Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Расследились тут

@sled_tut

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,080subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001487681871
TypeChannel
Username@sled_tut
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 12 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sled_tut

Growth

2,0772,0852,0816 August 2026 — 2,077 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,077 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,085 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,080 subscribers2,0806 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,076–2,086 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 00:532,080-5
9 Aug 2026, 07:522,085+8
6 Aug 2026, 06:192,077no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:502,077first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 June 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

123 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5948.0%
👍5544.7%
🤯54.07%
💯21.63%
🤔10.813%
🤡10.813%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2021 to 16 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
56
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sled_tut. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2021 to 16 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Mar 2026, 11:45 UTC≈50,600 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

По следам выступления на конфе. И вдогонку, что различные инструменты точно не умеют вытаскивать из TikTok на данный момент: 1) старые аватарки 2) связанные с аккаунтом email, если он не указан в описании профиля или его не принесли в клюве уточки 3) старые юзер- и никнеймы, а также даты их смены, кроме самой последней 4) все комментарии конкретного пользователя

🔥7👍3

14 Mar 2026, 07:15 UTC≈1,370 views5 reactions50 Starsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @osint_mindsetPhoto

Второй докладчик OSINT mindset conference #10 расскажет, как искать информацию в TikTok ✅ sled_tut — Пока играет рилс: Проводим расследование в TikTok быстро "Тик-так..." - неумолимо уходят часы за листанием ленты и просмотром коротких видео. Парадоксальным образом нам кажется, что так мы экономим время, спрессовывая впечатления, лайфхаки, сюжеты новых серий и целые нарративы в 15-30 секунд, но фундаментальные зак

💯2🔥2👍1

16 Aug 2025, 09:03 UTC≈4,140 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Я готовлюсь к Оффзону, и мне нужно больше данных. Пожалуйста, помогите мне, ответив на следующий вопрос. Каналов какого типа (из перечисленных ниже) больше всего среди ваших подписок в Телеграме? (не предлагаю считать точно, ориентируйтесь по ощущениям)

  1. 📰Новостные (разного рода СМИ)23%
  2. 💻Профессиональные (по OSINT, маркетингу, разработке и т.п.)56%
  3. 🤡Мемные7%
  4. 👫Лайфстайл (напоминающие публичные дневники: с кем повидались, что поели, купили и т.д.)3%
  5. 🛍Рекламные (каналы брендов, суть которых в продвижении своих товаров и услуг)1%
  6. 🎨Авторские (обычно блоги "креаторов", переехавшие в ТГ с других площадок)8%
  7. ❓Другое (пишите в комментариях)2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jun 2025, 13:36 UTC≈31,300 views22 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026
File

Тянула с выкладкой, потому что в первый раз удосужилась залить на Гитхаб самую первую версию скрипта, в которой даже Эластик ещё не фигурировал (а я им так гордилась, так гордилась...). В общем, ссылка на обновленный код.

🔥13👍5🤯3🤡1

26 May 2025, 15:01 UTC≈3,190 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @osint_mindsetPhoto

Начинаем публиковать анонсы докладов OSINT mindset conference #7! На первом докладе поговорим про поиск по Telegram 🔍 sled_tut — Ваша мама в сетке: раскрываем неочевидные связи между телеграм-каналами В "сетку" принято выделять каналы, неявно принадлежащие одному владельцу. Чаще всего их подписчики скрыты, и о связях между ресурсами приходится судить по косвенным признакам: цитатам и репостам, в чём немалую помощь

🔥4👍3🤔1

19 May 2025, 15:26 UTC≈2,410 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мамские каналы никогда ещё не были такими затягивающими. Кухня, дети... и церковь евангельских христиан-баптистов? ШТО А ещё Pyrogram, Elasticsearch и NetworkX.

🔥3

19 May 2025, 15:26 UTC≈2,150 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @osint_mindset

Уже скоро OSINT mindset conference #7! А значит мы готовы представить наших спикеров: 🔥 sled_tut — Ваша мама в сетке: раскрываем неочевидные связи между телеграм-каналами nicksinus — Портрет закладки Adk — Gaming OSINT crytech7 — Messages Sent to the Void: Tracking Transactions to Ethereum Null Address Riaria — Как интернет, технологии и социальные сети портят жизнь тем, кто ворует искусство Помимо докладов мы,

🔥2👍1

3 Nov 2024, 19:11 UTC≈3,400 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Про анонимность Гугл-форм Когда я ещё училась математике, то считала, что задачи проще, чем исследовать функцию на отрезке, трудно себе представить. Надо только помнить о значениях в крайних точках - они могут таить в себе сюрпризы. Я не стала тестировщиком, но с тех пор всегда думаю о них о границах Римской Империи: крайние положения, граничные точки, предельные значения - обо всех крайних случаях. Что, если автор

👍10🔥8🤯2

9 Apr 2024, 14:51 UTC≈2,940 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @osint_mindset

Начинаем публиковать записи докладов OSINT mindset conference #2! На первом докладе поговорим о поиске научных публикаций 🔬 VKolenickova: OSINT. Ну, знаете, ради науки Ссылка на пост с презентацией к докладу 🌐Site | 💬 Forum | 🔍 Family |▶YT

👍5🔥3

10 Mar 2024, 09:52 UTC≈2,880 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Лучший файлообменник - это Twitter* Долго выбирала предлог, но в итоге сошлюсь на то, что для меня неделя пролетела как один день: только этим можно извинить то, что ещё в прошлую субботу я пообещала завтра выложить ещё пару способов обойти пейвол, за которым скрываются последние достижения науки (и это не гипербола: в конце концов, Sci-Hub и ряд подобных ему ресурсов действительно перестали обновляться в 2020 году,

🔥4👍2

4 Mar 2024, 16:06 UTC≈11,600 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

В субботу вспоминала студенческие годы (а теперь заблокируйте, пожалуйста, эти воспоминания обратно) на OSINT mindset conference #2. Теперь кому-то, надеюсь, придётся мучиться меньше, чем мне при написании очередной paper. Выкладываю презентацию с выступления и напоминаю: даже если диплом вам пишет ChatGPT (хочется подчеркнуть: "особенно если..."), без валидного списка материалов всё равно не обойтись. Как его собра

👍7🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sled_tut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2025, 09:03 UTCAnonymous Poll462 voters

Я готовлюсь к Оффзону, и мне нужно больше данных. Пожалуйста, помогите мне, ответив на следующий вопрос. Каналов какого типа (из перечисленных ниже) больше всего среди ваших подписок в Телеграме? (не предлагаю считать точно, ориентируйтесь по ощущениям)

  1. 📰Новостные (разного рода СМИ)23%
  2. 💻Профессиональные (по OSINT, маркетингу, разработке и т.п.)56%
  3. 🤡Мемные7%
  4. 👫Лайфстайл (напоминающие публичные дневники: с кем повидались, что поели, купили и т.д.)3%
  5. 🛍Рекламные (каналы брендов, суть которых в продвижении своих товаров и услуг)1%
  6. 🎨Авторские (обычно блоги "креаторов", переехавшие в ТГ с других площадок)8%
  7. ❓Другое (пишите в комментариях)2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2021 to 16 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 924,188 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Расследились тут” (@sled_tut), 2,080 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sled_tut.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.