Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [ کانال برهان ]

Channel

[ کانال برهان ]

@borrhan

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,956subscribers

+182 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001006960078
TypeChannel
Username@borrhan
Created27 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/borrhan

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “کانال برهان” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

11,77311,95611,864.55 August 2026 — 11,774 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,774 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,773 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,777 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,778 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,781 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,789 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,807 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,808 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,804 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,805 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,808 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,814 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,824 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,830 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,834 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,832 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,844 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,850 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,849 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,846 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,849 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,851 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,858 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,863 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,871 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,874 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,876 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,921 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,956 subscribers5 August 202618 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 44 days, net +182. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,746–11,983 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:3711,956+35
16 Sept 2026, 03:1511,921+45
14 Sept 2026, 08:1811,876+2
12 Sept 2026, 13:5711,874+3
10 Sept 2026, 14:5711,871+8
7 Sept 2026, 11:1711,863+5
4 Sept 2026, 15:5811,858+7
1 Sept 2026, 23:0711,851+2
31 Aug 2026, 20:0811,849+3
30 Aug 2026, 23:1811,846-3
30 Aug 2026, 02:0311,849-1
29 Aug 2026, 04:2411,850+6
28 Aug 2026, 02:4611,844+12
27 Aug 2026, 02:0111,832-2
26 Aug 2026, 02:3611,834+4
25 Aug 2026, 00:3311,830+6
23 Aug 2026, 11:4511,824+10
22 Aug 2026, 00:4911,814+6
20 Aug 2026, 19:2311,808+3
19 Aug 2026, 18:2611,805first reading

Engagement

180 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.79%
avg views ÷ 11,956 subscribers
Avg views / post
453
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 180 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held180 (4 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total8,614
Reactions total82
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 16m
Average length
4m 02s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

777 reactions across 135 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤35045.0%
👍21027.0%
😭658.37%
🔥455.79%
👏395.02%
🤬253.22%
💔232.96%
😢81.03%
😁60.772%
😱30.386%
🥴20.257%
👎10.129%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 141 of the 180 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 806 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 180 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:35 UTC514 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

⚠️باز هم دستبرد در منابع و این بار تحریف صلوات در متون شیعی ! توضیحات↓↓ https://t.me/borrhan/65432

👍3🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 13:34 UTC340 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

#صلوات (۹۹) #تحریف (۳۷۱) ⚠️حداقل متون شیعی را تحریف نکنید! ┄┄┅═✧❁﷽❁✧═┅┄┄ کتاب صمدیه اثر مرحوم شیخ بهایی رضوان‌الله‌علیه(۱۰۳۰ هــ) از کتب موجزه و مختصر در علم نحو است که شروح متعددی بر آن نگاشته شده و حتّی به جهت حُسن ترتیب، حجم کم و فوائد فراوان، در میان طلّاب برخی مناطق عامّه نیز تدریس می‌شود¹. عبد الکریم محمد المدرّس(۱۴۲۶ هـ) یکی از علمای عامّه کُرد است که شرحی مَزجی بر صمدیّه نگاشته است. 🔻مرحوم شیخ بهایی در خط…

👍3

2 Sept 2026, 08:32 UTC379 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🔸به مناسبت ایام ولادت خاتم الانبیاء صلی‌اللّه علیه وآله فایل pdf دو کتاب در موضوع قرائت حضرت امیر علیه‌السّلام از سیرهٔ رسول خدا صلی‌اللّه علیه وآله با استناد به نهج‌البلاغة در «کتابخانه برهان» بارگذاری شد↓↓ ۱- السیرة النبویة فی رؤیة أمیرالمؤمنین علیه‌السّلام/دراسة في نهج‌البلاغة/عدنان عبدالواحد العواد ۲- النبوّة في نهج البلاغة, قراءة علوية للسيرة المحمدية/دكتر أحمد راسم النفيس →https://t.me/borrhanlibrary/13886 →ht…

❤5

2 Sept 2026, 08:06 UTC368 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🔸امیرالمؤمنین علیه‌السّلام و خون‌خواهی هُرمُزان/قسمت پنجم توضیحات↓↓ https://t.me/borrhan/65426

❤4👍1

2 Sept 2026, 08:05 UTC358 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026

‍ ‍‍‍‍ #ابولؤلؤ #اسلام_و_ایرانیان #فرحة_الزهراء #صفین #معجزات_الائمه #حکومت_علوی #تبعیض_نژادی #معاویه #عمروعاص #عدالت_صحابه #مالک_اشتر #قتل_عثمان ✅ امیرالمؤمنین علیه السلام و خون‌خواهی هرمزان #قسمت_پنجم ❥༻⃘⃕࿇﷽༻⃘⃕❀༅⊹━┅┄ قال عوانة: فحدثني يزيد بن جرير، عن الشعبي، عن شقيق بن مسلمة... قال: و أكثر الناس في أمر الهرمزان و عبيد الله بن عمر، و قتله إياه، و بلغ ما قال فيه علي بن أبي طالب، فقام عثمان فصعد المنبر، فحمد الله و …

❤5👍3

1 Sept 2026, 15:29 UTC543 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

✅ ذکر رسول‌اللّه و اهل‌بیت علیهم‌السّلام در نماز از جابر جعفی روایت شده که گفت: از امام صادق صلوات اللّه علیه شنیدم که می‌فرمودند : هرگاه یکی از شما نماز بخواند و فراموش کند که در نمازش محمد و آل محمد (علیهم‌السلام) را یاد کند ، نمازش به راهی غیر از راه بهشت می‌رود (یعنی از مسیر قبولی خارج می‌شود) و هیچ نمازی پذیرفته نمی‌شود مگر آنکه در آن محمد و آل محمد یاد شده باشند. 🔸 عَنْ جَابِرٍ الْجُعْفِيِ‏ قَالَ سَمِعْتُ أَبَ…

