Channel
@egor_bernacki
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
472subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002021559084 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @egor_bernacki |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/egor_bernacki |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:07 | 472 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:08 | 476 | -3 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 05:36 | 479 | -1 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 11:20 | 480 | -1 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 481 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 483 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 484 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 488 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 488 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 21 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
122 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 30 | 24.6% | |
| 💯 | 30 | 24.6% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 21.3% | |
| 😁 | 17 | 13.9% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 10.7% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.64% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.82% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.82% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.82% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2025 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А ВДРУГ… Для максимизации индивидуальных положительных результатов имеет смысл рассматривать различные жизненные ситуации через призму «а вдруг». Например: вас пригласили на прием к 12, но вы пришли в 11:30, почему бы не попробовать попасть пораньше? Ведь А ВДРУГ вас примут, и вы сэкономите 30 минут; Попросить у начальства повышения: А ВДРУГ повысят; Предложить, если вы частный мастер, доп. услугу, А ВДРУГ купят и …
❤6🤝1
Мне сильно не нравится нарушать обещания… И как-то я в этом канале написал, что обязательно сниму видос про доминантность и поделюсь им здесь, так вот… Он поздно или рано будет 👀
❤4🔥2
Про «заступаться за «слабых»»
🔥3❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4👏2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤6
Почему совки такие истероидные? Нередко народец около пенсионного возраста общается с теми, кто «слабее», например со своим чадо, слишком примативно (крики, оскорбления, желание съязвить). Поразмвшляв над этим вопросом, я пришел к выводу, что такое поведение обусловлено тем лицемерием и позерством, которое являются неотъемлемой частью их жизни. С незнакомыми людьми, с теми кто их «сильнее»(доминантнее), например, …
💯6🥰1
Soon
😁4❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁8👍2
Универсальный способ стать богатым с нуля 1) Компетенция. Любой человек, проживающий в цивилизованной стране имеет доступ к информации, которой достаточно, чтобы стать начинающим специалистом в любой отрасли. Если найденной информации недостаточно, нужно нанять ментора/пойти в обучающие учреждение. Деньги на вышеуказанное нужно заработать на той деятельности, которая не требует особых компетенций. 2) Опыт. Как т…
👍11❤1
Про постсоветское скудоумное быдло
🔥6
Уверенное поведение = состояние + самоуважение Состояние = регулярно находиться в той сфере, где хочешь чувствовать себя уверенно + здоровый гормональный уровень Самоуважение = максимизация действий за которые испытываешь гордость + минимизация действий, за которые испытываешь стыд
👍11
Затрагивая религию, отдельно хочется пройтись по бойцам, которые наивно считают себя религиозными и которых ни разу не смущает то, чем они занимаются… Я, как человек продолжительное время занимавшийся единоборствами, всегда кринжевал с этих персонажей, которые реально верят, что если они будут носить крестик и раз в год заглядывать в церковь, то бог поможет им набить ебальник ближнему своему на потеху полупьяной пуб…
💯9🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @egor_bernacki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Егор Адекватный” (@egor_bernacki), 472 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/egor_bernacki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.