Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

АйТи мой хороший | про управление, опыт и Rock & Roll

@itmhor

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,520subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001867380392
TypeChannel
Username@itmhor
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/itmhor

Growth

1,5101,5201,5156 August 2026 — 1,510 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,514 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,517 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,520 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,509–1,522 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:441,520+3
10 Aug 2026, 17:061,517+3
7 Aug 2026, 13:101,514+4
6 Aug 2026, 20:471,510first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.2%
avg views ÷ 1,520 subscribers
Avg views / post
261
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (28 January 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,304
Reactions total46
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

232 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7130.6%
👍7030.2%
4419.0%
😁2912.5%
👏73.02%
💯62.59%
👀31.29%
❤‍🔥20.862%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 232reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC137 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😲 Маркетинг или реальный прогресс? Наш канал добавили в папку каналов про ИИ, IT, digital и технологии. Для тех, кто привык проверять источники (а не верить каждому хайповому треду на 100500 репостов 🫠) Там пишут: • где реально происходит технологический прорыв, а где просто очень хороший маркетинг • какие инструменты и тренды стоит держать на радаре уже сейчас • как расти в профессии, когда рынок опять «немного шт

2👍1🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC281 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Как вам такой вайбкодинг?

😁5👀31👏1🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 05:34 UTC306 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📖 Корпоративные басни #1 Производственный подкаст 🦁 Собрал однажды Лев совет: - Нам нужен план на много лет! 🦜 Попугай вскочил тотчас: - Давайте всё уложим… в час! Но, чтобы встречу нам собрать, Сперва решим, с чего начать. 🐒 Обезьяна - хлоп в ладоши: - Подход, мне кажется, хороший! Сначала обсудим регламент встреч, Потом научимся время беречь. 🦊 Лиса сказала: - Не спешите. Ещё повестку согласуйте. Потом соб

👍31👏1💯1

29 Jul 2026, 16:32 UTC277 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хотите узнать, как за неделю потерять доверие команды? Начните менять всё сразу. Я видел это десятки раз. Приходит новый CIO, CTO или руководитель направления. И буквально через неделю начинает: 1️⃣ менять оргструктуру; 2️⃣ увольнять людей; 3️⃣ запускать новую стратегию; 4️⃣ перестраивать процессы; 5️⃣ менять инструменты; 6️⃣ рисовать красивое будущее в PowerPoint. Кажется, именно так и должен выглядеть сильный

👍10🔥41

28 Jul 2026, 05:31 UTC303 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вчера у тебя было 300 человек в подчинении. Сегодня - 70. Это совсем не обязательно шаг назад. Я всё чаще замечаю, что многих руководителей пугают изменения. Особенно когда меняется размер команды. Кажется, будто чем больше людей, тем выше твоя ценность. Но представляешь, мир уже изменился. AI забирает рутину. Автоматизация заменяет процессы. Команды становятся компактнее. Решения принимаются быстрее. Если вчера

👍5🔥32

10 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC469 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А теперь к важным новостям! Мои дружочки из безэтоговотвсего делают прекраснейшее событие - #летобезвотэтоговотвсего. Это не конференция и не воркшоп. Это день настоящего летнего отдыха в компании классных людей. Причем можно смело приезжать всей семьей. Я езжу к ребятам каждый год и могу с уверенностью сказать: это лучшее мероприятие, на котором мне доводилось бывать. Всё по-домашнему, очень душевно, без лишнего п

6👍4🔥3

9 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC398 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gdenebomusicPhoto

27 июля для нас особенный день. В этот день выходит наш новый альбом «Карма». И в этот же день у нас с Димой день рождения. Если вы давно хотели сделать для нас что-то действительно важное — лучшего подарка просто не придумать. Сделайте пресейв альбома. Это бесплатно, занимает меньше минуты, но именно пресейвы помогают музыке попасть к большему количеству людей в день релиза. Спасибо каждому, кто поддерживает нас

12🔥5👍2

2 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC508 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

344 реальных инцидента. AI уже ломает прод — и это не случайность. 🤖💥 Ну что, у кого агент уже добрался до продакшна? Да, история уже не новая. Но выводы из неё становятся только актуальнее. В апреле AI-агент на Claude Opus снёс production-базу вместе с бэкапами у стартапа PocketOS. Почти одновременно инженер из DataTalks.Club, работая с Claude Code и Terraform, случайно удалил прод-инфраструктуру с данными за 2,5

🔥32👍1

30 Jun 2026, 05:48 UTC389 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

AI / LLM и агенты Мы все видим, что происходит с топливом в России: люди массово скупают бензин и пытаются залить его в любые ёмкости. Прямо как когда-то с гречкой - та же паника и суета. А теперь посмотрим, что происходит с ИИ. $206 млрд на ИИ-агентов. Вопрос уже не «зачем», а «что запускать первым». Цифра дня: по прогнозу Gartner, рынок ПО с ИИ-агентами в 2026 году вырастет до $206 млрд. Это +139% всего за год.

👍4🔥31

29 Jun 2026, 05:22 UTC416 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новая модель каждые два дня - и почему это ловушка 🤒 Уверен, многие из вас используют ИИ уже не только в повседневной жизни, но и в работе. И тут возникает важный вопрос: как часто нужно обновлять модели и гнаться за новыми релизами? Кажется, что чуть ли не каждые два дня выходит очередная модель. И тут начинается любимое: прибегает кто-нибудь с горящими глазами и говорит: - Вышла новая модель! Давайте срочно пере

💯4👍3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @itmhor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 559,227 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АйТи мой хороший | про управление, опыт и Rock & Roll” (@itmhor), 1,520 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itmhor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.