❤9👍2

1 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC512 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🔸فایل pdf مقاله جذاب نقش حجج الهی در پیشرفت و بهبود زندگی دنیوی بشر در «کتابخانه برهان» بارگذاری شد↓ https://t.me/borrhanlibrary/13883 چکیده: در جامعه امروز این تفکر شایع شده که ادیان و حجت‌های الهی کاری به زندگی دنیوی بشر نداشته، فقط مردم را به اخروی دعوت کرده‌اند. در همین راستا این شبهه مطرح می‌شود که دین برای امور دنیوی مردم ناقص است. ادعا این است که حجج الهی نه‌ تنها در مسائل اخروی، بلکه در امور دنیوی نیز محل رج…

❤5

1 Sept 2026, 08:11 UTC468 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🔸 امیرالمؤمنین علیه‌السّلام و خون‌خواهی هُرمُزان/قسمت چهارم توضیحات↓↓ https://t.me/borrhan/65419

❤3👍1

1 Sept 2026, 08:09 UTC521 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

‍ ‍‍‍ #ابولؤلؤ #اسلام_و_ایرانیان #فرحة_الزهراء #صفین #معجزات_الائمه #حکومت_علوی #تبعیض_نژادی #معاویه #عمروعاص #عدالت_صحابه #مالک_اشتر #قتل_عثمان ✅ امیرالمؤمنین علیه السلام و خون‌خواهی هرمزان #قسمت_چهارم ❥༻⃘⃕࿇﷽༻⃘⃕❀༅⊹━┅┄ وأما «عبيد الله بن عمر بن الخطاب» ، فكان شديد البطش. فلما قتل «عمر» جرّد سيفه فقتل بنت «أبى لؤلؤة» ، وقتل «الهرمزان» ، و «جفينة» - رجلا أعجميّا- وقال: لا أدع أعجميّا إلا قتلته. فأراد «عليّ» قتله بمن…

👍3

31 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC546 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

💎به مناسبت ایام ولادت ختمی مرتبت حضرت محمدمصطفی صلی‌الله علیه وآله یک جلسه سخنرانی با عنوان «رمزگشایی از نام محمد» ایراد شده توسط آقای هادی تقوی در «برهان مدیا» بارگذاری شد↓↓ https://t.me/borrhanmedia/3871 خلاصه‌ای از آنچه که می‌شنوید: آیا نام «محمد» پیش از ظهور اسلام سابقه داشته یا عنوانی است که پس از آن رواج یافته است؟ این سخنرانی با تکیه بر شواهدی از سکه‌ها، کتیبه‌های جنوب عربستان (یمن) و پاپیروس‌های کهن دوزبانه،…

❤9

Showing the 12 most recent of 180 posts we hold for @borrhan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@borrhan edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTCAnonymous Quiz94 voters

سید مرتضی رحمه الله نقل کرده که: بزرگان آل ابیطالب ..... را از پدرانشان روایت می‌کردند و به فرزندانشان می‌آموختند.

  1. حدیث غدیر22%
  2. حدیث ثقلین5%
  3. #خطبه_فدکیه65%
  4. حدیث منزلت7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 180 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

° آرشیو برهان °
@borrhan2 · 1,245
16 posts
تقویم شیعه 🏴
@taqvim_shia · 13,219
7 posts
🕐ږۅشَݩگَــږۍ🕐
@roushangari110 · 259
6 posts
فریادرس
@fariadras · 470
3 posts
ظهور دروغين
@zohour5 · 1,475
3 posts
درس های معارفی امامت
@darshayeemamat · 302
2 posts
علماء_مراجع_تقلید_اجتهاد
@ejtehad_taghlid · 102
2 posts
قاموس قرآن
@ghamoos_quran · 66
2 posts
شیخ عباس فتحیه
@Abbas_fathiieh · 717
1 post
[ The Proof ]
@al_Burhan_English · 169
1 post
دینکلاس
@dinclass · 2,113
1 post
منتظران ظهور امام عصر (عجل الله)
@emam12asraj · 2,365
1 post
کانال تاريخ مسلمين و مطالب اعتقادى
@eteghadattarikhmoslemin · 2,804
1 post
فاروق اعظم امیرالمومنین ع است
@farooqir · 336
1 post
لینک کانالهاوگروه های مذهبی
@linkdoonitalla · 214
1 post
یادنامه مرحوم آقای سید احمد شاه موسوی
@s_ahmad_shah · 348
1 post
یا صاحب الزمان ادرکنی
@sahebazaman_bomehen · 4
1 post
طلسم فال بخت گشا سر کتاب زبان بند پیشگویی سحر و جادو دعانویسی
@sehrtelesmfal · 378
1 post
مناقب و مصائب امیرالمومنین علیه السلام
@shahe_najaf133 · 69
1 post
Shalchian14
@shalchian14 · 763
1 post
اختصاصی بودن تفسیر قرآن کریم " نَحْنُ الرَّاسِخُونَ فِي الْعِلْمِ وَ نَحْنُ نَعْلَمُ تَأْوِيلَهُ "
@tafcir110 · 145
1 post
بررسی حدیث ضعیف موسوم به وصیت
@vassiyat · 125
1 post
هزاره جنبش یتیمان مزاری(ره)
@YatemanMazary · 325
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

حکیمِ طبِ سُنتی اسلامی
@hakimkhirandish · 23,141
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 September 2026
التجا
@elteja · 30,472
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 7 September 2026
بنیاد شهید مطهری
@motahari_ir · 20,443
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 September 2026
شیعه پژوهی
@negahiinou · 12,911
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[ کانال برهان ]” (@borrhan), 11,956 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/borrhan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.