Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ringov

Channel

Ringov

@ringov

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,315subscribers

-30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001291238146
TypeChannel
Usernames@flutterbro @ringov
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ringov

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3151,3451,3306 August 2026 — 1,345 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,345 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,345 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,345 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,344 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,344 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,342 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,342 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,340 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,339 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,336 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,336 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,335 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,335 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,333 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,333 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,328 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,327 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,327 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,326 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,324 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,323 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,319 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,316 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,316 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,315 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 43 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,311–1,350 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 18:181,315-1
17 Sept 2026, 15:211,316no change
14 Sept 2026, 15:201,316-3
13 Sept 2026, 09:591,319-4
11 Sept 2026, 09:371,323-1
9 Sept 2026, 21:361,324-2
6 Sept 2026, 11:151,326-1
4 Sept 2026, 05:571,327no change
2 Sept 2026, 11:251,327-1
31 Aug 2026, 17:551,328-5
30 Aug 2026, 17:491,333no change
28 Aug 2026, 18:561,333-2
25 Aug 2026, 19:321,335no change
24 Aug 2026, 03:231,335-1
20 Aug 2026, 21:181,336no change
19 Aug 2026, 17:561,336-3
17 Aug 2026, 13:031,339-1
16 Aug 2026, 20:471,340-2
14 Aug 2026, 09:491,342no change
13 Aug 2026, 17:541,342first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 10 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

788 reactions across 18 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54408265386374344748911.3%
🔥8410.7%
❤719.01%
💩526.60%
custom 6293919223873800155516.47%
custom 5368635272332352173496.22%
😁445.58%
👍344.31%
custom 5204448658405225280334.19%
custom 5235818786002575337334.19%
💊232.92%
custom 5233376328295661346212.66%
custom 5197248832928227386182.28%
custom 5368808376694248152162.03%
❤‍🔥162.03%
custom 5382353531019746592141.78%
custom 6325557756862400290111.40%
🗿101.27%
custom 523578592950276118691.14%
custom 523593020604416735791.14%
23 further kinds10112.8%

Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 788 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ringov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 April 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC523 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Потихоньку начинаем с командой делиться наружу, а что же мы такого вообще делаем — через неделю будем на Agentic AI Dev Meetup рассказывать про наш продукт для команды закупок. Ещё там будут доклады про организацию агентского цикла, голосовых агентов, агентские платформы — короче аджентик инжиниринг всякий. 11 августа в 19:00, бесплатно, но количество мест ограничено, так что с регистрацией не затягивайте 🤩

custom 523337632829566134610🔥6👍4💩1😁1

31 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC638 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Там ещё был вот такой слайд, что "контекст — это новая документация, но только описывателей контекста как не было, так и нет". Эх, а представьте, если бы были специально обученные люди, у которых профессия такая — качественно собирать и предоставлять весь необходимый контекст? А что, если я вам скажу, что ОНИ СУЩЕСТВУЮТ?! Это же простые советские технические писатели! И так уж совпало, что моя любимая жена Катя уж…

custom 52357859295027611869custom 60374611345822224485❤4💩3custom 52446832634940698803custom 53190345160969513913💊1😁1

27 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC984 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Последнее время надропалось куча материалов про AI трансформацию в компаниях: • концепция от Сбера • исследование от Microsoft • преза от каких-то ноунеймов Faust Consulting. Конечно же читать вы это не будете, поэтому лучше послушайте нейрорэп — примерно так выглядит каждый мой рабочий день 💃 Ирония иронией, но вообще-то все три доки годные. Это буквально отражение реальной ситуации в компаниях — по крайней мере …

custom 632555775686240029011custom 52359302060441673579👍5💩3💊2

17 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC≈1,270 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Разница между опросами полгода 📈

custom 629391922387380015541🫡5🗿4💩3🎉1

13 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC≈4,370 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какой процент кода за вас уже пишут AI агенты? Табы не в счёт.

