Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 41 days, net -177. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,188–9,419 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 20:15
9,215
-19
13 Sept 2026, 09:59
9,234
-14
9 Sept 2026, 11:56
9,248
-26
4 Sept 2026, 08:59
9,274
-22
31 Aug 2026, 15:58
9,296
-8
28 Aug 2026, 23:28
9,304
-12
26 Aug 2026, 04:36
9,316
-17
23 Aug 2026, 03:25
9,333
-15
19 Aug 2026, 14:43
9,348
-2
16 Aug 2026, 22:14
9,350
-14
14 Aug 2026, 02:17
9,364
-18
10 Aug 2026, 16:12
9,382
-8
7 Aug 2026, 19:41
9,390
-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:15
9,392
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:05
9,392
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 23 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.72%
avg views ÷ 9,215 subscribers
Avg views / post
711
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
28 (23 April 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
2,845
Reactions total
66
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,206 reactions across 28 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
589
48.8%
👍
367
30.4%
🔥
200
16.6%
💯
50
4.15%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,206 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 28 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lotosus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 April 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Как ускорить или замедлить время.
Вы тоже заменили, что если ждать какого-то определенного времени, например окончания какого-то скучного мероприятия или посадки в аэропорту, или общественного транспорта, то время тянется невероятно долго. Такое ощущение, что ты буквально ощущаешь как тикает каждая секунда. Минуты тянутся часами!
А если внимание чем-то поглощено, чем-то интересным или ты просто с головой уходишь в …
Управление умом начинается не с контроля мыслей!
Вы не всегда можете выбрать, какая мысль появится первой. Но можете научиться решать, какую мысль продолжать, а какую оставить без внимания.
Именно способность возвращать внимание по собственному выбору отличает управляемый ум от ума, который постоянно уводит вас за случайными импульсами.
В новом видео - как перестать быть ведомым собственным мышлением и вернуть себ…
Даосизм учит парадоксальной вещи: не всякая сила требует усилия.
Лао-цзы сравнивал мудрого человека с водой. Вода мягка, не спорит с препятствием, не пытается доказать свою мощь - но именно поэтому со временем преодолевает даже камень.
Мы привыкли считать, что любую проблему нужно «продавить». Больше контроля, больше напряжения, больше борьбы. Но иногда именно это и создаёт сопротивление.
Принцип у-вэй - не бездей…
Даосы столетиями развивали практики, которые тренируют удерживать внимание, не вовлекаться в автоматический поток мыслей, быстрее выходить из ментального хаоса и сохранять ясность в эмоционально напряжённых состояниях.
В сборнике - 8 даосских практик работы с умом и вниманием: концентрация, внутреннее созерцание, работа с дыханием, мыслями, образами и состоянием покоя. У каждой практики - своя задача, принцип, техни…
Мы редко реагируем на сам факт. Мы реагируем на его интерпретацию.
Кто-то сказал резкую фразу - это событие.
«Меня унизили», «со мной так нельзя», «я должен ответить» - уже суждения, которые запускают гнев, обиду и желание защищаться.
Марк Аврелий писал: «В твоей власти не составлять суждения о происходящем — и тем самым сохранять спокойствие. Внешние вещи не обладают властью формировать наши суждения».
Контроль …
Большинство людей теряют контроль над своей жизнью незаметно. Не потому, что кто-то сильнее их, а потому что они сами каждый день отдают внимание тревоге, чужому мнению, конфликтам и бесконечному внутреннему шуму.
Куда уходит внимание - туда уходит и ваша энергия. Если вы постоянно проживаете чужие эмоции, прокручиваете старые обиды, боитесь оценки и принимаете решения из страха, внешнему миру уже не нужно вами упра…
Чужие слова или поступки действительно могут задеть. Но часто основное страдание начинается уже после события - когда мы снова и снова прокручиваем его в голове, придумываем ответы, ищем объяснения и мысленно продолжаем конфликт.
Полезно разделять две вещи: что произошло и что вы продолжаете об этом думать.
Чужое поведение не всегда зависит от вас. Но вы можете заметить момент, когда событие уже закончилось, а ваш …
❗️В момент гнева кажется, что вы особенно ясно видите ситуацию. Но психолог Пол Экман описывал рефрактерный период - состояние, в котором сильная эмоция сужает восприятие.
«Цель - осознать, что вы действуете под влиянием эмоции, и сократить рефрактерный период».
Разозлившись, человек замечает главным образом то, что подтверждает его злость. Нейтральные слова воспринимаются как нападение, вспоминаются старые обиды, …
🗣КАК МЫ НЕЗАМЕТНО ПРОГРАММИРУЕМ СЕБЯ
Французский аптекарь Эмиль Куэ заметил, что люди, уверенные в своём выздоровлении, нередко легче переносили лечение. Это наблюдение привело его к идее сознательного самовнушения - способности влиять на своё состояние с помощью повторяющихся мыслей и внутренних образов.
Каждый раз, когда человек говорит себе: «А что обо мне подумают?», «Я недостаточно уверен» или «Мне всегда не в…
👍17❤13🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @lotosus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@lotosus edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Биохакинг | Саморазвитие @bioarcana · 45,773 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 28 August 2026
🕉 СТУПЕНИ СОЗНАНИЯ @StupenySoznaniya · 38,643 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Апгрейд сознания” (@lotosus), 9,215 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lotosus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.