Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AppleInsider.ru #новости

@appleinsider

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

33,091subscribers

+183 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001003766370
TypeChannel
Username@appleinsider
DescriptionОфициальный канал сайта AppleInsider.ru Реклама - [email protected]
Created3 November 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/appleinsider

Growth

32,90833,09132,999.55 August 2026 — 32,908 subscribers6 August 2026 — 32,908 subscribers6 August 2026 — 32,920 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,929 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,965 subscribers9 August 2026 — 33,001 subscribers10 August 2026 — 33,033 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,055 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,061 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,070 subscribers15 August 2026 — 33,091 subscribers5 August 202615 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net +183. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,881–33,118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:2333,091+21
13 Aug 2026, 14:5833,070+9
12 Aug 2026, 11:0733,061+6
11 Aug 2026, 11:3233,055+22
10 Aug 2026, 10:0133,033+32
9 Aug 2026, 11:5133,001+36
8 Aug 2026, 11:4732,965+36
7 Aug 2026, 10:0732,929+9
6 Aug 2026, 07:0032,920+12
6 Aug 2026, 01:5132,908no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:1132,908first reading

Engagement

160 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.26%
avg views ÷ 33,091 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,400
160 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.319%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
160
of 160 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 136 of 160 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held160 (4 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total384,330
Reactions total1,063
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 01:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
28,600
Videos
632
Links
27,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

885 reactions across 105 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍16018.1%
15517.5%
👎11212.7%
💩9711.0%
🤡889.94%
🤣677.57%
🔥515.76%
🤮171.92%
😁151.69%
🤔141.58%
🥱131.47%
👏121.36%
🤯101.13%
😨91.02%
🤬91.02%
🖕80.904%
👌60.678%
🍾50.565%
🎉40.452%
💊40.452%
13 further kinds293.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 136 of the 160 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,063reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 160 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 160 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @appleinsider. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 160 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC≈1,000 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🤡2

Signed SilentWhisperOrange

14 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,570 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Как выбрать повербанк с AliExpress: от карманных моделей до «кирпичей» на 50000 мАч Каждый раз, когда розетка внезапно оказывается «где-то там», мы вспоминаем, что внешний аккумулятор давно уже не запасной гаджет, а почти обязательный пункт снаряжения. Особенно когда на даче вырубают свет, в поездке садится iPhone, а роутер внезапно решает уйти в отпуск вместе с электричеством. В этот раз мы собрали десяток поверба

👍21💩1

Signed i10sys_bot

14 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC≈1,500 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Повербанк KUULAA Qi2 за 1700 рублей, 5000 мАч, меньше сантиметра толщиной и с MagSafe на 15 Вт. Звучит слишком хорошо, и я две недели проверял, где именно производитель приврал. Замеры, реальная скорость и нюансы — там много букв, но если присматриваетесь к компактным повербанкам, пригодится.

Signed autopur_bot

14 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,810 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

МТС запустил «Глобальный доступ» к зарубежным сервисам без VPN и прокси Каждый раз, когда на Айфоне внезапно исчезает нужное приложение или оплата в зарубежном сервисе упирается в отказ карты, мы вспоминаем все известные VPN и прокси. Теперь МТС предлагает обойтись без этого зоопарка и обещает доступ к Spotify, Netflix, Ticketmaster и Strava прямо из «Мой МТС» с оплатой со счёта телефона. Звучит заманчиво, но есть

🤡5💩4👍1

Signed i10sys_bot

14 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,960 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Удалят ли Apple приложения, которые не работают с VPN, и что уже происходит с российскими сервисами Каждую неделю нам обещают новый апокалипсис в App Store: то все VPN сломаются, то приложения пачками выкинут за «неправильную» работу. Теперь очередь дошла до программ, которые конфликтуют с VPN, и заголовки снова кричат о грядущей чистке. Мы внимательно прошли по следам этих страшилок: перечитали App Store Review Gu

👍4👎1

Signed i10sys_bot

14 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈2,080 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Apple рассылает предупреждения о шпионском ПО на iPhone: что это за уведомления и кому они приходят Берем iPhone, смотрим на экран блокировки и вместо привычных чатов видим сообщение от Apple о попытке взлома с помощью наемного шпионского ПО. Не фишинговая СМСка, а вполне официальное уведомление, которое уже получили пользователи в 110 странах. Звучит так, будто нас записали в герои политического триллера, хотя мы в

2

Signed i10sys_bot

14 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,980 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Стеклянный iPhone 2027: что задумала Apple с изогнутым корпусом и «бесконечным» экраном Кажется, историю со стеклянным iPhone нас решили покатать на американских горках: сначала «отмена», потом внезапное продолжение проекта и новые детали корпуса. В итоге к юбилею первого Айфона нам обещают редизайн с изогнутыми стеклянными панелями и тонкой металлической рамкой по периметру. Инсайдеры описывают эффект визуально бе

2

Signed i10sys_bot

14 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,800 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Складной айфон не доедет дальше США на старте Эппл столько лет наблюдала, как Samsung, Huawei и куча китайцев сменили по три-четыре поколения фолдов (ну, складных смартфонов), и вот наконец собралась выпустить свой, iPhone Ultra. Собралась и не смогла: инсайдеры пишут, что серийные образцы не проходят контроль качества, плюс банально не хватает памяти на одновременный выпуск с iPhone 18 Pro. В итоге на старте устрой

2👎1🤣1

Signed autopur_bot

14 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,850 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Posted without readable text

2

Signed SilentWhisperOrange

14 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈2,000 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Сколько свободной памяти нужно оставлять на iPhone для нормальной работы Мы все умеем героически чистить айфон в последний момент, когда уже прилетело «Хранилище почти заполнено» и ничего не ставится. А вот понять, сколько места лучше держать свободным заранее, чтобы не жить в этом стрессе, почему‑то почти никто толком не объясняет. В статье разбираемся, откуда взялось правило про десять процентов, почему оно доста

3

Signed i10sys_bot

14 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈1,970 views9 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Если Apple прислала уведомление о шпионской атаке, не игнорируйте Apple разослала новую волну пуш-уведомлений пользователям в 110 странах, чьи устройства могли стать целью шпионского ПО. Прямо на экране блокировки появляется сообщение: «Apple обнаружила атаку на ваш iPhone». Всего с 2021 года компания предупредила людей в более чем 150 странах, и это не параноя: именно благодаря таким уведомлениям, например, раскрыл

6🗿3

Signed autopur_bot

Showing the 12 most recent of 160 posts we hold for @appleinsider. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 33,335 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Apple Media
@media_apple · 127,776
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AppleInsider.ru #новости” (@appleinsider), 33,091 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/appleinsider.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.