Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -128. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 157,346–157,512 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 14:43
157,365
-37
14 Aug 2026, 22:07
157,402
-41
13 Aug 2026, 11:34
157,443
-8
12 Aug 2026, 12:46
157,451
+84
11 Aug 2026, 09:36
157,367
-2
10 Aug 2026, 07:11
157,369
-10
9 Aug 2026, 07:51
157,379
-54
8 Aug 2026, 04:13
157,433
-36
7 Aug 2026, 06:35
157,469
-24
6 Aug 2026, 08:19
157,493
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 24 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
124
Videos
67
Links
209
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
7m 30s
Average length
3m 45s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,593 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,609
35.0%
❤
1,601
34.9%
⚡
227
4.94%
🔥
220
4.79%
😎
201
4.38%
🤷♂
136
2.96%
🤔
116
2.53%
🐳
87
1.89%
👀
63
1.37%
👌
48
1.05%
🤩
48
1.05%
🤓
46
1.00%
🆒
44
0.958%
🎉
36
0.784%
🥰
34
0.74%
👏
30
0.653%
💯
27
0.588%
🏆
18
0.392%
😇
2
0.044%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,593reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2024 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 19 we hold a reading for · 37%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cambridgematerials. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 September 2024 to 28 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#IELTSAcademicWritingOfficial
The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
How do the IELTS examiners assess the Academic Writing Test? And what criteria do you need to meet to achieve IELTS Band 5, 6 and 7 in Writing?…
🎵#SongsForLearningEnglish
Want to learn English through song?
An IELTS playlist with recommendations to improve your band score!
BAND 5
🎵Beautiful things - Benson Boone
🎵Easy on me - Adele
🎵Perfect - Ed Sheeran
BAND 7
🎵All of me - John Legend
🎵Dreams - Fleetwood Mac
🎵Firework - Katy Perry
BAND 9
🎧Tightrope - Janelle Monae
🎧Clocks - Coldplay
🎧All to Well - Taylor Swift
Source: #ieltsofficial
#ShareWithYourFriend…
☑️ Corrections with explanations
1.
The issue here is with the number. Even though the table says the data is measured in thousands, when we use a specific number, this word is not pluralised. Therefore, the sentence should say:
In 2008, Australia had the highest amount of students with a part-time job, with 14 thousand.
2.
The problem with sentence is that the writer has mentioned ‘declined steadily’, when in fact…
🎓 What IELTS score do you need for your Dream Destination?
Australia 🇦🇺
🔹 For undergraduate or diploma - Overall band score of 6 or 6.5
🔸 For postgraduate- Overall band score of 6.5, and even each section should have at least 6 bands
Canada 🇨🇦
🔹 All degrees - Total score of 6.5 and minimum of 6 per section
UK 🇬🇧
🔹 Undergraduate degree - a minimum score of 6.5. However, you must have band score of 7.0 or higher…
Here some sample responses for the IELTS writing task 1 question above:
🔸 In 2008, Australia had the highest amount of students with a part-time job, with 14 thousands.
🔸 The quantity of Australian students with a part-time job declined steadily, from 14,000 in 2008 to 11,000 in 2016.
🔸 However, in 2016, Australia decreased and had a figure of 11,000.
🔸 New Zealand had a larger amount of high school students with…
A fully updated 🔄 edition of the best-selling Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary.
It includes up-to-date vocabulary, clear definitions, hundreds of pictures and illustrations, and a new 'Focus on Writing' section. Informed by the Cambridge International Corpus and correlated to English Vocabulary Profile, it is ideal for exam preparation and also features 'Common mistake' boxes, to help learners avoid typical mi…
#Cambridge_Advanced_Learners_dictionary_4th_edition
Key features:
Fully updated 🔄 with 1,500 new words and phrases, including words from the areas of technology, media, language, society, and lifestyle; important words for academic study; important additional words and phrases from American, Indian, Australian and South African English.
Vocabulary is correlated with the English Vocabulary Profile at sense level, s…
#Cambridge_IELTS
VOCABULARY CHALLENGE 7⃣+
👨💻Computer technology
1. Young people ..... new technology more quickly than older people.
2. It is easy to become ..... to social media and ignore the real world.
3. The issue of ..... shows how difficult it is to police the internet
4. My social media contacts are ..... friends, not real ones.
5. New technology doesn't keep its ..... status for very long nowadays.
Opti…
IELTS Writing Task 1: nouns and verbs
Charts and tables usually show nouns rather than verbs. However, you need to find the right verb in order to write a good sentence.
Example:
Picture above 👆
🙅♂Don't write:
- Walking was 255 miles per person in 1985.
- Car was the highest form of transport.
✍Do write:
- The average person walked 255 miles in 1985.
- People travelled more miles by car than by any other form of…
👍136❤90🔥9⚡7🤩6🐳5👌3👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cambridgematerials. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What score would you give to that IELTS WT 2 sample candidate answer?
5.010%
7.016%
6.518%
8.09%
5.57%
6.011%
8.515%
7.513%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2024 to 28 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 433,433 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
📚 Cambridge IELTS Library @cambridge_library · 126,261 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
English @English_IBPS_PO_Clerk_SSC_CGL_GK · 184,609 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cambridge IELTS practice |Official™” (@cambridgematerials), 157,365 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cambridgematerials.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
