Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Valera Notes

Channel

Valera Notes

@valeranotes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,556subscribers

-43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001188644050
TypeChannel
Username@valeranotes
Description👨‍🎓Yale-NUS graduate of Politics, Economics, and Philosophy 📌Relevant links: https://linktr.ee/freshmanacademy 🗽Preparing students for the Ivy League at @freshmanblog 💬Chat: @valeranotes_chat 📫@valerafreshman 🎥IG: https://instagram.com/arakelyanvalera
Created29 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/valeranotes

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,5567,8277,691.57 August 2026 — 7,599 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,599 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,597 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,686 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,697 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,702 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,800 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,825 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,827 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,822 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,800 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,774 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,753 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,754 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,729 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,716 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,683 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,658 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,637 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,618 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,600 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,580 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,574 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,568 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,561 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,556 subscribers7 August 20267 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 92 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,515–7,868 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 07:477,556-5
4 Nov 2026, 07:297,561-7
1 Nov 2026, 11:307,568-6
29 Oct 2026, 00:477,574-6
26 Oct 2026, 01:067,580-20
23 Oct 2026, 07:367,600-18
20 Oct 2026, 18:197,618-19
17 Oct 2026, 13:147,637-21
14 Oct 2026, 07:577,658-25
10 Oct 2026, 20:557,683-33
5 Oct 2026, 02:597,716-13
26 Sept 2026, 10:217,729-25
15 Sept 2026, 19:377,754+1
12 Sept 2026, 12:407,753-21
8 Sept 2026, 17:217,774-26
3 Sept 2026, 01:077,800-22
30 Aug 2026, 15:257,822-5
27 Aug 2026, 16:127,827+2
24 Aug 2026, 19:247,825+25
20 Aug 2026, 19:167,800first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
59.7%
avg views ÷ 7,556 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,510
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held60 (26 June 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total45,080
Reactions total1,010
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 02:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
693
Videos
73
Links
300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 44s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,501 reactions across 60 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,85959.4%
💯78512.1%
🔥69510.7%
❤‍🔥3335.12%
👍3194.91%
🥰1562.40%
🤯731.12%
🕊681.05%
😎450.692%
💔390.6%
🏆360.554%
🤩240.369%
😍230.354%
👏160.246%
🍾150.231%
🎉150.231%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,501 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 08:58 UTC≈1,010 views98 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @husanmdPhoto

We got into Y Combinator! After dropping out and rejecting term sheets that worth up to $2M, it was the riskiest decision to go forth. Yet, we went all in. Thank you everyone who supported during the journey.

❤77🔥21

30 Oct 2026, 07:53 UTC≈4,130 views109 reactionsread 11 November 2026

⚡️Annual Reminder: University Deadlines are on November 1st at midnight, NOT October 31st.

❤97🔥10💯2

24 Oct 2026, 17:57 UTC≈5,690 views99 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

My full mini-lecture at Webster University.

❤‍🔥49🔥29❤12🕊7💯2

21 Oct 2026, 17:24 UTC≈6,380 views194 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

New Al-Kwarizmis, Avicennas, and Beruniys incoming

❤151🔥25💯18

21 Oct 2026, 16:34 UTC≈4,890 views97 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤯55❤39🔥2❤‍🔥1

16 Oct 2026, 14:46 UTC≈5,530 views134 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

One unexpected perk of attending my mini-lecture at Webster was getting to see my alien-looking childhood photo.

❤88🔥28😍9🥰7👍2

15 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC≈4,830 views33 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Team at Webster has opened the talk to everyone interested. 📅 Friday, October 16, 2026 (tomorrow) 🕑 2:00 PM 📍 Grand Hall, Webster University Tashkent https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfb7EKo575XmFR8KmXxOgHEd4-NIa2lGJE83up3grdp_91dCA/viewform

❤27🥰5🔥1

13 Oct 2026, 10:59 UTC≈4,420 views98 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Above is a short summary of my proposed lecture topic that I sent to the organizers. Would you join a more abstract lecture like this? P.S. Not the best idea to commit to this in the middle of admissions season. But we be living for these things.

❤75🔥23

13 Oct 2026, 10:56 UTC≈4,660 views92 reactionsread 11 November 2026

"The World Is Built on Stories. Most of Them Aren't True. Valera Arakelyan Yale-NUS Graduate in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics Founder of Freshman Academy When we think of mythology, we imagine ancient Greece, Egypt, or India. Yet our world is built on myths: identity, money, progress, social mobility, and many more. In this lecture, Valera Arakelyan will explore how the most powerful stories are those we no…

❤70🔥22

13 Oct 2026, 10:56 UTC≈3,540 views56 reactionsread 11 November 2026

I was invited to give a lecture at Webster University. I could have given another talk on admissions or "successful success". But, this time, I wanted to shake things up.

❤45🔥11

10 Oct 2026, 09:36 UTC≈4,450 views31 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Great argument by Prof. Gio that "solving a problem is not necessarily the same as advancing science." Would advise watching everyone interested in AI's recent advances in mathematics. https://youtu.be/KqiDqJMxg6o?si=hQhm2qFzbXM7OaJ4

❤25💯3🔥3

9 Oct 2026, 14:24 UTC≈3,910 views50 reactionsread 11 November 2026

President John Sexton is one of the founding fathers of NYU Abu Dhabi and mastermind behind NYU’s global expansion. He kindly agreed to speak with Imkon Scholars students. So we decided to open the discussion to everyone interested.

❤46🤯4

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @valeranotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ahror
@acceptthyself · 64,213
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 29 August 2026
Asalkhon Sharipova | Grants
@asalkhon_sharipova · 18,636
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 September 2026
F1 visa interview Experiences ❁
@f1interviewreviews · 74,609
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 25 August 2026
Scholarships Corner
@scholarshipscorner · 175,314
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
DSATuz | TopTierPrep | ACE your exam
@DSATuz · 37,027
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 2 September 2026
Big Think
@BigThink_tg · 21,678
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 21 September 2026
IELTS Cambridge 1-18 Full Package Books
@IELTS_CAMBRIDGE1 · 143,924
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
👩‍🎓Free Scholarships
@scholarship · 51,347
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 August 2026
Cambridge IELTS practice |Official™
@cambridgematerials · 157,729
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
My IELTS materials!
@IELTSmaterials_N1 · 32,699
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
Opportunities Corners
@opcorners · 61,098
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
Opportunities Circle (scholarships fellowshowships internships exchange programs )
@opportunitiescircleofficial · 100,987
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
Dilshodbek Ravshanov (9.0)
@ieltsaidbydilshodbek · 24,718
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 September 2026
Scholarships365.info
@scholarships365 · 117,258
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
SAT Files 📚
@SAT_FILES · 26,652
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 September 2026
Behruz's Blog
@behruz_american · 16
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 16 September 2026
Grantlar.uz
@grantlar · 79,399
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
BM | IELTS 9.0
@BekzodMirahmedov · 42,568
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Sarcasm
@sarcasm9 · 60,869
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
Alex (IELTS 9)
@AlexNativeIELTS · 19,152
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
U.S. Embassy Tashkent
@USAUzbekistan · 29,415
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
"El-yurt umidi" Foundation
@elyurtumidifoundation · 32,741
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 September 2026
Jo’rabek Sanokulov | IELTS
@ieltswithsanokulov · 53,262
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Edu Grands
@edugrandsuz · 33,069
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 44 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Valera Notes” (@valeranotes), 7,556 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valeranotes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.