Why the sudden sell pressure in market . After the release of FBI report about North Korea is trying to hack U.S. #Bitcoin ETFs to steal funds, and have deployed Hacker that can easily Steal Funds from ETFs , this create a fear environment and people are selling in Hacking Fear. Note (This is the official report release by the FBI .)

Channel
CRYPTO SAVVY 📉📈
@crypto_savvvy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
54subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002230200462 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_savvvy |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 26 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_savvvy |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 54 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 54 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 26 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2024 to 4 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
-60% held n bounced at core resistance. Break it and hold above and we are back in bizz $VISTA - https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xfdd05552f1377aa488afed744c8024358af02041 Distro change of hands > hold at core support levels while market corrects/shakes out shorter term traders > Onward $BONZI https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x970cf9b7346fbaea0588f03356a104100eb675e2
$EDOG — I've bought this on the post-launch dip bc the liquidity was thick, no other info https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x9b2517d91203c8496f5d50262cf9f0f07af365f5
Also aped some $BONZI, maybe mascot of vista ( https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x970cf9b7346fbaea0588f03356a104100eb675e2 -420k CA: 0xD6175692026BcD7Cb12A515e39cF0256eF35cb86 DEX: https://ethervista.app/
$VISTA — Faded this all of yesterday, wanted to buy this morning but had to buy off their website and faded > tech is teching and now getting love. I've bidded here at 4.5m. My vision is it does something like new tech like how Pandora did in Feb when it was omega slow, and ppl pick it up and other coins start forming > commence onchain ETH szn -A LOT of big wallets emptied earlier on the up move in the last hour~, m…
$CAT holding extremely well despite market chop continues for a few more weeks. Huge wallets continue on bidding (https://x.com/MacnBTC/status/1830257097747075455), CZ out end of Sept, looking forward to what the team can pull off when confidence returns. https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0x6df9adc1837bf37e0b1b943d59a7e50d9678c81b
Do you have the patience and hands to hold thru the lows for riches ser? $MEW
$VISTA — UP only trend found its range to break now at 30m. -60% approaching from ATH — 15m atm. 👉The beta coins ($BONZI) are holding pretty well considering this first "real" correction on $VISTA is going on rn. Lots of the 1%+ wallets have been unloading all day, distro is getting better. I reckon if it were to really start a run, bounce from -45~60% dip, retest new ATHs, crush it and rampage on. -Considering it we…
In such Short period of time BlackRock ETF accumulated 350,000 BTC in less than a year bringing BlackRock as third largest BTC holder after Satoshi and Binance. Let me repeat, this process happened within less a year, in times of fear & recession. Let me repeat it again, 350,000 BTC accumulated in very short time period, become the 3rd largest holder in a time of fear and uncertainty What IQ is needed to understand?
$CHUA next trend? 5x
October is historically one of the bullish months for crypto September is for buying i know i say it alot... MAKE MORE MONEY and buy more stuff You will be rewarded for buying dips!
👍1
$VANGOGH 5x to 5m now 4m send it to 10m
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @crypto_savvvy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@crypto_savvvy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Trading_Crypto_Signals_Bitcoin · 1,035,789
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO SAVVY 📉📈” (@crypto_savvvy), 54 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_savvvy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.