برای سلامتی و حاجت روایی بخونیم هر کی خوند ری اکشن قلب قرمز بزنه🌻

Channel
- حال نامعلوم
@hale_namaloum
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,527subscribers
-226 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001424455604 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hale_namaloum |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hale_namaloum |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 10,527 | -15 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 10,542 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 10,548 | -5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 10,553 | -21 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 10,574 | -10 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 10,584 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:26 | 10,591 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:24 | 10,598 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 10,601 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 10,607 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 10,615 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 10,617 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 10,620 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 10,627 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 10,635 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 10,640 | -9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 10,649 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 10,659 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 10,665 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 10,671 | first reading |
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.50%
- avg views ÷ 10,527 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 579
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (24 June 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,893 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 20:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
و ما با صبری که اجبار بود، روزگار گذراندیم!
🤗 وقتی که که فکر میکنی همه قاب خوشگلا برای آیفونه تااینکه بااین چنل آشنا میشی: @shop
یه بزرگی میگفت : کارای آدما جای دوری نمیره، توی همین دنیا به خودشون برمیگرده
هنوز فرصت نکرده ام زندگی کنم تا الان هر چه بود دوام آوردن بود
مهربانی من دعوت نامه ای برای سوء استفاده ی تو نیست
حالا اگر مرا غمگین میبینی، برای چیزهایی نیست که از من گرفته اند، این بار غمم از چیزیست که برایم باقی گذاشتند. من این جان را میخواهم چکار؟ مثل آن موجودی که تماما سوخته، مثل استخوان های خورد شده ای که ترمیم نخواهد شد. قلبم بزند که چه؟ - غزل آهویی
دیگه نمیخوام مشکلاتم تموم شن، کاش خودم تموم میشدم
از تموم رسیدنا ما فقط دستمون به غمای دنیا رسید
در آرزوی جایی آنقدر دور، که ندانم در جهان چه میگذرد ...
مهربونم، ساده ام، رو راستم؛ مقابلم اما لشکری از آدم های با سیاست و دو رو ایستادن.
دیدن یه حیوون گرسنه قلبم رو میخراشه، یا یه آدم مسن ضعیف، یا یه بچه که داره گریه میکنه، دنیا برای آدمی مثل من زیادی سنگینه؛ کسی که قلبش رو بین دو تا دستاش گرفته و بین مردم راه میره ...
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @hale_namaloum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@hale_namaloum named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@girin · 32,810
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
@colorful_dreamsZ · 39,814
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 August 2026
@Texturk · 28,404
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
@Siyasatejazb · 30,674
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
@Srylove · 245,144
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
@immortal_me · 36,568
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
@TxTBiwo · 37,232
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
@ForStory · 24,176
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
@Blue_coldroom · 28,056
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 September 2026
@OfficialCherkNevis · 24,015
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
@asatedmjazm · 67,878
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 August 2026
@EvanBand · 45,171
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
@Heroin_Bioo · 32,203
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
@StoryeKhas · 99,519
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026
@peaceradio1 · 22,929
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
@rezasadeghi_official · 32,193
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“- حال نامعلوم” (@hale_namaloum), 10,527 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hale_namaloum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.