Channel
@RITFestChannel
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
403subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001162908337 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RITFestChannel |
| Description | Информационный канал РИТ++ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RITFestChannel |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 7 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @RITFestChannel/401 · this entry7 May 2025, 09:41 UTC | @PHPRussiaConfChannel/42622 May 2025, 09:02 UTC | 1.00 | 15 days |
| @PHPRussiaConfChannel/42924 Nov 2025, 11:38 UTC | @RITFestChannel/403 · this entry24 Nov 2025, 11:39 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @PHPRussiaConfChannel/43116 Dec 2025, 13:21 UTC | @RITFestChannel/404 · this entry16 Dec 2025, 13:22 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @RITFestChannel/406 · this entry11 Jun 2026, 06:53 UTC | @PHPRussiaConfChannel/43611 Jun 2026, 06:55 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @PHPRussiaConfChannel/43724 Jun 2026, 05:38 UTC | @RITFestChannel/407 · this entry24 Jun 2026, 06:50 UTC | 1.00 | 71 minutes |
| @FrontendConfChannel/129624 Nov 2025, 11:38 UTC | @RITFestChannel/403 · this entry24 Nov 2025, 11:39 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @PHPRussiaConfChannel | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2 minutes | @PHPRussiaConfChannel (5–3) |
| @FrontendConfChannel | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 72 seconds | @FrontendConfChannel (4–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 16 July 2021 to 29 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 7, the earliest publisher we hold is @RITFestChannel — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 6 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 403 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:20 | 403 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 July 2021 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 109 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Компании всё чаще внедряют агентную разработку, но пока сложно понять, насколько широко этот подход используется, какие сценарии действительно работают и с какими сложностями сталкиваются команды. Мы запускаем исследование адаптации агентной разработки и приглашаем вас принять в нём участие. Если в вашей компании уже используют AI-агентов — в разработке, тестировании, ревью кода или других процессах, — расскажите о…
🔥 Олег Бунин побывал в гостях у подкаста «FIDELINA». Получился большой разговор о том, как устроены и куда движутся профессиональные IT-конференции. ✅ Олег рассказал, как меняются конференции в эпоху искусственного интеллекта: про трансформацию формата, организацию мероприятий «под ключ», библиотеку знаний, исследования аудитории и главные ошибки, которые приводят к закрытию даже успешных событий. В выпуске: • как…
🚀 Главные AI-выходные года: от стратегии до живого кода Индустрия переходит от простых чат-ботов к автономным системам — AI-агентам. Чтобы вы не просто наблюдали за переменами, а возглавили их, мы подготовили трехдневный интенсив в Москве. Это серия событий для тех, кто хочет перестроить свои процессы и кратно вырасти в продуктивности. 📅 3 июля: Agentic Dev Conf Большая конференция об агентной архитектуре и будуще…
Друзья, поговорим о внедрении AI? Слишком много хайпа вокруг, слишком много инфоцыганства. В YouTube каждая вторая реклама про "Научу вайбкодить доходный бот" :) А давайте используем главный навык наших Программных комитетов, отточенный за десяток лет — отделять реальные работающие решения от хайпа и инфобиза? И применим его к тематике внедрения AI в жизненный цикл разработки. Поговорим на конференциях о качестве …
«Я устал слушать доклады, где всё идеально» «Я уже ничего не внедряю после конференций» «Я не могу услышать опыт компаний, похожих на мою» «Бигтехи говорят на своём языке, а мне это бесполезно» «У меня нет инсайтов — только слайды» Знакомые мысли? Мы это изменим, для этого наша команда придумала новый формат конференций — конференции развития. Конференция развития — инструмент решения задач, а не потребления конте…
Друзья, добрый день! Мы хотим обсудить с вами первые выводы из нашего двухмесячного исследования на тему "Что же не так с IT-конференциями?". Конечно, очень хочется сказать - это всё экономический кризис, конференции тут ни при чём 🙂 Но это было бы непростительно поверхностно. За последние пару месяцев мы (Онтико) поговорили с парой сотен человек: CTO, HRD, T&D, L&D, спикерами, членами ПК, участниками, в общем - с р…
Чтобы принимать верные решения и создавать прорывные продукты, нужно постоянно быть в потоке: знать последние тренды, иметь доступ к лучшим практикам и уметь быстро применять их в работе. Но как успевать за всем? Где брать время на поиск и фильтрацию тонн информации? Представляем вам Поддерживающую базу знаний — ваш персональный пропуск в мир экспертизы для разработчиков, архитекторов и лидеров цифровой индустрии. …
Цифровая экономика движется вперед — и ваши знания должны успевать за ней. Представляем Поддерживающую базу знаний Онтико — мощный ресурс для корпораций, команд и экспертов, которые ценят актуальную информацию и эффективные решения. Для кого это? ✔ Корпорации, которым важно решать прикладные задачи быстро и профессионально. ✔ Компании, стремящиеся сохранять экспертизу и передавать знания внутри команды. ✔ Специалист…
РИТ++ Channel pinned a photo
🔥 Друзья, не пропустите! 30 ноября и 1 декабря на конференции TeamLead Conf++ 2023 пройдёт открытый трек. Вы сможете посмотреть трансляцию Главного зала конференции бесплатно. Это стало возможным благодаря поддержке нашего генерального партнёра, компании Яндекс. ✅ Чтобы получить доступ к открытому треку, необходимо зарегистрироваться
🔥Последний день народного голосования Премии HighLoad++ ⠀ Друзья, напоминаем, что 15 октября (сегодня) у вас еще есть возможность выбрать самых достойных номинантов Премии HighLoad++. Каждый ваш голос - это благодарность IT-лидерам и их решениям за вклад в развитие экосистемы интернет-разработки в России. ⠀ В этом году компания VK поддержала специальную номинацию «Развивающие проекты», посвященную людям и проектам, …
РИТ++ Channel pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RITFestChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“РИТ++ Channel” (@RITFestChannel), 403 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RITFestChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.