سیکتیر.

Channel
تراپیست
@Rlighthere
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
140,943subscribers
+6,076 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001845982857 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Rlighthere |
| Description | شرابی مثل رنگ لبات. 150k.....🏊.....140k تبلیغات: https://t.me/tbtherapist/3 ناشناس: http://t.me/HidenChat_Bot?start=297880955 چنل دوم: @themaybewe |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Rlighthere |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 140,943 | +365 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 140,578 | +407 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 140,171 | +283 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 139,888 | +298 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:02 | 139,590 | +747 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:00 | 138,843 | +640 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 138,203 | +242 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:34 | 137,961 | +291 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 137,670 | +145 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 137,525 | +21 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 137,504 | +98 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 137,406 | -93 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 137,499 | +105 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 137,394 | -78 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 137,472 | +110 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 137,362 | +285 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 137,077 | +98 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 136,979 | +180 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 136,799 | +104 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 136,695 | first reading |
Engagement
327 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 17.5%
- avg views ÷ 140,943 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 24,700
- 186 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 187
- of 327 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 327 (28 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,596,696 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 00:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 510
- Videos
- 70
- Links
- 503
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
“اعصاب” چیز خوبیه ولی متاسفانه من ندارم.
قلبم بعد شنیدن اون حرف:
my type:🎀
خیلیاتون پرسیدین ویدیو مسیجامو از کجا برمیدارم، جویین شید زود پاکش میکنم.
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
نون و پنیر و انبه ریدم تو صبح شنبه.
امروز 26 September، روز جهانیِ سینگلهاست.
؛تراپیست
Voice message, posted without a caption
گپ چت 🎀 https://t.me/+D9LNrfhUFQM1NGJk
Showing the 12 most recent of 327 posts we hold for @Rlighthere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Rlighthere edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 23 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 23 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
وضعیت؟
- کنکور دارم16%
- ندارم85%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 327 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@amirhoseiynghiasi · 19,2857 postsPony.💤
@pony_Zz · 1042 postsBlue🪼
@Blue0_086 · 291 post𝕭𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖓𝖌
@Boring666u · 151 post. 𝖢𝖺𝗅𝗅𝗈𝗎𝗌 -
@Calloxusx · 9171 postBleedvoice
@Crwzi · 2141 post-𝐸🪼
@Elina_0_core · 931 post𝑳𝒐𝒔𝒕 𝒊𝒏 𝑫𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎𝒔💤
@Ellililin720 · 8611 post•𝑨𝒍𝒃𝒐𝒓•
@FerniElii · 2431 postHome
@HillerHill · 8221 post..KRTX..
@KRTX123 · 2401 post𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧
@Maximuss193 · 1241 post͛ 𝟳𝟲𝟬𝟬¸
@NettSouls · 211 post𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗩𝗔𝗡𝗘
@Parvanehasli · 136,3371 post𝑄𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎
@Quere00ncia · 2111 postقِـشا؏
@Sahebdelllll · 731 post𝗧𝗥𝟯𝗫 𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗗🦖
@TR3X_LAND · 2341 postEdge of Dreams
@afroxdit · 4401 post-𝘔𝘦^᪲
@asalo021 · 2051 postdream of a star🎄
@blueestarrrrer · 4511 postدُژَم🩶
@dozham_58 · 821 post𝘍𝘙𝘌𝘌𝘋𝘖𝘔🪽
@edittcouples · 1121 postM,
@fafaerio · 1381 postG
@fiendgu · 791 post𝐢ç 𝐡𝐮𝐳𝐮𝐫
@goodgirlyyes · 2371 postجوانه زخمی🖤🥀
@javanehzakhmi · 351 postla flame
@laflaaaa · 42,5641 postL-D
@liyana_1 · 871 postwho?
