Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
° آرشیو برهان °
@borrhan2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,216subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001165532788 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @borrhan2 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/borrhan2 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 1,216 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 1,215 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 1,210 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 1,209 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.1%
- avg views ÷ 1,216 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 136
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 October 2025 – 17 July 2026) |
| Views total | 542 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
نگاهی به ماجرای صفین و نقد یکی از عبارات حماسه حسینی https://t.me/borrhan/64863 خبر غیبی جناب عمار از رسول خدا صلیالله علیه و آله درباره جنگ صفین https://t.me/borrhan/64142 پاسخ به شبهات سلیمانی اردستانی با نگاهی به ماجرای صفین https://t.me/borrhan/63811 خبر غیبی رسولاللّه از بروز کینهها بر علیه امیرالمؤمنین علیهالسّلام https://t.me/borrhan/63760 علامت نفاق صحابه و اثبات کفر اهل صفین https://t.me/borrhan/6352…
ملاقات أمیر المومنین با راهب مسیحی در مسیر صفین https://t.me/borrhan/49460?single معاویه و پروژه قتل اصحاب و قتل عمار یاسر https://t.me/borrhan/49466 کلام امیرالمؤمنین درباره معاویه در صفین : معاویه اهل دین و قرآن نیست! https://t.me/borrhan/49467 سقوط مرگبار نظریه عدالت صحابه با توجه به وقایع جنگ صفین https://t.me/borrhan/49493 https://t.me/borrhan/56060 https://t.me/borrhan/56061 https://t.me/borrhan/59510 عمروع…
✅ جنگ #صفین شمر جانباز جنگ صفین بود؟ https://t.me/borrhan/36254 https://t.me/borrhan/43377 اشعث بن قیس در صفین و بیوگرافی کوتاه از او https://t.me/borrhan/41836 احتجاج امیرالمومنین به حدیثغدیر در صفین https://t.me/borrhan/35770 قرآن ناطق و جنگ برای تاویل قرآن و جهنمی بودن اهل صفین https://t.me/borrhan/29693 https://t.me/borrhan/22284 پیشگویی رسول خدا از بروز اتفاق مشابهی مانند آنچه که در صلح حدیبیه افتاد در صفی…
Sticker, posted without a caption
مفاخره امیرالمومنین علیه السلام با معاویه https://t.me/borrhan/60888 مقایسه سیره مخالفین در تنزیه معاویه در مشی با شیعیان https://t.me/borrhan/60867?single نسب معاویه مادر معاویه صاحب پرچم!! https://t.me/borrhan/60863?single معافیت بازماندگان مشرکین قریش در کلام عمار یاسر https://t.me/borrhan/64140 عذاب معاویه در قیامت ذیل تفسیر یکی از آیات قرآن https://t.me/borrhan/64141 «8»
طعام معاویه! https://t.me/borrhan/64133 پاسخ به شبهات اردستانی و نگاهی به مظالم معاویه https://t.me/borrhan/63811 عایشه و فروش خانه خود در زمان معاویه https://t.me/borrhan/63770?single استنتاج منطقی و اثبات کفر معاویه https://t.me/borrhan/63525 احادیث جعلی زمان معاویه به اعتراف یکی از ناقدین صحیح بخاری https://t.me/borrhan/63337 آیهای که امام مجتبی علیه السلام در هنگام صلح با معاویه ایراد فرمودند https://t.me/…
✅ ١٢ رجب سالمرگ معاویه ✅ حتما #اسکنهای ذیل مطالب را هم مطالعه فرمایید. - در روز ۱۲ رجب چه اتفاقی افتاد؟ https://t.me/borrhan/23848 -بررسی نامه امیرالمومنین(نامه ۶ نهجالبلاغه) به #معاویه و پاسخ به شبهه خلافت شورایی: https://t.me/borrhan/31332 -مرگ #معاویه بر دین غیر از اسلام https://t.me/borrhan/31187 -روشنگری معاویه بن یزید بن معاویه، نوه معاویه، درباره #معاویه https://t.me/borrhan/31186 https://t.me/borrhan/…
- اعتراف علمای مخالفین : تمام مشکلات اسلام از #معاویه است. https://t.me/borrhan/12109 - اعتراف ابن تیمیه: هیچ فضیلت با سند صحیح درباره #معاویه نداریم! https://t.me/borrhan/23874 https://t.me/borrhan/23875 https://t.me/borrhan/10180 - جایگاه #معاویه در دوزخ: https://t.me/borrhan/10145 - دستور رسول خدا صلی الله علیه و آله بر گردن زدن #معاویه : https://t.me/borrhan/23858 - اعتراف علمای مخالفین در این که هیچ فضیلت صح…
- اعتراف به حدیث غدیر در مقابل معاویه از زبان سعد ابن ابی وقاص ، در منابع مخالفین. https://t.me/borrhan/34441 - طعنه فخر رازی به دودمان بنی امیه و انقراض آنان و برکت نسل اهل بیت علیهم السلام با وجود نسل کشی ها. https://t.me/borrhan/35106 - پیشگویی رسول خدا صلی الله علیه و آله از جسارت معاویه به امیرالمومنین در جنگ صفین به اعتراف مخالفین . https://t.me/borrhan/35165 - حضور معاویه در واقعه غدیر و عکس العمل او به اعت…
خواستگاری معاویه از امامه مادر محمد حنفیه پس از شهادت امیرالمومنین علیه السلام و جواب رد ایشان https://t.me/borrhan/50584 مروان حکم ،داماد عثمان و نقش او در قتل عثمان https://t.me/borrhan/50550 اندر عجایت مکتب سقیفه: طلحه و زبیر و معاویه در بهشت و خلیفه چهارم در جهنم!! https://t.me/borrhan/50421 معاویه و قتل حجر بن عدی و پاسخ به شبهه پراکنی وهابیت درباره یک سند صحیح شهادت حضرت زهرا سلام الله علیها https://t.me/bor…
عاقبت نسائی ، صاحب یکی از صحاح سته به جرم عدم نقل فضیلتی برای معاویه https://t.me/borrhan/31133 https://t.me/borrhan/23854 https://t.me/borrhan/51041?single https://t.me/borrhan/59415 حدیث غدیر بر اساس اصول مخالفین و عملکرد معاویه https://t.me/borrhan/52238 نحوه تعامل امیرالمؤمنین علیهالسلام در جنگ های خود با امثال معاویه https://t.me/borrhan/52076 آیا فتوحاتی که منجر به خلافت شخصی چون معاویه شد به نفع اسلام بود؟…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @borrhan2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 3,658 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“° آرشیو برهان °” (@borrhan2), 1,216 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/borrhan2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.