National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 9 days, net +738. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 419,164–423,298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 02:57
420,379
-21
14 Aug 2026, 13:35
420,400
-122
13 Aug 2026, 03:04
420,522
-584
12 Aug 2026, 04:54
421,106
-598
11 Aug 2026, 05:46
421,704
-621
10 Aug 2026, 04:11
422,325
-496
9 Aug 2026, 06:41
422,821
+1,269
8 Aug 2026, 02:48
421,552
+1,911
7 Aug 2026, 07:15
419,641
first reading
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 420,379 subscribers
Avg views / post
75,100
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
59 (3 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
4,431,300
Reactions total
332,027
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9m 17s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
332,027 reactions across 59 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
119,341
35.9%
❤
62,963
19.0%
😨
16,090
4.85%
😭
15,319
4.61%
👎
15,122
4.55%
🤣
14,523
4.37%
🥰
13,536
4.08%
🤬
13,214
3.98%
🖕
11,512
3.47%
😱
8,697
2.62%
🤯
7,926
2.39%
😢
6,837
2.06%
💅
5,781
1.74%
🔥
3,567
1.07%
💔
3,150
0.949%
👍
2,318
0.698%
🙏
1,829
0.551%
🤔
1,732
0.522%
❤🔥
1,593
0.48%
😡
1,411
0.425%
27 further kinds
5,566
1.68%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 332,027reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
108
across the posts below
Posts paid on
27
of 59 we hold a reading for · 46%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vgostyaxman. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 59 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎧Глеба «Три дня дождя» вновь заметили угашенным.
15 августа 2026 года Глеба, лидера группы «Три дня дождя», заметили на концерте коллектива «Хоффманиты» в странном состоянии — предположительно, нетрезвом. Это произошло на фоне недавних сообщений о лечении артиста от зависимости.
Да ешабит он дор*жки свои. Кто-то еще верит этому хуесосу?
🎧Несовершеннолетний студент приговорен к 4 годам воспитательной колонии за публикации в Telegram
Суд признал 17-летнего студента виновным по статьям, связанным с публичным оправданием терроризма и демонстрацией символики запрещенных организаций.
По данным следствия, обвиняемый разместил в администрируемом им Telegram-канале изображение с символикой запрещенного объединения, а также записал и выложил голосовое сообщ…
🎧Клещ впился девушке в анус, когда она пошла в туалет в кустах.
Девушка рассказала в своем блоге, что почувствовала дискомфорт и попросила подругу посмотреть, что там.
Подруга нашла клеща вокруг ануса.
🎧В 2027 году в России запустят сервис «Насильник-Педофил», пишет «Кровавая барыня»
МВД будет вносить в базу осуждённых за преступления против половой неприкосновенности несовершеннолетних. В реестре также будут храниться доказательства из их уголовных дел.
🎧Слушал через VPN: на 19-летнего парня составили протокол за запрещённый трек
В Кургане силовики обратили внимание на музыкальные вкусы 19-летнего местного жителя. На юношу составили административный протокол за прослушивание аудиозаписи, признанной в России экстремистской.
По версии полиции, парень намеренно обходил блокировки с помощью VPN-сервиса, чтобы найти и воспроизвести запрещённую композицию.
За прослушив…
Куда бы вы отправились прямо сейчас, если бы можно было выбрать любую страну?
На летней вечеринке журнала Правила жизни гости оставляли свои ответы на специальной стене. Италия, Япония, Бразилия, путешествие по России — список желаний быстро рос в течение всего вечера.
Рядом расположилась зона Велгии Эко с большой матрёшкой и мастер-классом, где можно было собрать собственное украшение из бус.
Велгия Эко — препара…
🎧Instagram* впервые за десятилетие обновила свой визуальный стиль.
Как заявил глава платформы, при работе над логотипом дизайнеры стремились сделать его «чище и современнее», сохранив при этом преемственность с оригинальной версией. Изменения носят эволюционный, а не радикальный характер.
Запрещенная организация в рф*
🎧В сеть слили фото и персональные данные клиентов фитнес-клуба DDX.
Как утверждают СМИ, в утечке также есть даты и время посещений, количество визитов, данные о покупках и адреса клубов. Информация уже начала расходиться на закрытых площадках, которые продают данные.
Знакомые лица:)
🎧Медведев назвал придурками молодых россиян, которые не поддерживают страну.
Посмотрите, какое количество придурков вынесло на свет Божий вот в этот очень сложный, драматический период!
🎧Российские ИИ проверят на соответствие традиционным ценностям — критерии оценки разработают Минцифры, ФСБ и ФСТЭК
Эксперты будут анализировать, насколько ответы нейросетей соответствуют духовно-нравственным ценностям, не раскрывают ли они лишнюю информацию и отвечают ли поставленным государством целям.
🎧Сервис поиска мест на кладбище появится на «Госуслугах»
С 1 декабря на госпортале можно будет найти и купить место для захоронения, пишет «Коммерсант» со ссылкой на документы Минцифры.
😊😊😊
🤡3,010❤288👀221🤣104😐89🗿60🥰32👍12
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @vgostyaxman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@vgostyaxman edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 65,073 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ох @theohdaily · 179,184 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 August 2026
Истории со скорой @komarova_88 · 116,052 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
Ваша Госпожа @GOSPOSHA_EVELIN · 112,503 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 14 August 2026
SHTOLL NEWS💋 @SHTOLLNEWS · 519,307 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 9 August 2026
[Long Chik] Плохие новости, Криминальные новости @Long_Chik1 · 109,934 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
Darkland @darklandpark · 137,454 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 August 2026
небога от бога @neboga_ot_boga · 104,659 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 August 2026
Чезоид @chezzoid · 126,766 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
folwixxx | темы и стикеры @f3lvixx · 155,817 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TIGMAN” (@vgostyaxman), 420,379 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vgostyaxman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.