Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Аня читает

Channel

Аня читает

@book_movie_guide

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,558subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001377951051
TypeChannel
Username@book_movie_guide
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/book_movie_guide

Growth

19,54819,61119,579.57 August 2026 — 19,552 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,548 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,552 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,611 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,601 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,593 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,588 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,580 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,571 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,564 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,558 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,552 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,549 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,591 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,605 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,598 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,602 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,605 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,601 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,596 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,593 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,589 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,586 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,580 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,575 subscribers4 September 2026 — 19,568 subscribers6 September 2026 — 19,558 subscribers19,5587 August 20266 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 31 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,539–19,620 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 22:1519,558-10
4 Sept 2026, 12:0219,568-7
3 Sept 2026, 01:0719,575-5
1 Sept 2026, 20:2619,580-6
31 Aug 2026, 23:1719,586-3
30 Aug 2026, 23:5319,589-4
30 Aug 2026, 02:0419,593-3
29 Aug 2026, 00:1419,596-5
28 Aug 2026, 03:1719,601-4
27 Aug 2026, 05:2319,605+3
26 Aug 2026, 03:5419,602+4
25 Aug 2026, 02:4519,598-7
23 Aug 2026, 18:2419,605+14
22 Aug 2026, 04:5819,591+42
20 Aug 2026, 23:5519,549-3
19 Aug 2026, 21:0619,552-6
17 Aug 2026, 20:1619,558-6
16 Aug 2026, 20:1519,564-7
15 Aug 2026, 08:1719,571-9
14 Aug 2026, 01:1519,580first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 19,558 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,270
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held39 (22 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total76,800
Reactions total2,462
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 28s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,602 reactions across 38 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,95034.8%
1,77331.6%
🤣1,28723.0%
👍4007.14%
🥰1031.84%
👌300.536%
🎉200.357%
🤩180.321%
👏90.161%
😐80.143%
🌚40.071%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,602 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 38 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @book_movie_guide. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC≈1,790 views80 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍48🔥29🤣3

28 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC≈3,040 views130 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

😎 подруженьки дарят

🔥126👍31

27 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC≈2,980 views120 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣10313🔥4

25 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC≈12,500 views85 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Время хоа-хоа-хоа наступает. Сегодня купила гирлянду в виде 🍁 кленовых листочков и свечей (нафига? Хз, радостно)))

64👍12🔥7😐2

23 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC≈3,610 views72 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Выходные🍁 Читать 4 тома Тихого Дона 🫣 Читать фф на 4к страниц 🙋‍♀

🔥684

22 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC≈3,780 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Девочки-красавицы, пришлите Правильное решение, Неправильные вещи, решила читать по порядку, а не только Аукцион💋

👌151

22 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC≈3,920 views87 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Эволюция приводит к появлению человека, а человек долго и мучительно обретает человечность… В этом романе, продолжающем знаменитую эпопею Дэна Симмонса, мы снова попадаем в мир ИскИнов, космических Бродяг, и великой реки Тетис, пересекающей множество миров. Трое отважных странников путешествуют по бесконечной реке в поисках овеянной легендами Старой Земли, и в тяжелом, смертельно опасном плавании им помогает таинст

73👍10🔥4

17 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC≈4,730 views236 reactionsread 3 September 2026

The New York Times составила список 50 лучших книг-триллеров XXI века 1. Исчезнувшая», Гиллиан Флинн, 2012 г.✅️ 2. «Таинственная река», Деннис Лихэйн, 2001 г. 3. «В лесу», Тана Френч, 2007 г.✅️ 4. «Девушка с татуировкой дракона», Стиг Ларссон, 2008 г.✅️ 5. «Старикам тут не место», Кормак Маккарти, 2005 г. 6. «Моя сестра, серийный убийца», Ойинкан Брейтуэйт, 2018 г. 7. «Бог лесов», Лиз Мур, 2024 г. 8. «​​Слезы лезвия

🔥16260👍14

14 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈4,480 views303 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Все, можно жить!) Он огромный

🔥23544👍24

13 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC≈4,420 views260 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Никогда не покупайте это! Как прошёл день? Хз, мимо

🔥183🤣47👍219

13 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈4,840 views215 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Все планы пошли сегодня в зад Ваши ставки когда я закончу😆

🔥164👍28🤩128👌3

12 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC≈4,390 views121 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Огромный соблазн заниматься сборкой до утра, только силой воли отрываю себя от стула🫠

🥰57🔥4811👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @book_movie_guide. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Аня смотрит сериалы
@book_movie_guide_kino · 49,544
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
Киноблогер с хвостатыми | syilers
@syilers26 · 102,623
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Аня читает” (@book_movie_guide), 19,558 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/book_movie_guide.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.