TradeMaster Insights is dedicated to offering premier cryptocurrency signals and training, equipping traders with the tools they need to succeed in the ever-evolving crypto market
For ads and VIP access - @insights_admin
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,128–6,199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 00:05
6,136
-41
8 Aug 2026, 08:11
6,177
-14
7 Aug 2026, 13:17
6,191
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 11 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.11%
avg views ÷ 6,136 subscribers
Avg views / post
191
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held
14 (11 February 2026 – 21 July 2026)
Views total
191
Reactions total
4
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,360
Videos
≈9
Links
≈1,270
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
22s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5
55.6%
👍
4
44.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TradeMaster_insight. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 February 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Earn up to $30,000
How can users get started?
1️⃣ Sign up as a new user
2️⃣ Fulfill the deposit and trading criteria to unlock bonuses within 14 days
3️⃣ Claim their bonuses in our Rewards Hub!
▫️A good way to earn a quick $15 or $50. You need to register, make a deposit of 100 or 1000 dollars, open several transactions in the amount of 100 or 2000 dollars and receive your bonus
👉 Up to $30,000 BONUS
BYBIT - h…
CHOW TRADE (Twitter)
RT @ramperxx: i found a pattern in 5-minute bitcoin markets
it's literally a way to make x100 in one trade
no bots needed, no technical analysis
just timing the last 1-2 seconds
let me explain how it works
the market is nearing completion
price fluctuates slightly, needs only $20-40 to hit the target level
in the last 10 seconds, shares price starts dropping sharply
everyone assumes the …
CHOW TRADE (Twitter)
i built a trading bot for the 5m markets on polymarket while everyone was celebrating valentines yesterday i spent the whole day testing the prototype tests went well, production soon....
CHOW TRADE (Twitter)
RT @lunatik_corp: $1,500 → $33,000 on 5min BTC markets in 2 days
This is the new reality.
It stops being gambling the moment you define an exact algorithm.
Here are the recommendations on how to create the same trading bot:
→ Write your code in Rust – it offers C++ level speed, and there’s an official polymarket-client-sdk available.
→ Minimize Latency – your trading bot must be deployed in…
CHOW TRADE (Twitter)
RT @Chance_: Who’s moving the markets?
Here’s the current Open Interest leaderboard:
➔ @Kalshi- $383M
➔ @Polymarket - $352M
➔ @opinionlabsxyz - $135M
➔ @predictdotfun - $25M
➔ @MyriadMarkets - $0.8M
➔ @trylimitless - $0.6M
Total Open Interest: ~ $896M
Soon you can trade on all of the platforms through Chance.
CHOW TRADE (Twitter)
RT @Mrcryptoxwhale: My 2026 bull run outlook:
February → Bear trap setting the stage
March → Bitcoin breakout gains momentum
April → Altcoins take the spotlight
May → New all-time high around $215K
June → Bull trap catches late buyers
July → Heavy liquidation wave
August → Bear market officially begins
For over a decade, I’ve consistently called major market tops and bottoms.
I was among the …
CHOW TRADE (Twitter)
RT @CarOnPolymarket: I tried out the new 5 minute Crypto Up and Down markets on Polymarket and I won 8 in a row
- 30 minutes traded
- Total PNL $200
That's $400 an hour!
poly.market/crypto-trading https://twitter.com/CarOnPolymarket/status/2021756740988191028#m
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @TradeMaster_insight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
8
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
8
vacant every time we have ever looked
@TradeMaster_insight named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@polymarket named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@chance_ named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@forecastex named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@lunatik_corp named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@proofofmaro named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@solanasensei named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@caronpolymarket named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@trylim named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Trading Crypto Bitcoin Signals @Trading_Crypto_Signals_Bitcoin · 1,051,337 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TradeMaster Insights” (@TradeMaster_insight), 6,136 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TradeMaster_insight.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.