  1. <10% — незначительный19%
  2. 10-40% — меньше половины13%
  3. 40-60% — около половины15%
  4. 60-90% — больше половины22%
  5. >90% — почти всё31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 536863527233235217323🌚5💩5💊3❤1

13 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,360 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот такая напоминалка недавно прилетела от себя из прошлого. Тогда спорили, нужно ли в репозитории как-то размечать код, написанный агентами, и зачем это вообще может быть нужно. Но спор свелся к тейку про то, что через год и так весь код будет писать агент, и тогда зачем это трекать. Собственно, давайте проверим, насколько Илюха хороший оракул. Ща закину опрос: отвечайте, шерьте, давайте соберем плотную статистику…

custom 536863527233235217319😁6👨‍💻2💩2💊1

14 Jun 2026, 08:43 UTC≈1,760 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Прецедент с Fable, кстати, отличный повод напомнить про вендор-агностицизм: 1. Все вендоры используют свои папочки .claude/.codex/.cursor и т.д. Первый шаг агностика — сделать в репе папку .agents, а все специфичные убрать в .gitignore. 2. Потом просим агента написать скрипт .agents/setup, который будет зеркалировать содержимое .agents уже в вендорские папки. Кто-то это делает симлинками, мне больше нравится прям к…

custom 536880837669424815216👍9🔥4custom 53665846015421693934💯3❤1💩1

13 Jun 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,280 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Продрал, значит, ночью глаза, захожу с телефона через remote-control проверить, что клодушка там пыхтит-старается, никаких у него блокеров не возникает — а там "кажется у вас нет модели fable". Я репу почесал, ну, думаю, наверное флакнуло чота, говорю "продолжай ультракодить" — и пошел дальше спать. А утром выясняется, что мифус ака фейбл забанили, а значит ночные лимиты не израсходованы 😢

custom 519724883292822738618custom 53686352723323521737custom 57760641034831843367😁5💩2

9 Jun 2026, 07:24 UTC≈1,610 views27 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Спросили недавно, кого я читаю в телеграме, чтобы быть в AI темке. У меня про это пара сотен подписок наберётся, но большинство лежит просто мёртвым грузом, такое советовать не хочется. Поэтому отобрал самый топовый топ из 10 каналов, чьи посты я читаю в 100% случаев. Но оговорочка — подборка разношёрстная. Базовая база, эти двое по умолчанию без объяснений: 1. @denissexy 2. @seeallochnaya 3. За эйай новостями: @…

🔥13custom 52358187860025753376❤‍🔥3custom 54408265386374344743💩2

7 Jun 2026, 08:41 UTC≈1,330 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня весь день на нашей первой летней конференции Yandex Mobile Runtime! Буду вести трек 🧠, а параллельно будет трек "not so 🧠" Начинаем через 20 минут, залетайте смотреть трансляцию!

🔥14custom 52266397451063305514😱3🫡2❤1💩1🗿1

31 May 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,750 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мы прямо сейчас на CodeFest в Новосибирске, и тут все обсуждают ИИ-агентов. И мы подумали, что параллельно должен ещё проходить КожФест — конференция, где ИИ-агенты обсуждают кожаных. Подумано — сделано, велком на КожФест! Там весь день собственная программа, кофебрейк, курилка, можно тратить токены на агентов, упираться в лимиты, но потом они сбрасываются... короче всё как мы любим. Голосуйте за своих фаворитов ☀…

custom 520444865840522528033😁12🔥5custom 52692250759906265145custom 52696342317551137355custom 52692892771617694753custom 52696798271279246643💩2

27 May 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,930 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В продолжении поста про Software Development, видос с прошедшего Google I/O, про ещё более фундаментальные сдвиги на почве AI. Видео, кстати, ощущается как глоток свежего воздуха в бесконечном потоке агентов/скиллов/харнессов и т.д. В том числе отвечает на вопрос, чем разработчики будут заниматься в ближайшие годы и почему этот ваш хвалёный вайбкодинг не заменит нас.

🔥10✍5❤3👀2👍2💊1💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ringov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTCAnonymous Poll1,410 voters approx.

Какой процент кода за вас уже пишут AI агенты? Табы не в счёт.

  1. <10% — незначительный19%
  2. 10-40% — меньше половины13%
  3. 40-60% — около половины15%
  4. 60-90% — больше половины22%
  5. >90% — почти всё31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Flutter Heroes
@flutterDev · 22,422
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ringov” (@ringov), 1,315 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ringov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.