National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -14,348. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 225,224–243,876 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 22:06
227,376
-175
8 Nov 2026, 14:05
227,551
-109
7 Nov 2026, 11:26
227,660
-85
6 Nov 2026, 12:22
227,745
-145
5 Nov 2026, 15:15
227,890
-132
4 Nov 2026, 14:36
228,022
-104
3 Nov 2026, 11:29
228,126
+84
2 Nov 2026, 12:27
228,042
-132
1 Nov 2026, 13:27
228,174
-109
31 Oct 2026, 16:19
228,283
-129
30 Oct 2026, 15:40
228,412
-104
29 Oct 2026, 17:16
228,516
-120
28 Oct 2026, 16:20
228,636
-94
27 Oct 2026, 14:36
228,730
-108
26 Oct 2026, 16:17
228,838
-152
25 Oct 2026, 13:28
228,990
-75
24 Oct 2026, 12:56
229,065
-56
23 Oct 2026, 12:47
229,121
-135
22 Oct 2026, 09:49
229,256
-167
21 Oct 2026, 06:00
229,423
first reading
Engagement
3,137 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.14%
avg views ÷ 227,376 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,150
1,016 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,017
of 3,137 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 973 of 1,016 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
3,137 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
7,260,027
Reactions total
144,014
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 03:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈39,700
Videos
≈32,000
Links
≈507
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 59m
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 369 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
140,877 reactions across 948 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
30,168
21.4%
❤
20,651
14.7%
💔
18,218
12.9%
👍
17,561
12.5%
😐
16,464
11.7%
🖕
15,052
10.7%
💩
5,769
4.10%
🔥
2,217
1.57%
👎
2,106
1.49%
🍌
1,700
1.21%
🗿
1,385
0.983%
🥴
1,339
0.95%
😍
1,168
0.829%
😭
787
0.559%
🤡
711
0.505%
❤🔥
678
0.481%
👏
673
0.478%
🤯
646
0.459%
🥱
614
0.436%
🤪
387
0.275%
25 further kinds
2,583
1.83%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 956 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140,877 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 12 October 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 999 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IrJaavan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 12 October 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 166 of 1,017 posts held from the last 30 days (16.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴 امروز با حضور سردار عبداللهی و سردار موسوی از شهر موشکی جدید سپاه رونمایی شد اما در اثر بی توجهی تیم رسانه ای سپاه پلاک لانچر موشک سپاه سانسور نشده و از همین راه میشه حتی جای شهر موشکی رو پیدا کرد :
+گویا عمدا و برای رد گم کنی چنین پلاکایی نصب میکنن.
🔴 عاقبتِ خیانت! ریزش سنگین سهام شرکت آمریکایی NVIDIA، قلبِ هوش مصنوعی دنیا بعد از خیانت مدیرعاملش به زنش!
جنسن هوانگ، مدیرعامل تایوانی-آمریکایی شرکت انویدیا پس از ۴۰ سال ازدواج، با زنی به اسم «آلیس هوانگ» به زنش خیانت کرد!
حالا مشخص شده که آلیس هوانگ، جاسوس چین بوده و مأموریت جمعآوری اطلاعات از مدیرعامل انویدیا رو داشته.
هدفِ آلیس، دسترسی به اطلاعات حساس فناوری هوش مصنوعی و تراشههای انویدیا بوده.
حالا تو روزی که ک…
🔴یادی کنیم از سال ۲۰۰۳ و جایی که «جرج بوش» فقط یک بار «صدام حسین» رو تهدید کرد و همون یک بار رو هم عملی کرد و خبری از لغو عملیات نبود.
یه زمانی قدرت نظامی آمریکا همه رو میترسوند و هرکسی رو تهدید میکرد باید فرار میکرد ولی الان شده مایه خنده و تمسخر کشورهای دیگه. در گذشته برای پست ریاست جمهوری آمریکا برای کمدین ها؛ تاجرها و آدم های تحت تاثیر لابی کشورهای عربی جایی نبود. رئیس جمهور آمریکا نه بلوف میزد و نه اهل عملیات فر…
🔴دولت عراق به تیم ملی فوتبال ایران که میخواد بره اونجا تا با فلسطین بازی دوستانه انجام بده؛ مجوز پرواز نداد و کاروان ایران باید به صورت زمینی از آبادان به بصره بره.
فکر کن به بدبختی خودتو به یه کشور جنگ زده مثل عراق برسونی تا اونجا با یه کشور جنگ زده تر مثل فلسطین بازی دوستانه کنی.
🔴در حالیکه تورم سالانه ۷۷ درصده؛ دولت قراره برای سال دیگه؛ ۳۵ درصد حقوق ها رو افزایش بده و این یعنی قدرت خرید مردم سال دیگه نسبت به امسال نصف میشه.
احتمالا دیگه همین نون خالی هم نمیتونیم بخوریم.
🔴طرف میگه یه فیلم پـورن تو شهرشون پخش شده و یک جمله تو اون فیلم باعث شده فروششون تقریبا صفر بشه و این نشون میده ۹۰ درصد مردم توی هر سنی از این فیلما نگاه میکنن.
🔴 پانج، بچه میمونی که چند وقت پیش بخاطر تنهایی و طرد شدنش از گروه میمونا وایرال شده بود الان بزرگ شده و خودش از ی بچه میمونی که مادرشو از دست داده مراقبت میکنه :
❤558🥰41💔10😢6👏4🖕1
Showing the 12 most recent of 3,137 posts we hold for @IrJaavan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @IrJaavan as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
47 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
بد سیتی | CITY BAD @CITY_BAD · 103,653 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
زن زندگی آزادی @ZanZndegiAzadi · 26,009 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
خاکستری. @immortal_me · 35,388 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
خبر مملکت @KhbarMamlekat · 57,308 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
𝗕𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗺𝗹𝘆 @acalchnll · 30,062 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
شومبولیسم...! @ShomboIis · 62,187 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 August 2026
توییت طور | Twite tor @Twitetorx · 18,598 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 3 October 2026
Efsha Bad Tv - افشا بد تیوی @Efsha_Bad_Tv · 22,005 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 September 2026
وطنی استار @vatani_star · 28,879 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 September 2026
کانالِ کولر ...! @ColerChannel · 23,900 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 September 2026
XSherTV @Radio_Koscher · 97,737 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
#Plus @plusia · 30,160 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 9 September 2026
[ توییتر ] @Twiter · 18,934 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 October 2026
شیتینگ! @eatingshitt · 95,792 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 September 2026
افشا نیوز @AfshaUs · 23,312 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 17 September 2026
صیاسفید. @ciyacefid · 60,787 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
Mental | اخبار فوری @mental_news · 108,436 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
ژن خوب @zhenekhoub · 66,981 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
ابسولوت @abs_olut · 45,118 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Fut Dark | فوت دارک @DarkFotBalli · 52,002 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
⌟ ایلومیناتی⌜ @iluminatim · 29,275 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
حاشیه @hashieh · 229,723 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
اِفراطی بی مَنطِق @Efratibimantegh · 25,931 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
Akhbarfori | اخبار فوری @akkhbarfori · 62,998 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 46 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اخبار جنگ i'm Sad” (@IrJaavan), 227,376 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IrJaavan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.