Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net +226. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,153–2,549 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 02:37
2,431
-15
12 Sept 2026, 07:56
2,446
-18
7 Sept 2026, 18:01
2,464
-13
3 Sept 2026, 00:38
2,477
-11
31 Aug 2026, 06:17
2,488
-15
28 Aug 2026, 06:54
2,503
+3
24 Aug 2026, 23:49
2,500
+106
21 Aug 2026, 02:48
2,394
+195
17 Aug 2026, 16:58
2,199
-4
10 Aug 2026, 16:31
2,203
-2
7 Aug 2026, 14:33
2,205
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:04
2,205
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
635 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
158
24.9%
🤣
146
23.0%
👍
88
13.9%
😁
77
12.1%
🔥
36
5.67%
💔
35
5.51%
⚡
16
2.52%
💯
16
2.52%
🤓
16
2.52%
😱
11
1.73%
😎
9
1.42%
🤩
9
1.42%
😭
8
1.26%
🤔
4
0.63%
❤🔥
3
0.472%
🤨
2
0.315%
😢
1
0.157%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 635 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @krovavi_sport. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📝❌ После слёта Чарльза Оливейры кард UFC 331 стал просто отвратительным. Если противостояние Армана против Чарльза прибавляло интерес, то бой Царукяна против Руффи — полный отстой
Арману хватит 2 локтя в партере, чтобы все мечты Маурисио рухнули. И у меня нету никаких сомнений, что это произойдёт
Зато есть сомнения, что кард в таком месте соберёт полную арену и продаст много PPV. Турнир проходит в Лос-Анджелесе, на…
🇷🇸 Первый в истории UFC турнир в Белграде уже начался. У меня есть особая чуйка на победу трёх андердогов
Марк Вологдин — 2,60
Посмотрел последний бой его соперника — не увидел ничего сверхъестественного. Марк будет атаковать и как всегда работать первым номером. Допускаю, что Николич может не выдержать темп Марка и проиграть
Душко Тодорович — 2,44
Не понимаю, как Роберт Валентин может идти фаворитом против любого …
🇫🇷 В сентябре на турнире UFC Paris дебютирует Саладин Парнасс
Многие могли не слышать это имя, но он ОБЯЗАН пошуметь в лучшем промоушне мира
Начнём с того, что это второй в истории UFC случай, когда боец в дебюте возглавляет кард турнира (без учёта боёв, когда UFC погладили другие лиги и чемпионы сразу получали титульники). Первым был Джастин Гейджи
А ещё у Парнасса 4 защиты титула в лёгком весе топовой лиги KSW и…
Сегодня Магомед Анкалаев должен ПЕРЕЕХАТЬ Богдана Гуськова. При всём уважении к узбекскому бойцу, «Биг Анк» на уровень выше. Думаю, что россиянин сможет финишировать оппонента в первые 3 раунда
#UFCAbuDhabi
⛰️ Вот такая обстановка. Извините, если посты будут выходить с редкой периодичностью следующие дни. Но турнир в Абу-Даби попытаюсь отработать штабно
Кровавый Спорт - подпишись
💰 Все прогнозы зашли идеально, от и до. Если всё сделали правильно, по моим советам, то у вас уже есть ключик от новой квартиры на Дельгадо, дополнение в виде машины на Данкане решением и приятный бонус в виде победы Дю Плесси
На самом деле, Дрикус удивил. Не особо верил в него, а он прям переехал Усмана. Такого с Камару во всей карьере не делал никто. Теперь я бы свёл его с Имавовым, чтобы выявить главного претенде…
💥 На предстоящем UFC OKC меня интересует 3 поединка
Дельгадо — Баши. Для меня это второй по интересу поединок турнира после главного боя. Оба хорошие проспекты, но с поражением в UFC. Но Дельгадо проиграл ОЧЕНЬ спорным решением Натаниэлю Вуду, зато уже успел реабилитироваться против Фили. До этого у него 2 глухих КО в первом раунде. Противостояние стилей, как нам кажется, но у Дельгадо и грэпплинг на месте. Если у в…
🇧🇷 На это уже даже смотреть неприятно. Алекс Перейра до сих пор кидается камнями в Хёрба Дина, как шестилетняя девочка
С его боя прошло уже БОЛЬШЕ МЕСЯЦА (да-да, быстро летит время), а он всё не может успокоиться и приступить к работе. Даже поражение так не испортило ему репутацию, как обвинения в сторону рефери
Сегодня в запрещённой соцсети он выкатил длинный пост на двух языках, прикрепив туда грустное видео с ха…
⚽️ Если вы до сих пор думаете, что в футболе все мягкотелые симулянты, то посмотрите, что творится в 1/2 финала Чемпионата Мира. Даже Конор так не смог пробить
Кстати, лучший матч ЧМ из тех, что можно было сделать. Включайте скорее!
Кровавый Спорт - подпишись
🏥 Очень много людей пишут, что Макгрегор порвал кресты ещё до боя, а в поединке понял, что не может драться
Уже много авторов это обсудили, но хочу сказать своё мнение на примере другого спортсмена
Начнём с того, что Конор выглядел ужасно. Потеряно, без эмоций, как будто находится не в своей тарелке. И двигался он как-то неподобающе спортсмену хорошего уровня. При выходе и вправду не наступал на ногу
Я связываю эт…
😢 Интересно узнать. Что для вас более грустное и разочаровывающее событие за последнюю неделю?
🇮🇪 Поражение Конора Макгрегора за минуту69%
🇵🇹 Вылет Криштиану Роналду с последнего Чемпионата Мира31%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
💔4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @krovavi_sport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🇮🇪 Конор Макгрегор! Король вернётся, кровь прольётся44%
🇺🇸 Макс Холлоуэй. Спортивный тонус зарешает56%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Matveev | MMA & Boxing @matveevmmaboxing · 22,661 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 September 2026
MMA review @topMMAreview · 27,978 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
Ночь в клетке @cagehorrornightreal · 21,305 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 September 2026
HARDCORE MMA & BNGTV @hardcoremma · 24,220 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
KALUGIN MMA @kaluginboy · 50,501 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
BEST of MMA @mmabestof · 29,625 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
Двоечка ММА | UFC @dvoyechka · 22,402 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
Вестник MMA @vestnik_mma · 26,118 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
Captain Hardcore @caphard · 37,800 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кровавый Спорт” (@krovavi_sport), 2,431 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krovavi_sport.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.