Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

😼 Ugam

@orkchanel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

330subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001965570769
TypeChannel
Username@orkchanel
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/orkchanel

Growth

330331330.57 Aug 2026, 08:46 — 331 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:16 — 331 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:41 — 330 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:468 Aug 2026, 07:41
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 330–331 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:41330-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:16331no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:46331first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.1%
avg views ÷ 330 subscribers
Avg views / post
89.4
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (28 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,699
Reactions total76
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2330.3%
2228.9%
🥰1215.8%
👏67.89%
🔥56.58%
🤝22.63%
🤯22.63%
🖕11.32%
😐11.32%
🤔11.32%
🥴11.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC28 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @morazzidan_lifePhoto

И еще одна интересная ситуация в этих ваших интернетах Фабула: агрессивная антипрививочница нашла негативные комментарии (с матом и оскорблениями, конечно же) и обратилась в клинику, в которой работала врач. Клиника отреагировала весьма странно и уволила сотрудника, который, кстати, не позиционировал себя сотрудником в социальных сетях и не связывал себя с компанией (напоминает пост выше, да?) Развитие: один из нес

👍1😐1

7 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC50 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

5 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC55 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, всем привет! Назрел небольшой, но важный статус-апдейт по моим музыкальным изысканиям. Я тут практически закончил сводить и пересводить свой многострадальный нейроальбом, и, если подводить какой-то честный внутренний итог, мне этот релиз сейчас категорически не нравится 🎧 И дело тут вообще не в грязных нейросетевых стемах, не в пластиковых артефактах генерации или кривых частотах, при желании и наличии врем

5 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC63 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Пусть будет ещё один пост в контексте сугубо личного. Сегодня я попробую разобрать довольно старый трек Noize MC - «Это был дождь». Я впервые услышал эту песню, когда мне было лет четырнадцать. Если честно, тогда она казалась мне откровенно попсовой, слишком прямолинейной и слепленной по классическим лекалам подростковой радио-драмы. И, если переслушать ее сейчас, сквозь призму прожитых лет и накопленного опыта, это

🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC61 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Риск-менеджмент - это далеко не просто скучная корпоративная дисциплина с бесконечными экселевскими табличками, а важнейший навык выживания, и сегодня я хочу наглядно разобрать этот тезис на абсолютно диком примере нашего отечественного e-commerce 📦 Для начала нужно вспомнить одну старую, но безупречно работающую концепцию: «канарейка в угольной шахте». Шахтеры брали с собой под землю клетку с птицей, и если канарей

🤔1

4 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC138 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Честно говоря, я до сих пор пребываю в легком ступоре от реакций и комментариев под моим прошлым личным постом. В самом хорошем смысле этого слова, и за этот фидбек вам летит огроменное спасибо! Но сегодня я пришел к вам совершенно с другим вайбом и мыслями. Вчера мне рассказали историю одной незрячей девочки, которой едва исполнилось двадцать лет, но она уже успела пережить такой кромешный пиздец, что от этого физи

👍52🤝1🥰1

4 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC73 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А я напоминаю: 13.09.2026 мск

1👍1🥰1

3 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC99 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я бы мог сейчас выкатить очередной гигантский лонгрид про новые блокировки, закручивание гаек и тотальную деградацию сетевой инфраструктуры, но, если честно, меня это уже в край заебало. Все и так сидят в перманентном ахуе от происходящего треша, а плодить аналитику ради аналитики - не интересно. Поэтому будет пост о нашем горячо любимом Т-Банке, который из каждого утюга агрессивно пиарит свой хваленый «Нейрощит», пр

2👍1🔥1🥰1

3 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC80 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.securitylab.ru/blog/personal/LifeHack/361703.php Важное и интересное! Вопрос про simки и влияние инета становится ещё более интересным, но я уже писал вот тут: https://t.me/orkchanel/3460

1👍1🥰1

31 Jul 2026, 20:57 UTC109 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Вообще, вдогонку к предыдущему лонгриду, этот текст - ещё и своеобразный ответ на периодически прилетающие мне возгласы в духе: «Чувак, ебать ты умный, как ты вообще всё это успеваешь и вывозишь!». Нет, я не умный, а просто по-своему ебанутый 🤷‍♂️ И никакой не гений, а вся эта мнимая сверхпродуктивность строится исключительно на том, что мой мозг из-за бага в нейрохимии работает на аномально высоких тактовых частота

2👍1🥰1

31 Jul 2026, 19:49 UTC142 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если кому-то вдруг будет интересно заглянуть в мою голову, то сегодня я расскажу, что такое СДВГ, как работает гиперфокус, почему после него наступает тотальная серость, и каково это жить в состоянии «хочу, могу, обладаю всеми компетенциями, но физически, сука, не могу заставить себя сделать». Здравствуйте, это я, и жить с такой операционкой в голове реально весело. К слову, буквально сегодня я узнал, что в природе

6👍5🔥1🤝1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @orkchanel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 565,018 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“😼 Ugam” (@orkchanel), 330 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orkchanel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.