обязательно эксплейнер со скроллителлингом, а скорее большой интерактивный

37👍12👏8🔥8

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

29 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC≈3,190 views65 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

В бургере есть булочка? Кетчуп? Майонез? Лук? Быть не может, никогда бы не подумал. ИИ-иллюстрация занимает пол-экрана. Справа два числа. В заге — риторический вопрос. В источниках расчеты на основе Росстата. Может быть вместо взрыв схемы бургера показать график роста и сравнить с инфляцией? Можно будет например увидеть динамику изменений, в какие моменты рост становился быстрее и отрывался от инфляции. Нет, лучш

😁42🤣17💯2🔥2😢2

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

27 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC≈3,360 views28 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Полностью согласен с Лёшей, ИИ меняет подход к визуализации. И это прекрасно. Но накладывает больше ответственности в части "знать, что делаешь". Кстати, по-дружески очень советую курс Лёши. Если бы я сейчас только начинал эта заниматься, обязательно записался бы. https://t.me/perfectgraphs/381

9👍8🥰7😁2👏1🔥1

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

24 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC≈4,760 views29 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Датавраппер наносит ответный удар. Они добавили возможность делать каскадную диаграмму (waterfall) и.. двойные оси! С которыми Лиза Шарлотта Мут (тогда ещё Рост) ранее активно боролась. Впрочем, теперь она говорит, что изменила свое мнение и даже написала статью когда и как правильно их использовать. Читаем: https://www.datawrapper.de/blog/dual-axis-charts-guide

😁17🤯92🔥1

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

18 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC≈4,770 views30 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Просто симпатичная подборка иконических датавиз-проектов от Яна Хольтца. В закладки для вдохновения https://www.dataviz-inspiration.com/

17👍7🔥6

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

19 Jun 2026, 18:13 UTC≈6,660 views110 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁81🤣17🔥102

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

11 Jun 2026, 12:29 UTC≈8,410 views61 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

В честь начинающегося ЧМ по футболу запилил небольшой интерактивчик про перелеты команд и углеродный след от них. Ссылка: worldcup.bogachev.fr Там цифры не очень большие, а вот если брать с болельщиками, которые летают с матча на матч - в 500-1500 раз больше. По разным оценкам на ближайшем чемпионате углеродный удар составит 8-9 млн тонн CO2. Это больше чем годовые выбросы небольшой страны типа Кипра 🤷🏻 Но всё

26🔥14👎10❤‍🔥3💩2🤡2😁2💔1

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

14 May 2026, 09:53 UTC≈6,830 views134 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Свежий график Коммерсанта, и то, как его видят читатели.

😁88👏19🤯16💯91👎1

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

1 Apr 2026, 18:21 UTC≈8,120 views148 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

И ещё один шедевр Via Отвратительные графики

🤣87🤯379🔥4🐳3👍3😢3😁2

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

23 Mar 2026, 21:07 UTC≈8,390 views77 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

График Маримекко считается достаточно сложным и узкоспециализированным. Но тут сделан так хорошо, что легко будет понят и теми, кто не знает что такое график Маримекко. #датавизприемы

65👍12

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

21 Mar 2026, 08:15 UTC≈6,700 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Шапка NYT прямо сейчас с грубой ошибкой. Кто угадает что не так? UPD. Правильный ответ в комментариях. А к чему это? К тому, что даже лучшие из лучших ошибаются. И это нормально

🤔1510

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

11 Mar 2026, 16:41 UTC≈7,210 views140 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @bankstaPhoto

На немецком телевидении 17% партии «Альтернатива для Германии» оказались меньше 11% партии «Зелёных». @banksta

😁96👏16🤡125🤔4🔥2🤬2🥰2

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @chartomojka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 193,096 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Чартомойка” (@chartomojka), 14,888 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chartomojka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.