вообще я врач-организатор здравоохранения, а так балуюсь разоблачениями и избавляю от прыщей через док.мед.
консультация по уходу — https://janeyashan.ru/consultation
обучение для косметологов — https://janeyashan.ru/skinstitut
🗳️реклама @prjaneyashan
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +117. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,448–15,602 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 12:45
15,584
+26
11 Aug 2026, 11:55
15,558
+44
10 Aug 2026, 10:35
15,514
+37
9 Aug 2026, 11:33
15,477
+6
8 Aug 2026, 13:33
15,471
+5
7 Aug 2026, 15:35
15,466
-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:46
15,467
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.1%
avg views ÷ 15,584 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,220
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
19 (23 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
80,230
Reactions total
1,603
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,280
Videos
≈586
Links
≈753
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
50s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,603 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,148
71.6%
🔥
298
18.6%
💯
157
9.79%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,603reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @janeyashan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
никогда бы не подумала, что буду готова вывалить такие бабки на увлажнялки для губ, но отчаянные времена на СР требуют отчаянных мер, поэтому ловите обзор на оверпрайснутые блески
*️⃣Gisou Honey Infused Hydrating Lip oil дает хорошую окклюзию и смягчение за счет эмолентов и масел, причем с очень хорошим содержанием жирных кислот: преимущественно линолевая, γ-линоленовая, олеиновая, а фишка бренда мёд Мирсалехи притя…
стоит ли брать транексамовую кислоту и какую?
транексамка не просто осветляющий актив, в первую очередь, это лекарственное средство, которое сначала применяли как только кровоостанавливающее, но случайно обнаружили его отбеливающий эффект и так начали лечить им мелазму и другую пигментацию в виде таблеток, инъекций и даже местно, то есть нанося на кожу
производители косметики не могли упустить такие возможности акт…
к любым новинкам Openface уже по дефолту отношусь с нетерпением скорее их попробовать, потому что из постоянных рекомендаций для тела на консультациях обязательно будут их средства в том числе, а сама я ежедневно юзаю их антиперспирант с кислотами Sweet Not Sweat уже с 2024 года, поэтому увидев дроп сразу двух новых банок для подмышек, не могла пройти мимо и не затестить
🟤дезодорант-антиперспирант с постбиотиками Sw…
вот вам яркий пример, когда гиперкератоз на коже лечат как розацеа и ждут результата 😐
не так давно рассказывала вам, как часто между собой путают акне, розацеа, гиперкератоз, этот список справедливо дополнили малассезией («грибковым» акне) — пост тогда взялся не с пустого места, а все после того, как мы Иришке составили схему ухода против гиперкератоза и вот спустя неделю видим положительную динамику
почему все-та…
кто-то занимается спортом ради подтянутой фигуры, я занимаюсь им, чтобы в свои почти 30 тупо встать с кровати
несмотря на много лет хореографической школы и спортзала, мне нечем похвастаться в плане осанки и мышечного каркаса, который бы держал эту самую осанку, потому что остальные 12 часов в сутки за компом в позе креветки решают, какой позвонок заболит следующим— поэтому год назад я все это бросила к чертям и нач…
три бюджетные банки, которыми активно пользовалась за последний месяц и которые стоят каждую свою копеечку:
🟠гиалуроновая сыворотка Elementary с 4-мя формами гиалуроновой кислоты, успокаивающими пантенолом и аллантоином, глицерин и гликоль дают слегка гелеобразную текстуру, а вместе с гиалуронкой они делают кожу мерцающей, ту самую глоу скин — простая приятная увлажняющая баночка, которая впишется в абсолютно любой …
игнорить уход за кожей головы во время курса системных ретиноидов (СР) такая же плохая идея ровно как и игнорировать уход за кожей лица и тела — последствий не оберешься
поэтому на фоне появившейся стремной побочки у меня в виде выпадения волос трихолог-эстетист Илья Туров, который шарит за банки для волос и рассказывает о них в научпоп стиле, напомнил мне и теперь всем нам, что помимо средств от выпадения волос важ…
кто я — акне? розацеа? кератоз?
спутать их между собой очень даже легко, энивей эти признаки выдают, кто есть кто, поэтому запоминайте
что общего у всех трех состояний? (если корректно выражаться, то только гиперкератоз это состояние кожи, акне и розацеа все же хронические заболевания кожи)
мелкие красные возвышения над кожей как прыщики, неровный рельеф кожи, шероховатость, неровный тон лица — вот, что объединяет…
Эффезел все?
в последние дни этот эффективный препарат от акне стал чуть ли не самым обсуждаемым среди врачей и акнешников, а точнее он и его адепт и дженерик Акнетико Дуо, новый препарат от акне с той же комбинацией адапалена 1 мг/г + бензоила пероксид 25 мг/г
все дело в том, что в ряде стран начал истекать патент на оригинальный препарат «Эффезел», что позволило производителям выпускать первые аналоги-дженерики н…
Пептиды находятся в самом конце состава, а значит, их концентрация слишком мала и они не работают
Фраза, которая сразу выдаёт человека, не умеющего разбирать составы и не понимающего реальные концентрации пептидов в косметике.
Почему? Потому что рабочая концентрация чистого пептида редко превышает 1%.
А как же все эти 5, 10 или даже 30% пептидов на упаковке?
Бьюти-рынок приучил нас к тому, что на упаковке мы редк…
мужские до/после особенно ценны, потому что давайте вспомним, как парни не даются выдавить у них ту самую черную точку 🤭
а здесь полное доверие и соблюдение схемы ухода, потому что она не перегружена и занимает не так много времени!
промежуточное #до_после_janeyashan
завирусившейся сейчас актив уже давно был в отечественных банках, но как всегда корейцы задают тренды — так стоит ли брать хлорноватистую кислоту, которая сейчас дико популярна?
вообще хлорноватистая кислота (HOCl) вырабатывается в нашем организме в основном в лейкоцитах, включая нейтрофилы, макрофаги и моноциты, защищая организм от патогенов, умные люди и маркетологи хакнули эту систему и выпустили в массовое произ…
❤92💯9🔥9
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @janeyashan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 453,655 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@janeyashan named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@morescienceinbeauty named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“скин-talk” (@janeyashan), 15,584 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/janeyashan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
