8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,162–21,233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 14:09
21,170
-16
13 Aug 2026, 02:14
21,186
-9
12 Aug 2026, 02:53
21,195
-21
11 Aug 2026, 04:03
21,216
-9
10 Aug 2026, 05:11
21,225
+11
9 Aug 2026, 05:01
21,214
-7
8 Aug 2026, 07:36
21,221
-3
7 Aug 2026, 13:15
21,224
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 21,170 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,000
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
13 (17 July 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
52,010
Reactions total
1,493
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,260
Videos
≈104
Links
≈392
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 58s
Average length
1m 39s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,493 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
996
66.7%
💋
180
12.1%
💅
151
10.1%
💘
84
5.63%
🍓
82
5.49%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,493reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Скупила я как-то одним днем все термостойкие туши на обзор, которые мне попались на просторах маркетплейса. Че там только нет, но сейчас пищу больше всего от этой и еще парочки
В двух словах: тушь невероятно удлиняет (настолько, что не верится, что это мои ресницы), идеально смывается чулочками без черных кругов, не отпечатываться в течение дня на веке и не осыпается. Все остальное — на видео в посте.
Попробовала я…
Мои любимые помады в стиле бимбо/milky lips. Те самые, о которых спрашивают тыщу раз на дню. Моя влажная мечта, чтобы такое видео залетело на огромные просмотры и я просто бахнула его в закреп. А то скоро придется на лоб себе приклеить 😀
Firin 938 (любимочки, вот если вам реально понравилась эта помада в обзоре — берите, пока дают. Если зайдете в вопросы к товару, афигеете, сколько раз спрашивали именно про 938 отте…
Не знаю как вы, а я жоска недооценивала силу Авито в плане косметики. И это не кринж
Особенно, когда ты бьюти-блогер и покупаешь косметику на обзоры ну почти постоянно, успеть за всем просто нереально, использовать всё — тоже нереально. Я прекрасно понимаю, что почти любая косметика, какой бы клёвой она ни была, всё равно будет лежать на полке и пылиться. Тогда за какой хуй мне платить за новые румяна 3к, когда я мо…
Продукты, которые были использованы для макияжа глаз:
Консилер Catrice
Палетка Love Generation
Палетка Relouis
Палетка Beauty Bomb
Каял Vivienne Sabo
Однушка-сияшка Art-Visage
Тушь RAD синяя
Губы:
Карандаш Golden Rose
Помада Essence caring
SHINE vegan collagen 206
Перламутровая помада Nice View
Если полезно, то буду рада 🤍
С утра пораньше защищаю кандидатскую диссертацию на тему: «Почему тональный крем за 300 рублей не обязан быть опасным». Сижу в шоке, мягко говоря.
Да, за 300 рублей действительно продается огромное количество говна. В том числе косметика без необходимых документов и без прохождения предусмотренных процедур оценки соответствия. Но из этого совершенно не следует, что абсолютно любая косметика за 300 рублей автоматичес…
Идеальный вечер понедельника — это 893кк за час езды на велике. С избыточным весом всё дается нелегко, но я в очередной раз выжила (к несчастью для хейтеров) 🐱
Кстати, если вдруг у вас по какой-то причине еще нет велика, вы многое теряете! Например, кучу позитивных эмоций и красивых видов. Одно из эффективных лекарств от тоски и хронического стресса
Летом кожа головы жирнится тупа в два раза быстрее, чем обычно. Даже я, как чел, который моет голову не каждый день и даже не через день в обычное время, летом делаю это намного чаще
На такой случай у ART&FACT есть прикольный шампунь глубокой очистки, который меня выручает. Тщательно очищает кожу головы (особенно, когда жестко потеешь и кажется, что обычный шампунь не делает примерно ничего), немного охлаждает и д…
Я счастлива жить в реальности, в которой блеск для губ за 250 рублей делает больше, чем блеск за несколько тысяч рублей
Как он работает на губах покажу в комментариях, там будет видео. Это масло-блеск, поэтому текстура не обволакивающая, а скорее чуть жидковатая и маслянистая, но даже при этом продукт не пытается потечь за контур губ и не доставляет дискомфорт. Да, сияющие частички тут ощущаются чуть больше, чем в л…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @callmegelik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
DaSHuk @ShulginaDa · 152,275 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Геля бьюти фея” (@callmegelik), 21,170 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/callmegelik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
