Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Sleepy Classes IAS

@SleepyClasses

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

82,283subscribers

-87 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001122884106
TypeChannel
Username@SleepyClasses
DescriptionMaking Regular Videos. For UPSC. So that you don't have to go to coaching classes at all. For Free.
Created31 August 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SleepyClasses

Growth

82,28382,37082,326.57 August 2026 — 82,370 subscribers8 August 2026 — 82,349 subscribers10 August 2026 — 82,312 subscribers11 August 2026 — 82,292 subscribers12 August 2026 — 82,283 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 4 days, net -87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 82,270–82,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 02:4382,283-9
11 Aug 2026, 03:4882,292-20
10 Aug 2026, 02:4182,312-37
8 Aug 2026, 23:1082,349-21
7 Aug 2026, 23:3482,370first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.24%
avg views ÷ 82,283 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,840
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.189%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held64 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total117,792
Reactions total223
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,730
Videos
18
Links
6,410

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

223 reactions across 64 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11350.7%
8839.5%
🔥188.07%
🤯41.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC352 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

On a lighter note 😹 UPSC after Prelims 2026 😃😃 https://youtube.com/shorts/z_7tmsxRX4g?si=nDy-IelCKk09NGYw

2

12 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,110 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

All big changes present great opportunities

🤯4

12 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC≈1,370 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @SleepySociology

Bureaucracy mein rules aur goals ki tension par yeh ek video banaya hai ... isse dekh kar batao ki kya bureaucrats rules par itna focus karte hain ki real goal bhool jaate hain, ya rules aur results ke beech balance banana hi impossible hai? https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6UYRMQ3z88U

👍2

12 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈1,570 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

How can a tribunal be impartial if it depends on the very government ministry it is supposed to rule against? ​After the Supreme Court struck down this fundamental conflict of interest, the entire system is being overhauled to protect the separation of powers. ​Here is what the Tribunals Reforms Bill, 2026 changes: ​𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗥𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺: The Tribunals Reforms Bill, 2026 responds to the Supreme Court's 2025 judgment (

👍1

12 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC≈1,610 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

​𝗥𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗙𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: The Periodic Labour Force Survey places female labor force participation at 40%, with potential to add up to $1.4 trillion to India's GDP if raised to 54%. ​𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗦𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀: Although women make up over 56% of certified candidates under PMKVY 4.0, they represent small fractions in core technical trades like electricians (4.8%), welding (3.5%), and mechanics (2.7%). ​𝗧𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗱

1👍1

12 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC≈1,360 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

How does the Tribunals Reforms Bill (2026) primarily end the reliance of tribunals on parent ministries?

  1. ​By placing them under Supreme Court control10%
  2. ​By creating the National Tribunals Commission69%
  3. ​By mandating 5-year tenures for all members16%
  4. ​By requiring direct CAG financial audits5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2👍1

12 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC≈1,500 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

To add $1.4 trillion to India's GDP, female labor force participation needs to rise from 40% to

  1. 44%12%
  2. 54%55%
  3. 64%25%
  4. 74%8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥4👍1

12 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC≈1,480 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Day 21 Sleepy CSAT PYQ Series Today, we will be looking at an LR Q. We alternate between RC, LR and Quant PYQs in this series. Try to solve it. Solutions will be provided later today.

2👍1

11 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC≈1,840 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @SleepySociology

And… 5 trillion dollars economy target pushed to 2029-30 👏👏🥹🥹 I sincerely feel we could have done (or not done) 3 things to be doing a lot better - demonetisation (absolutely no no) - more govt recruitment (absolutely yes yes) - corruption (fast track courts and rapid justice and law enforcement) But we did what we did and here we are again 👏👏 https://youtube.com/shorts/XvA1-mfODYk?si=d5Erb7SaN0GJxfmh

👍54

11 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC≈2,100 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Solution to Today's CSAT PYQ We can see the function is same on both sides of the inequality for both statements. The actual way to solve this would be to create a function f(t) and then find it's differential f'(t) and then according to that we can tell if the function is decreasing or increasing in the range of 1/3 to 2. But that would make it a very lengthy solution Also most of us won't remember the quotient

👍2

11 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC≈2,250 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Is Handloom India's Next Luxury Revolution or a Fading Legacy? ​𝗛𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 & 𝗘𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗰 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲: Handloom is a pillar of India's manufacturing history, rural employment, and cultural identity, supporting over 35 lakh workers nearly 70% women) and producing about 15% of the country's cloth. ​𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘀: Diminishing returns, fragmented markets, and disappearing traditional knowledge threaten the sector's future,

👍21

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @SleepyClasses. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@SleepyClasses edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 16 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz202 voters

How does the Tribunals Reforms Bill (2026) primarily end the reliance of tribunals on parent ministries?

  1. ​By placing them under Supreme Court control10%
  2. ​By creating the National Tribunals Commission69%
  3. ​By mandating 5-year tenures for all members16%
  4. ​By requiring direct CAG financial audits5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz276 voters

To add $1.4 trillion to India's GDP, female labor force participation needs to rise from 40% to

  1. 44%12%
  2. 54%55%
  3. 64%25%
  4. 74%8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTCAnonymous Quiz374 voters

Which landmark Constitution Bench judgment upheld the constitutional validity of the death penalty in India, ruling that it does not violate Articles 14, 19, and 21, but restricted its application strictly to the "rarest of rare" cases?

  1. Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab (1983)17%
  2. Mithu v. State of Punjab (1983)9%
  3. Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980)48%
  4. Shatrughan Chouhan v. Union of India (2014)26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz175 voters

Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 1 and 2 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

  1. 1 only8%
  2. 1 and 2 only46%
  3. 2 and 3 only17%
  4. 1, 2 and 330%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz331 voters

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. 1 only5%
  2. 2 only34%
  3. Both 1 and 259%
  4. Neither 1 nor 22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz242 voters

Asiatic lions have recently expanded massively into 11 human populated districts. How are these apex predators successfully surviving outside traditional forest boundaries?

  1. By relocating local villages to create new, human-free forests.15%
  2. Through local farmer goodwill and modifying daily hazards like wells and trains.41%
  3. By building extensive wildlife fences to separate the lions from towns.31%
  4. By artificially feeding the lions so they don't hunt local livestock.14%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 278,536 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Sudarshan Gurjar Unacademy
@Sudarshan_Unacademy · 305,803
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 10 August 2026
UPSCPrep.com
@UPSCprepIAS · 200,556
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
Sunya IAS Short Notes
@sunyanotes50 · 193,203
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
StudyIQ Education
@Studyiqeducation · 365,683
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Geography Mapping
@upsc_geography_mapping_optionals · 151,441
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Mrunal's Official Channel: General Studies, Current Affairs, Economy for UPSC
@mrunalorg · 212,748
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
OnlyIAS Nothing Else
@onlyiasnothingelse · 210,071
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
InsightsIAS (official) Guidance - Tips for Success
@insightsIAStips · 191,828
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
Clarity for UPSC by Dr.Shivin (AIR - 297)
@theanonymousupscaspirant · 253,113
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Vajiram and Ravi Official Channel
@vajiramandraviofficial · 282,181
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
IAS PCS Pathshala
@iaspcspathshala · 189,941
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
Vision IAS (Official)
@VisionIAS_UPSC · 400,408
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
PW UPSC Wallah
@pw_upsc · 183,220
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sleepy Classes IAS” (@SleepyClasses), 82,283 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SleepyClasses.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.