Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

IELTS | Atabaev | 9.0

@ielts_atabaev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,366subscribers

-115 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001994648394
TypeChannel
Username@ielts_atabaev
DescriptionIELTS courses online and offline by @atabaevlaziz L:9.0 R:9.0 W:9.0 S:9.0
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ielts_atabaev

Growth

19,36619,48119,423.56 August 2026 — 19,481 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,481 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,478 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,450 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,440 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,407 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,396 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,380 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,366 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -115. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,349–19,498 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:1819,366-14
12 Aug 2026, 12:5419,380-16
11 Aug 2026, 15:5719,396-11
10 Aug 2026, 19:1219,407-33
9 Aug 2026, 16:2519,440-10
8 Aug 2026, 14:2419,450-28
7 Aug 2026, 15:4619,478-3
6 Aug 2026, 20:1519,481no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:0519,481first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 5 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.0%
avg views ÷ 19,366 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,810
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held23 (5 May 20269 August 2026)
Views total40,690
Reactions total686
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
107
Videos
14
Links
65

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
32m 25s
Average length
32m 25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,277 reactions across 21 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥76823.4%
66620.3%
👍41012.5%
🎉33210.1%
🤣2377.23%
1765.37%
😭1765.37%
❤‍🔥1454.42%
🤯752.29%
👏531.62%
🗿431.31%
🤔411.25%
💯300.915%
👌230.702%
170.519%
🤩150.458%
😱140.427%
130.397%
🐳130.397%
🤓60.183%
6 further kinds240.732%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,277reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC≈1,430 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔥 Tez qo‘shilib olinglar! ✍️ Writing Task 2 ning barcha savol turlari boshidan oxirigacha to‘liq o‘rgatilgan! 📚

11😱2

9 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC≈1,830 views33 reactionsread 10 August 2026

A friend of mine is sharing some good content for free. Care to join?

👍13115😭4

9 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC≈1,850 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔥 IELTS WRITING TASK 2 KANALI ✍️ Task 2 uchun 32 ta eng kerakli dars — barchasi bir joyda! 🏆 IELTS Writing 8.5 egasi Shahzod Abdiev tomonidan tayyorlangan. 📚 Darslar 📝 Essaylar 🔥 Vocabulary 🎯 Band 8–9 strategiyalar 🚀 Tezroq qo‘shiling! 🔗 Kanal: https://t.me/+ZhRMK6YBx5xkMDFi https://t.me/+ZhRMK6YBx5xkMDFi https://t.me/+ZhRMK6YBx5xkMDFi

13🔥6😭3

7 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC≈4,030 views74 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Word formation mistakes in IELTS Writing A word formation mistake happens when you know the right word but use the wrong form of it. ❌ The government should focus on the develop of public transport. ✅ The government should focus on the development of public transport. ❌ The number of cars increased significant. ✅ The number of cars increased significantly. Think in word families: develop -> development -> develo

👍3526🔥9❤‍🔥31

5 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈8,070 views216 reactionsread 14 August 2026

One of the most underrated ways to improve your IELTS Listening and Reading is surprisingly simple: Do the tests without looking at the questions. Instead of constantly searching for answers, just focus on understanding. 🎧 For Listening, simply listen to the recording from beginning to end as if it were a podcast. 📖 For Reading, read the passage like you would read an interesting article. When you’re not distrac

❤‍🔥9960🔥3410👍6🌚3😍2🕊1

29 Jul 2026, 04:27 UTC≈9,380 views217 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Band 9.0 tip. If you feel like your vocabulary bank is good enough but you are still failing to get 9.0 in R and L, then what will help you master these modules is understanding how these tests are created. Seeing patterns and traps so to say. This comes naturally if your pattern recognition is strong, but if not, you might need to learn a few tricks. For example, one way you lose your points is that you listen and

👍97🔥5836💯176🤔2❤‍🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 03:00 UTC≈14,100 views111 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

#writing #mysample The graph compares the number of participants in five different activities at a social center in Melbourne, Australia, from 2000 to 2020. Overall, the graph indicates noticeable variations in the participation trends over the timeframe, with the film club consistently exhibiting the highest number of participants. Also, table tennis and musical performances saw significant rises, while amateur dra

5829🔥104🤯42🥰2👍1

22 May 2026, 07:00 UTC≈30,400 views145 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

This is one of my video lessons as part of Marathon 2.0. To access more of these, join my current Marathon 3.0 only for 100.000UzS.

822413👏7🤣7🤓6👍2🔥2

21 May 2026, 10:18 UTC≈26,600 views49 reactionsread 14 August 2026

The course starts tomorrow. Will be explaining how to ace pie charts. You can still join the course both with feedback or without it. @atabaevlaziz

👍30🔥134🤯2

18 May 2026, 14:33 UTC≈24,400 views95 reactionsread 14 August 2026

The Task 2 essay prompts I got on my exams: 1) Banning extreme sports. 2) Robots x2. 3) Higher salary for CEOs. 4) Global sports events. 5) People are often moving. You know what’s cool? I had prepared for these questions before my exam or had done them with my students. When you buy my courses, you also get a chance to work with recent actual tasks. @atabaevlaziz

50❤‍🔥27👍9👏5🥰3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @ielts_atabaev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 May 2026, 09:22 UTCAnonymous Quiz501 voters

Does this statement agree with the claims of the writer? As expected, the artworks chosen for the exhibition reflect a narrow interpretation of landscape.

  1. Yes38%
  2. No48%
  3. Not Given14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 193,230 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Cambridge IELTS practice |Official™
@cambridgematerials · 157,443
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
IELTS Cambridge 1-18 Full Package Books
@IELTS_CAMBRIDGE1 · 140,453
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
6 Minute English
@BBCs_6MinuteEnglish · 179,452
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
📚 Cambridge IELTS Library
@cambridge_library · 126,283
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
ENGLISH PODCASTS 🎧
@Podcast_English_listening · 229,935
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
Multi-Level Record (C2 Level Teacher)
@MultiLevelRecord · 195,901
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
Abror Rahmatullayev
@AbrorRahmatullayev · 133,231
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IELTS | Atabaev | 9.0” (@ielts_atabaev), 19,366 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ielts_atabaev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.