Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net +24,473. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 222,860–254,976 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 19:01
251,270
+6,126
17 Sept 2026, 13:58
245,144
+1,480
15 Sept 2026, 11:59
243,664
-916
13 Sept 2026, 22:36
244,580
+1,419
12 Sept 2026, 05:58
243,161
+554
9 Sept 2026, 23:37
242,607
+465
6 Sept 2026, 15:37
242,142
+1,413
4 Sept 2026, 03:17
240,729
-826
2 Sept 2026, 16:15
241,555
+5,764
1 Sept 2026, 13:04
235,791
+2,311
31 Aug 2026, 13:06
233,480
-620
30 Aug 2026, 10:04
234,100
+1,232
29 Aug 2026, 12:35
232,868
+242
28 Aug 2026, 15:52
232,626
-499
27 Aug 2026, 17:34
233,125
-438
26 Aug 2026, 19:14
233,563
-630
25 Aug 2026, 16:32
234,193
+2,632
24 Aug 2026, 20:04
231,561
-927
23 Aug 2026, 02:27
232,488
+2,888
21 Aug 2026, 14:06
229,600
first reading
Engagement
493 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 131 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.0%
avg views ÷ 251,270 subscribers
Avg views / post
57,700
225 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
225
of 493 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 225 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
493 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
12,983,749
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 22:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,860
Videos
≈127
Links
≈1,190
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
76
across the posts below
Posts paid on
34
of 493 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Srylove. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 493 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
جالب اینجاست که بعضیها جلو خودت یه جور رفتار میکنن و پشت سرت یه جور دیگه.
روبهرو از اعتمادت حرف میزنن، اما وقتی پای حرف و عمل میرسه، اولین چیزی که کنار میذارن همون اعتماده.
نه از رفتارشون تعجب میکنم، نه دیگه حوصله دارم برای کسی توضیح بدم که چه چیزی رو فهمیدم.
هر آدمی حق داره خودش رو هرطور که میخواد نشون بده؛ منم حق دارم بعد از دیدن حقیقت، انتخاب کنم چه فاصلهای باهاش داشته باشم.
چون رابطهای که فقط با پنهان کردن وا…
سعی کن با کسی وارد رابطه بشی که اونقدر بالغ باشه که بگه ؛
بیا دربارش حرف بزنیم و باهم حلش کنیم،تا اینکه بچگانه رفتار کنه بازی های ذهنی راه بندازه و نادیدهت بگیره تا شاید جلب توجه کنه.
من هنوز آرزو دارم.
نه از اون آرزوهایی که فقط یه شب قبل خواب بهشون فکر میکنی؛ از اونایی که ته دلت نگهشون میداری و هرچقدر زندگی سخت میشه، باز یه گوشه از ذهنت روشن میمونه.
آرزو دارم یه روز صبح بیدار شم و ببینم چیزهایی که برای داشتنشون این همه صبر کردم، بلخره سهم من شدن.
یه زندگی آروم، یه دل سبک، چند نفر که بودنشون واقعی باشه و خودم که دیگه مجبور نباشم برای خوشحال بودن دنبال دلیل بگردم.
شاید رسیدن دیر شده باشه، اما تا و…
Signed Shadow
Showing the 12 most recent of 493 posts we hold for @Srylove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 493 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Srylove named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@vipchnl named in 2 posts, 18 August 2026 – 2 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
سآرا پلیلیست؛ @soulhealinglist · 1,036 (as read 12 August 2026)#77
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
•نقطهچین• @haparooutt · 35,194 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
فال روزانه کراش احساسی @fal_anii · 69,135 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 23 August 2026
[ تکست بیو ]️ @TxTBiwo · 37,127 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
• 𝙳𝙴𝙻𝚃𝙰𝙽𝙶 @Deltang · 26,463 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 September 2026
خاکستری. @immortal_me · 36,406 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
صیاسفید. @ciyacefid · 61,802 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
Lidocaine @Lidocaine · 88,668 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
Onism @Onissm · 501,204 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
𝐖𝐢𝐬𝐡 @xwish · 44,048 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 28 August 2026
dismaying @dismaying · 137,213 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
› AHNGE ME ‹ @ahnGeme · 108,539 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
STANCO @rahachannll · 214,292 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
-Girin- @girin · 32,668 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
« صِدای خندهات » @winstnchannel · 155,399 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
کتابخانهء نیمهشب. @perapranol · 90,391 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 August 2026
Typing... @typingnotes · 70,773 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 August 2026
موزیکام؛ @MusiC_OffiCiaal · 37,942 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 31 August 2026
•[ دپ موزیکـ ]• @Dep_MuSiCx · 51,140 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026
دختری که رهایش کردی. @d_Rhyshkrdi · 116,909 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
• مــ🌙ــاهـ دِلــمـ • @MAH128 · 26,668 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙞'𝙢 𝙎𝙤𝙧𝙧𝙮” (@Srylove), 251,270 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Srylove.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.