Channel
@AkbarjonsIELTS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
633subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002195177787 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AkbarjonsIELTS |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AkbarjonsIELTS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 633 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 639 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 639 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 June 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,904 |
| Reactions total | 82 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
259 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 73 | 28.2% | |
| 👍 | 46 | 17.8% | |
| 😁 | 38 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5411308619981410664 | 30 | 11.6% | |
| 💯 | 27 | 10.4% | |
| 👏 | 23 | 8.88% | |
| custom 5260696714049775428 | 7 | 2.70% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 2.70% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 1.16% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 1.16% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.772% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 259reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The population of many cities is growing rapidly. What are the effects of this growth on people living in these cities? What can be done to maintain their quality of life? Urban population is booming in many parts of the world these days. While the potential consequences may result in lower living standards, I believe that creating more green spaces in cities as well as building more facilities in rural areas would …
🔥7😍1
It’s not over until I win
💯17🔥3custom 54113086199814106643
a centralized government one government controlling or governing the whole world markazlashgan hukumat the entire globe the whole world butun dunyo sovereign nation an independent country that governs itself suveren / mustaqil davlat proposition a suggested idea or plan taklif / ilgari surilgan g‘oya merits advantages or positive aspects afzalliklar / ijobiy jihatlar rapid advancements very fast progress or developme…
🔥4
Today family members eat fewer meals together. Is this a positive or negative trend? Admittedly, it is becoming less common for families to share meals together. While this development may seem desirable in some respects, I believe it is largely a change for the worse. It can be argued that having occasional family meals can be favorable. Family gatherings are often time-consuming as they involve time for bonding, …
🔥4
share a meal birga ovqatlanmoq / birga ovqatlanish to some extent ma’lum darajada a change for the worse yomon tomonga o‘zgarish desirable istalgan / ma’qul / foydali time-consuming ko‘p vaqt talab qiladigan accompanied by ... bilan birga keladigan / ... bilan birga bo‘ladigan a nuisance noqulaylik / bezovtalik / ovora qiladigan narsa pressed for ... yetishmayotgan / ... tanqisligida burdened with ... bilan qiynalayo…
👏3🔥2custom 54113086199814106642
📢 Useful #vocabulary ➖ Favorable - advantageous Although this development can be favorable, ... ➖ It can be argued that - it can be said that It can be argued that building houses instead of green spaces in urban areas is an economic necessity. ➖ a nuisance - annoyance Traffic jams are a nuisance ➖ To be pressed for something - nimadir yetishmayotgan People who are pressed for time often choose fast food ➖ Burdened …
🔥3
The bar chart breaks down the gender composition of staff at a particular educational institution in 2008. Overall, while science subjects were mainly dominated by males, females took the lead in social subjects. The share of males was particularly pronounced in Engineering compared to History which was largely female-led. Looking at fields which featured mostly male staff, Engineering was by far the most male domi…
👍3
Some feel governments should invest in preserving minority languages, while others feel this is not a good use of resources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Some share the view that public funds should be used to preserve minority languages, but others object to this idea, stating that these funds can be put to better use. While funding language conservation efforts with taxpayer money may seem unreas…
🔥2custom 54113086199814106642👍1
📢 Useful #vocabulary ➖ Some share the view that .... while others object to this idea, stating that ... Some share the view that governments should bear the responsibility for reducing air pollution in urban areas, while others object to this idea/suggestion, stating that individual efforts should take precedence. ➖ be put to better use - can be used more efficiently Instead of investing billions in space explorati…
🔥3
📢 Useful #vocabulary ➖There is no denying that - admittedly There is no denying that technology has revolutionized the way people communicate. ➖ Hold sway over - have influence on Globalization increasingly holds sway over dressing styles as fashion trends spread quickly across countries. ➖ can be interpreted as + adjective - can be considered as adj The growing popularity of online learning can be interpreted as a …
👍5custom 52606967140497754282🔥1😍1
📢 Useful #vocabulary ➖ take precedence - be prioritized Public health should take precedence when it comes to allocating the government's financial resources. ➖ contend - think, believe I contend that individual efforts are essential to tackling environmental problems. ➖ hold merit - have value, be worth Although both views hold merit, I contend that mitigating air pollution is a shared responsibility. ➖ promote a s…
custom 54113086199814106647custom 52606967140497754284💔2
🪄 My way or the highway 🪄 📝 Do you know this phrase?
🔥10👏6🐳3custom 54113086199814106643💯2custom 52606967140497754281
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AkbarjonsIELTS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,420,413 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mr Akbarjon | IELTS 8.0” (@AkbarjonsIELTS), 633 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AkbarjonsIELTS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.