@meandwho5 · 6,3891 postNemo🤍
@mee_youuuuu · 1221 postMe<3
@meitarkati · 1701 postMy playlist
@momo878i · 1201 postₛₐₙ Fᵣₐₙcᵢₛcₒ Gₒ
@sanfransisgo · 3051 postNefelibata
@xlxpp18 · 5121 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@amirhoseiynghiasi · 19,2852 postsSIDE B
@sideBx · 8,8762 posts𝗖𝗵𝘂𝗺 𝗕𝘂𝗰𝗸𝗲𝘁 🪣
@Gangstersdonotcry · 192,6331 postمروارید
@Morvarid_siahi · 4,2451 post𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗩𝗔𝗡𝗘
@Parvanehasli · 136,3371 post10 April
@aprrill10 · 2,7591 postWE D!E IN SILENCE
@idiewith · 173,4731 postEclipse
@myunsaidz · 5,1491 postmorph
@thatsmorph · 1,0281 post𝖬𝖺𝗒𝖻𝖾 𝖶𝖾
@themaybewe · 11,0831 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@prettybrokenangle · 33,2443 postsArven
@Arvennm · 991 postDie with me
@Diewithme09 · 19,9541 post𝗖𝗵𝘂𝗺 𝗕𝘂𝗰𝗸𝗲𝘁 🪣
@Gangstersdonotcry · 192,6331 postWE D!E IN SILENCE
@idiewith · 173,4731 postClassical Music
@music · 92,4451 postEclipse
@myunsaidz · 5,1491 postmorph
@thatsmorph · 1,0281 post𝖬𝖺𝗒𝖻𝖾 𝖶𝖾
@themaybewe · 11,0831 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Rlighthere named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 21 September 2026 – 21 September 2026
named in 1 post, 14 September 2026 – 14 September 2026
named in 1 post, 12 September 2026 – 12 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@mexxyoux · 95,822#1
@WryVur · 138,803#2
@idiewith · 173,473#3
@xbeus · 19,163#4
@yourperfuumm · 59,678#5
@December0_3 · 30,271#6
@letskills · 82,351#7
@istarbeat · 23,793#8
@iDeathBirth · 4#9
@coucoa · 113,061#10
@Amyraly · 41#11
@Lyricsteach · 40,927#12
@samepov · 48,272#13
@iciou · 274,685#14
@spiiderclown · 100,590#15
@minemetanoia · 86,454#16
@sigwhar · 4,560#17
@Xunsent · 110,041#18
@irobah · 22,920#19
@hawwne · 10,613#20
@boobspider · 18,961#21
@pinkCiggar · 31,423#22
@beautydepp · 7,163#23
@titlimahiw · 11,704#24
@isoolatedw · 5,239#25
@royemaaah · 17,982#26
@RegaPlus · 1,474,377#27
@texspoweris · 3,852#28
@phtneh · 9,324#29
@ZAPASYOUNG · 36,131#30
@rebccaghaderi · 275,127#31
@my_soul_21g · 64,229#32
@urstochange · 4,921#33
@TheGamepc · 144#34
@GaArea · 51,827#35
@iMTProto · 7,597,568#36
@injaneb_Bitab · 5,408#37
@MasteMaqmom · 26,236#38
@baacheeasli · 44,971#39
@ndanqbb · 59,356#40
@darkproxy · 4,702,475#41
@shadesofthemoon · 1,609#42
@talllllllllllk · 73,107#43
@pedaretdiana · 49,378#44
@YouBgo · 100,135#45
@Beustaa · 18,590#46
@yegansdaily · 13,854#47
@skarlet_pab · 2,510#48
@SaeidBaratpour · 90,523#49
@initiatur · 191,944#50
@Codeain · 339,457#51
@sogoandfuckyourlove · 546,077#52
@Sickliy · 30,933#53
@parcasplaylist · 15,502#54
@crayingroom · 290,469#55
@MakeYourCharacter · 1,296#56
@iRoProxy · 7,909,421#57
@meandwho5 · 6,389#58
@meowmbti · 46,829#59
@baraop8 · 3,091#60
@explorextelegram · 79,706#61
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@iboseh · 48,300
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 27 August 2026
@yourperfuumm · 59,678
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 22 August 2026
@Sweetsoulw · 29,344
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 8 September 2026
@minemetanoia · 86,454
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 25 August 2026
@Hnule · 100,613
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 19 August 2026
@xFades · 127,263
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 15 August 2026
@lBastarrds · 26,733
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 September 2026
@pinkCiggar · 31,423
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
@typingnotes · 70,773
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 August 2026
@iLoveisOurs · 97,292
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
@MasteMaqmom · 26,236
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 September 2026
@Sickliy · 30,933
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 5 September 2026
@Senariochanell · 157
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 August 2026
@SaeidBaratpour · 90,523
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 August 2026
@x0505xi · 109,995
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@dismaying · 137,213
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
@Hug_org · 32,135
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 4 September 2026
@im403error · 41,607
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 August 2026
@Xunsent · 110,041
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 14 August 2026
@Hupelless · 84,626
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 18 August 2026
@MIIIMSN · 166,467
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
@afson_tel · 40,447
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 26 August 2026
@havaliafkaram · 21,291
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 24 September 2026
@ppaaranoya · 78,045
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 109 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تراپیست” (@Rlighthere), 140,943 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rlighthere.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.