5 measurements spanning 11 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,972–3,041 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 11:16
3,033
+17
14 Aug 2026, 03:38
3,016
+6
10 Aug 2026, 11:20
3,010
+18
7 Aug 2026, 04:36
2,992
+12
6 Aug 2026, 14:01
2,980
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
102.1%
avg views ÷ 3,033 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,100
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
16 (17 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
40,240
Reactions total
724
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 00:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
871 reactions across 16 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
406
46.6%
🔥
81
9.30%
🤣
74
8.50%
❤🔥
52
5.97%
🥰
39
4.48%
😭
37
4.25%
😁
34
3.90%
👍
32
3.67%
👏
28
3.21%
💯
22
2.53%
⚡
19
2.18%
🙏
19
2.18%
😱
5
0.574%
🎉
4
0.459%
💘
4
0.459%
🤔
4
0.459%
🐳
3
0.344%
✍
2
0.23%
🙊
2
0.23%
🫡
2
0.23%
2 further kinds
2
0.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 871reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I have been receiving questions about who to study for IELTS with. I will drop the names of some of the best instructors - objective opinion, not just because they are my friends.
Innovative Centre leads when it comes to results proportion wise. Relative to the number of the students there, the volume of the 7+ results is highest. That, as a result, makes it the centre with the highest success rate. Do basic math.
…
We have two homes. One that raises us, the other that shapes us.
Samarkand, my home forever, taught me kindness, warmth, respect, upbringing and culture that makes me unique wherever I go. I can proudly speak of my home, of its great people and great history. This is where I will eventually come back and live.
Tampa - I have so much to be grateful for to you. This is where I fell and stood up, got myself injured, a…
TA/GA scholarships:
If you ever decide to pursue specialized master’s degree programs or MBA in the US, you need to understand how you can fund your studies.
Unlike undergraduate applications, where certain universities grant full tuition waivers or full ride scholarships to standout applicants, graduate applications usually expect you to pay. MBAs, in particular, are usually designed for top-level executives or ma…
Someone might need it today:
Stop thinking you have control of everything. There are variables you can control, and there are those you can’t control. Try your ultimate best to take care of what’s in your hands, but never ever dare to blame yourself for what you can’t change. Have faith and tie your camel, and the rest is “peshonadan”.
Happiest birthday to one of my closest friends.
Bobirjon, wishing you all the good things I’d wish for myself. At the age of 22, you achieved what some 28 year olds can’t achieve or couldn’t achieve.
You stayed humble in a room where you could be the loudest voice. You inspired so many young people to reach their full potential. You’ve helped and spread kindness. You’ve been a great friend.
Keep it up. Blessed mar…
Behavior and communication hacks that “mainstream” books won’t teach you:
1) Stop seeking validation. You don’t have to try to fit in or be a fake version of yourself to seek someone’s validation. If you don’t feel right in the room, don’t force yourself to act different. That’s felt intuitively by others in your presence, and it just crushes your respect. Either leave or sit silent, and you’ll get noticed without y…
If we get more public shares, I’ll post more of this internal information only people with experience know. I’ll share them for free, but all I need is more outreach so more people get access to this!
❤38🔥5👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @SukhrobMurodov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 54,598 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Scholarships365.info @scholarships365 · 116,973 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
Cambridge IELTS practice |Official™ @cambridgematerials · 157,365 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
IELTS Cambridge 1-18 Full Package Books @IELTS_CAMBRIDGE1 · 140,491 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
Fan olimpiadalari markazi (FOM) @Fan_olimpiadalari_M · 118,896 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sukhrob’s Blog” (@SukhrobMurodov), 3,033 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SukhrobMurodov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.