Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for حکیمِ طبِ سُنتی اسلامی

Channel

حکیمِ طبِ سُنتی اسلامی

@hakimkhirandish

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,199subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001066306514
TypeChannel
Username@hakimkhirandish
Descriptionکانال غیررسمی و مربوط به مطالب مهم، نسخه ها، اطلاعیه ها و... اساتید و حکمای طراز اول کشور میباشد.
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hakimkhirandish

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 5 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ostadziayiteb/682124 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC@hakimkhirandish/9937 · this entry24 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC1.00under a minute
@ostadziayiteb/682226 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC@hakimkhirandish/9938 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@ostadziayiteb/683331 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC@hakimkhirandish/9950 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@hakimkhirandish/9937 · this entry24 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC@partosabzehasti/1140324 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC1.00under a minute
@hakimkhirandish/9938 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC@partosabzehasti/1140426 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@hakimkhirandish/9950 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC@partosabzehasti/1140831 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ostadziayiteb6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minuteeven
@partosabzehasti6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (42)
@hakimravazade5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@hakimravazade (50)
@noskhesonati5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (32)
@marjaetakhasositeb5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (41)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @hakimravazade. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

23,19923,23323,2165 August 2026 — 23,233 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,233 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,231 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,224 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,225 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,219 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,217 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,213 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,211 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,203 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,199 subscribers5 August 202614 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,194–23,238 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:5623,199-4
13 Aug 2026, 13:4723,203-8
12 Aug 2026, 15:1423,211-2
11 Aug 2026, 15:4323,213-4
10 Aug 2026, 13:4123,217-2
9 Aug 2026, 15:1623,219-6
8 Aug 2026, 17:4623,225+1
7 Aug 2026, 16:5123,224-7
6 Aug 2026, 14:2123,231-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:0323,233no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:1923,233first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.95%
avg views ÷ 23,199 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,840
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
36
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held36 (24 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total66,391
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
754
Videos
5,860
Links
624

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 25m
Average length
2m 41s

Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC700 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

👈 از کجا بفهمیم سودا و سردی بر ما غلبه کرده؟ 👈 نشانه افراد سرد مزاج چیست؟ 🌐پروفسور خیراندیش منتظر کلیپ های بعدی ما باشید👇 💠 @hakimkhirandish 📚👈جهت حمایت از کانال استاد مطالب را با لینک منتشرکنید

15 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC694 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

🔴 بهترین #زداینده های #سموم از بدن حکیم.حسین.خیراندیش #راهبرد #هوا منتظر کلیپ های بعدی ما باشید👇 💠 @hakimkhirandish 📚👈جهت حمایت از کانال استاد مطالب را با لینک منتشرکنید

15 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC637 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

✅ درمان حمله اضطراب (پانیک) و استرس مداوم با طب سنتی پاسخ: حکیم حسین خیراندیش منتظر کلیپ های بعدی ما باشید👇 💠 @hakimkhirandish 📚👈جهت حمایت از کانال استاد مطالب را با لینک منتشرکنید

14 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

🔴 درمان دیابت بارداری ❇️ مصرف عرق #گزنه و عرق #شنبلیله شبی یک استکان میتواند در درمان کمک کننده باشد و برای سازگار شدن با بدن مقدارش را در طول هفته کاهش و افزایش بدهند. 🎙حکیم حسین خیراندیش منتظر کلیپ های بعدی ما باشید👇 💠 @hakimkhirandish 📚👈جهت حمایت از کانال استاد مطالب را با لینک منتشرکنید

13 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

🔴 فاکتورهای غذایی ❇️ غذا باید متناسب #با سن، #جسم، فصل و حال افراد باشد. 🎙حکیم_حسین_خیراندیش منتظر کلیپ های بعدی ما باشید👇 💠 @hakimkhirandish 📚👈جهت حمایت از کانال استاد مطالب را با لینک منتشرکنید

12 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈1,400 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

🔴 فاکتورهای غذایی ❇️ غذا باید متناسب #با سن، #جسم، فصل و حال افراد باشد. 🎙حکیم_حسین_خیراندیش منتظر کلیپ های بعدی ما باشید👇 💠 @hakimkhirandish 📚👈جهت حمایت از کانال استاد مطالب را با لینک منتشرکنید

11 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

🔴 توانایی طب سنتی در #درمان بیماری‌ها ❇️ آیا #رفتارهای_طبی، قابل برگردان به زبان علمی است؟ بله، ولی با استفاده از قالب مخصوص خودش، چرا که در طب سنتی، باید #مزاج‌ها را در نظر گرفت و هر مزاجی را به طور مجزا مورد بررسی قرار داد، نه اینکه همه افراد را، صرف نظر از مزاجشان، با هم مقایسه کرد. چون مزاج غالب هر کشوری متفاوت است، نتایج متفاوت خواهد بود. 🎙حکیم_حسین_خیراندیش منتظر کلیپ های بعدی ما باشید👇 💠 @hakimkhirand

10 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

✅ #درمان شیرین فشار خون پایین در طب سنتی پاسخ استاد حسین خیراندیش 👌👌 منتظر کلیپ های بعدی ما باشید👇 💠 @hakimkhirandish 📚👈جهت حمایت از کانال استاد مطالب را با لینک منتشرکنید

10 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,580 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

فیلم📽 🔴 نقش سرکه در درمان #چربی و #فشار_خون حکیم.حسین.خیراندیش منتظر کلیپ های بعدی ما باشید👇 💠 @hakimkhirandish 📚👈جهت حمایت از کانال استاد مطالب را با لینک منتشرکنید

10 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @A_ostadtaleghaniVideo

🌹 انتشار برای اولین بار از کانال ایتای علامه دهر؛ علامه حسن‌زاده آملی رفع الله درجاته از نگاه حکیم حسین خیراندیش تاریخ مصاحبه: زمستان ۱۳۹۹ ┄┅═══❉💠❉═══┅┄ پ.ن: ببینید یک عالم حقیقی با القای حقایق بر جان یک فرد مستعد چه تاثیر شگرفی در یک جامعه ایجاد می کند!! در حقیقت اینهمه برکات در حیطه طب سنتی اسلامی از این حرکت ایشان شروع شد که اکنون طب سنتی در سراسر کشور تا این حد فراگیر گردیده و در عرصه سلامت جسم

9 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

🔴 توصیف انواع مزاج ❇️ لازمه درمان، #شناخت_مزاج می‌باشد و بعد به تناسب مزاج، غذا یا دارو را تجویز می‌کنیم. 🎙 حکیم_حسین_خیراندیش منتظر کلیپ های بعدی ما باشید👇 💠 @hakimkhirandish 📚👈جهت حمایت از کانال استاد مطالب را با لینک منتشرکنید

9 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

گفتگوی جنجالی #حجت_الاسلام_راجی با یک روحانی در پیاده‌روی #اربعین ⁉️ جمهوری اسلامی طاغوته!! نباید انقلاب و قیام بر علیه شاه صورت می‌گرفت!! ⁉️ مردم زمان شاه، دین‌دارتر بودن!! جواب ایشون که در پیاده اربعین بوده شنیدنیه 👆 رسانه خبری فتح 👇 eitaa.com/rsanekhabarifath 💥نشر دهید.

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @hakimkhirandish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 413,192 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

دفتر آیت الله تبریزیان
@DaftareAyatollahTabrizian · 151,625
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
🎸ترانه های قدیمی🎸
@tanehayeghadimi · 217,701
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“حکیمِ طبِ سُنتی اسلامی” (@hakimkhirandish), 23,199 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hakimkhirandish.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.