3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,474–1,475 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 09:52
1,475
+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:32
1,474
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:20
1,474
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 10 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.4%
avg views ÷ 1,475 subscribers
Avg views / post
390
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held
8 (10 January 2026 – 26 July 2026)
Views total
390
Reactions total
24
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 52s
Average length
1m 26s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
195 reactions across 8 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
49
25.1%
❤🔥
47
24.1%
🔥
42
21.5%
⚡
15
7.69%
😁
13
6.67%
😍
11
5.64%
👍
3
1.54%
😭
3
1.54%
🙈
3
1.54%
🎉
2
1.03%
🏆
2
1.03%
🥰
2
1.03%
🌚
1
0.513%
👀
1
0.513%
🤩
1
0.513%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🥵 22 июля состоялось заседание оргкомитета Х Кубка CTF России — на нём утвердили регламент проведения соревнования в этом году.
В 2026 году появится новый зачёт для обучающихся по программам среднего профессионального образования (СПО). Соревнование за кубки пройдёт в 4 номинациях:
😤 школьники,
😤 обучающиеся по программам СПО,
😤 студенты вузов,
😤 смешанный зачёт.
Этапы проведения Х Кубка CTF России
😏Отборочный — 31…
✨ Запускаем рубрику интервью ✨
Первый спикер — Георгий Зайцев — игрок команды kks, сотрудник Positive Technologies, наставник и руководитель олимпиадного отделения по ИБ и CTF в Московской школе программистов, кружках Т-Поколения и ОЦ «Взлёт».
↖️ Дублируем ссылочки на платформы:
• forkbomb.ru — как одну из основных платформ в рунете с огромным количеством базовых простых тасков, так ещё и с разборами некоторых слож…
До конца регистрации на GO CTF TATARSTAN остаётся всего неделя
Если ты всё ещё «думаешь, успеешь ли мы подать заявку», считай это последним мягким напоминанием: сейчас самое время зафиксировать состав, выбрать капитана и оформить команду.
Регистрация открыта до 22 мая, 12:00 (мск) — после этого окно закрывается, и в отбор 23 мая заходят только те, кто успел зайти в систему и подтвердить участие.
@goctfofficial | 2…
🤩 28 марта состоится отборочный этап соревнования в онлайн-формате Task-Based «CyberCraft 2026»
Финал: 11-14 мая, г. Воронеж.
Успейте подать заявку, регистрация закроется 27 марта в 12:00!
Канал: https://t.me/vrn_ctf.
Сайт: http://vrnctf.ru.
Чат: https://t.me/vrnctfchat.
👋 Регистрация на XIV Летнюю школу CTF открыта!
Традиционно школа пройдет в уютной, богатой природой лесопарковой зоне УОК «Лесное озеро» в Солнечногорском районе Подмосковья.
В этом году планируются 2 смены:
🔵Первая (29 июля-3 августа) предназначена для начинающих CTF-ров от 13 до 19 лет, у участников с лучшими результатами есть шанс пройти на вторую смену.
🔵Вторая (3-15 августа) от 14 до 25 лет, но для тех, кто уж…
🔥Участники команды-победителя Академического зачета IX Кубка CTF России — VDNKh — поделились, как проходило соревнование их глазами
Подробнее..
❔ А как прошёл Кубок у вас?
Делитесь впечатлениями и самыми запомнившимися моментами!
лучшие рассказы попадут в канал
В цифровом саркофаге
И это не про 12 дней новогодних алко-утех, друзья 🤣
Схватка белых хакеров, DDos-атака, виртуальный плен, комиксы и финальная битва при ВДНХ — это все про мега-проект, частью которого я являюсь уже второй год! Наконец-то собралась с силами рассказать.
В декабре меня, наконец, занесло в логово IX Кубка CTF России — крупнейшего в стране кибертурнира для юных этичных хакеров. Получила мерча пачку,…
Вспомним, как прошел финал IX Кубка CTF
⏩День 1 — Финал Школьного зачета
⏩День 2 — Полуфинал Смешанного и Академического зачетов
⏩День 3 — Финал Смешанного и Академического зачетов
Приятного просмотра! 😉
❤🔥14❤9🔥7🥰2😍2🤩1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ctf_cup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 883,977 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кубок CTF России | Канал” (@ctf_cup), 1,475 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ctf_cup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
