Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dilmurod Nazarmatov | 9.0

Channel

Dilmurod Nazarmatov | 9.0

@Dilmurod_nazarmatov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,405subscribers

-231 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001583139376
TypeChannel
Username@Dilmurod_nazarmatov
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Dilmurod_nazarmatov

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,4056,6366,520.57 August 2026 — 6,636 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,636 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,633 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,618 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,614 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,592 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,586 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,558 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,545 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,534 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,517 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,463 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,458 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,443 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,405 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -231. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,370–6,671 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 00:206,405-38
13 Sept 2026, 12:566,443-15
9 Sept 2026, 20:386,458-5
4 Sept 2026, 10:206,463-54
1 Sept 2026, 05:556,517-17
29 Aug 2026, 16:276,534-11
26 Aug 2026, 19:596,545-13
24 Aug 2026, 04:436,558-28
20 Aug 2026, 16:346,586-6
18 Aug 2026, 02:336,592-22
14 Aug 2026, 20:266,614-4
11 Aug 2026, 02:436,618-15
7 Aug 2026, 19:046,633-3
7 Aug 2026, 12:006,636no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:586,636first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,201 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤69057.5%
🔥32326.9%
🎉655.41%
😍373.08%
👍322.66%
💯242.00%
🌚80.666%
🙏60.5%
🤔40.333%
🐳30.25%
👏30.25%
🤣20.167%
🤯20.167%
💔10.083%
🤨10.083%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,201 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 19 we hold a reading for · 37%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Dilmurod_nazarmatov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 January 2026 to 21 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Apr 2026, 14:25 UTC≈29,000 views134 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#studentachievements Ee bollarni eplab bomayaptiku 😁 Reading 9.0 🔥 Writing 7.5 ⚡️

🔥89❤24😍10🎉4💯4👍3

19 Apr 2026, 13:08 UTC≈20,700 views250 reactions6 Starsread 20 August 2026

Here are some interesting facts about the recent results: 1. In writing, five people scored 7.0, one person 7.5 and one 8.0 🔥 2. Four of my students achieved an overall score of 8.0 in a week 💣⏰ 3. Three people scored 9 in listening and two people did the same in reading 📈 “❤️” - “yuqsin yuqsin” button

❤244🔥4🎉1🤯1

19 Apr 2026, 13:02 UTC≈17,500 views62 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#studentachievements Asilbek has been working with me since the Elementary level. But the funny thing is he’d already achieved 6.0 when he first started attending my lessons. Fast forward 9 months and his patience has paid off. 8.0 for his writing was an icing on the cake. ⚡️

🔥31❤23🎉5😍2👍1

19 Apr 2026, 13:02 UTC≈12,600 views33 reactions6 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#studentachievements Islom comes from a family of high achievers. His older brother scored an amazing 8.5, while the younger one got a 7.0. I hope that this result will serve him well in the future.

🔥18❤13🎉2

19 Apr 2026, 13:02 UTC≈12,700 views40 reactions5 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#studentachievements Another success story. Saiddovudxon updated his previous 7.5 (which he had achieved with me). Now he can direct his attention and energy to other subject areas and craft a nice university application.

🔥19❤14👍4🌚1🎉1😍1

19 Apr 2026, 13:02 UTC≈9,650 views31 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#studentachievements Umar has a real knack for languages. It was pleasure to listen to his speaking responses and read his essays. Although we were aiming at 8.5, this is not a bad start for a 15-year-old

🔥16❤11👍3🎉1

19 Apr 2026, 13:02 UTC≈9,370 views31 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#studentachievement I have rarely seen students that progressed as fast as Islom. Having joined my course, he quickly improved his results from 6.5 to 8.0 in just about 4 months 👀⚡️ Just look at those 9s

❤19🔥10🎉2

19 Apr 2026, 11:40 UTC≈8,830 views52 reactionsread 20 August 2026

8️⃣.0️⃣

🎉35❤8🤔4💯3👍1👏1

19 Apr 2026, 11:01 UTC≈9,800 views41 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#studentachievements Kamoliddin had to take the test before our IELTS Graduation course (3 months earlier than most candidates). Just imagine what he could have achieved after studying the final course🤯

❤24🔥13😍3👍1

19 Apr 2026, 11:01 UTC≈7,920 views37 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#studentachievements Saidxon already had excellent language skills when we started working. Unsurprisingly, this helped him a lot in the test and allowed him to pull off this score 🏆

❤20🔥10👍3😍2🌚1💔1

19 Apr 2026, 11:01 UTC≈9,570 views51 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#studentachievements Just like Kamoliddin, Saidaxror was pressed for time, so he too took the test before the end of the course. It was pure joy to work with these guys ❤️

🔥34❤13😍3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Dilmurod_nazarmatov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Everest Official
@everestofficial · 39,525
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026
Dilshodbek Ravshanov (9.0)
@ieltsaidbydilshodbek · 24,165
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 September 2026
Articles in English
@articles_in_English · 59,920
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
IELTS Academy
@IELTS_8 · 56,874
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Siroj notes | 8.5
@Siroj_Notes · 44,074
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
Jo’rabek Sanokulov | IELTS
@ieltswithsanokulov · 55,501
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
LINK
@aslanovs_library · 16
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
IELTS 9.0 √Suhrobjon Abdivaliev
@writing_t · 34,716
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026
Teacher Sardor | Writing 8.5 (T2)
@teacheersardor · 21,392
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 September 2026
Ozodbek's IELTS
@ozodbek_sk · 43,202
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
BM | IELTS 9.0
@BekzodMirahmedov · 43,728
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
IELTS Cambridge 1-18 Full Package Books
@IELTS_CAMBRIDGE1 · 141,563
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
Cambridge IELTS practice |Official™
@cambridgematerials · 157,578
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Find Your Way
@findyourway_media · 33,718
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 September 2026
IELTS Cambridge Practice
@cambridgepractice · 40,488
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
Alisher’s IELTS | 9.0
@alisher_abduvohobov · 100,344
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
Cambridge Dictionary
@cambridge_dic · 48,243
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
REAL EXAM PAPERS
@mindless_writer · 80,934
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
Ielts topic-based vocabulary
@topic_based_vocabulary · 24,215
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026
IELTS IDP in Uzbekistan
@examsuz · 24,173
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 September 2026
Jasurbek's blog|| BackUp
@jasurbekisaev · 1,227
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 7 September 2026
Speaking for IELTS | Lifestyle
@Khusan57 · 98,973
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
IELTS CDI Report
@cdireport · 43,019
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
IELTS SPEAKING ASSISTANT APP QUESTIONS
@IELTS_Speaking_Assistant_App · 53,291
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 56 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dilmurod Nazarmatov | 9.0” (@Dilmurod_nazarmatov), 6,405 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dilmurod_nazarmatov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.