Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Articles in English

@articles_in_English

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

57,907subscribers

+259 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001293013035
TypeChannel
Username@articles_in_English
Description📚Pro Reader Series:👉t.me/+nxQt2_K_17I3MmFi 📗Article books for All Levels:👉 https://t.me/+p3KjamBek-djOWQ6 📊ads:👉 t.me/+43NGLsAgHqg2NzY6 📲contact:👉 @ali21admin
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/articles_in_English

Growth

57,64857,90757,777.57 August 2026 — 57,648 subscribers7 August 2026 — 57,660 subscribers8 August 2026 — 57,696 subscribers9 August 2026 — 57,747 subscribers10 August 2026 — 57,804 subscribers11 August 2026 — 57,858 subscribers12 August 2026 — 57,907 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +259. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57,609–57,946 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:3557,907+49
11 Aug 2026, 15:2257,858+54
10 Aug 2026, 18:3157,804+57
9 Aug 2026, 16:2257,747+51
8 Aug 2026, 15:1657,696+36
7 Aug 2026, 16:5057,660+12
7 Aug 2026, 10:1857,648first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.1%
avg views ÷ 57,907 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,000
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
58
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held58 (1 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total640,660
Reactions total23,102
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
803
Videos
20
Links
90

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

23,102 reactions across 58 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣13,25657.4%
❤‍🔥3,94617.1%
🌚8463.66%
🗿8433.65%
👍8103.51%
🔥7553.27%
💯6522.82%
🤓4992.16%
👀3541.53%
💋2000.866%
💅1610.697%
🤷‍♀1040.45%
🕊890.385%
690.299%
💘470.203%
😎430.186%
🎉400.173%
🤝360.156%
👏340.147%
😍310.134%
18 further kinds2871.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 58 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @articles_in_English. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 58 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈3,770 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤖GEMINI PRO 18 OY — ATIGI 30 000 SO‘M! 🧑‍🎓 Talabalar uchun — o‘qish, tarjima va topshiriqlar 🙈 Freelancerlar uchun — ish va loyihalar 📱 Kontent yaratuvchilar uchun — g‘oya, matn va kreativlar 🚀 AI’dan ko‘proq foydalanishni xohlovchilar uchun 🔥 18 oy Gemini Pro — 30 000 so‘m Lekin uni bepul olish ham mumkin! 👇 . @aiobunabot 🎁 5 ta do‘st taklif qiling → 🤖Canva Pro 1 YIL BE

❤‍🔥14🔥12👍7🗿51🤓1

12 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC≈6,840 views779 reactionsread 12 August 2026

mandat chiqdimi kimlar erga tegadigan bóldi?

🤣644🗿79🎉19🤷‍♀12🌚7👀6💋3🔥3

12 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC≈9,150 views139 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

#article The Advantages and Disadvantages of Homeschooling🧕 School can be a harsh environment, especially for children who do not conform to the prevailing social norms. Many parents choose homeschooling to protect their children from bullying, peer pressure, and toxic environments. 📰@articles_in_english

👍75🗿23❤‍🔥16💯12👀4🔥4👌2🕊2

11 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC≈1,070 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

shu yerda batafsil maʼlumot berilgan https://t.me/+O9uA-vycnOs5Yjli

🔥13👍2

11 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC≈1,190 views33 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ha bazida shunaqa bolgan lekin lkn doim boshlagan ishimni oxiriga yetkazishga harakat qilaman Xudoga shukr oxshadi

❤‍🔥28🔥4👍1

11 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC≈1,520 views46 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

no, pepsi fan🙅‍♂️

👀20🤣19💋3💅2👍1🫡1

11 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,650 views48 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

nma qisin bitta tentak maslahat beringlarchi😂

🤣41💯5👍1🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC≈1,770 views34 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Kordim. men uchun ósha toby brat oynagan Spiderman baribr boshqa daraja 🤭

🔥26💯6👍2

11 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC≈2,070 views78 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

hahha, shu ham qiziqmi😂

🤣69🔥9

11 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC≈2,160 views43 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

Yuzlab, wanna hit 1k

❤‍🔥30🤓9🔥3🤣1

11 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC≈2,350 views18 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

albatta hali tugallanmagan ishlar koʻp

👍13🤣3❤‍🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC≈2,440 views39 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

yes, absolute masterpiece

❤‍🔥27🤓7🤣3🤝2

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @articles_in_English. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 35,158 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ENGLISH PODCASTS 🎧
@Podcast_English_listening · 229,923
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
6 Minute English
@BBCs_6MinuteEnglish · 179,211
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Cambridge IELTS practice |Official™
@cambridgematerials · 157,451
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Multi-Level Record (C2 Level Teacher)
@MultiLevelRecord · 195,993
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Articles in English” (@articles_in_English), 57,907 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/articles_in_English.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.