https://youtube.com/shorts/_9Jv8YnyQ60?si=LV66elP1Ap2JT74Q
👍3❤1

Channel
@IASbabaOfficialAccount
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
76,479subscribers
-1,319 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001109256379 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IASbabaOfficialAccount |
| Description | Important Updates, UPSC Preparation Tips, New Initiatives, and IASbaba Materials at one place |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IASbabaOfficialAccount |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 76,479 | -90 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 76,569 | -26 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 76,595 | -22 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:42 | 76,617 | -80 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 76,697 | -75 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 76,772 | -117 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 76,889 | -62 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 76,951 | -36 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:43 | 76,987 | -25 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 77,012 | -24 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 77,036 | -25 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 77,061 | -39 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 77,100 | -22 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 77,122 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 77,131 | -26 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 77,157 | -29 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 77,186 | -31 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 77,217 | -62 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 77,279 | -39 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 77,318 | first reading |
83 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 83 (16 July 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 38,740 |
| Reactions total | 75 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 01:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
261 reactions across 58 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 230 | 88.1% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 4.21% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 3.07% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 3.07% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 1.15% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.383% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtube.com/shorts/_9Jv8YnyQ60?si=LV66elP1Ap2JT74Q
👍3❤1
Link For Entrance Test Registration - https://courses.iasbaba.com/open_test/00727b4d-705d-11f1-8c5c-d00296ebd97a
🚨 Admissions Open | GURUKUL ADVANCED 2027 for Veterans 🚨 Built on the timeless Guru–Shishya Parampara, GURUKUL ADVANCED is a rigorous, mentorship-driven programme designed for serious UPSC aspirants. ✨ Key Highlights 🎯 Direct Mentorship by Mohan Sir 👥 Personalized 1:1 Mentorship by experienced mentors 📝 Integrated Prelims & Mains Test Series (GS + CSAT) 📊 Daily Accountability, Performance Tracking & SWOT Analysis …
❤2
Link for Registration- ILP Aarambh - https://courses.iasbaba.com/enrol/ilp-2027 ILP Shikar - https://courses.iasbaba.com/enrol/ilp-shikar-2027
Why is ILP 2027 the most comprehensive UPSC self-preparation programme ever? Discover a preparation ecosystem that's structured, student-friendly, and built to keep you consistent from Day 1 to the exam. ILP 2027 is designed as a complete 365-day self-study programme with guided preparation and mentorship. Program Starts 21st September 🎁 Enroll now and unlock the best launch offers available!
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤14🙏2
🎯 IASbaba Gurukul Foundation Scholarship Test 2027 Your UPSC journey deserves the right foundation! If you are beginning your UPSC preparation and looking for the right guidance, structured preparation, expert mentorship and a proven learning ecosystem, this is your opportunity to start with IASbaba’s Gurukul Foundation Course. 🏆 Scholarships up to 100% for the Top 40 Rankers! Rank 1–10: 100% Scholarship Rank 11–…
❤11
Baba’s Gurukul Study Hub An Ideal Study Environment for Serious Aspirants Key Features: ✅️ 1:1 Personalised Mentorship with mentors having interview experience ✅️Monthly 1:1 Guidance Sessions with Mohan Sir ✅️Answer Evaluation– Pick any source ✅️Tailor-Made Study Schedule according to students’ needs ✅️Good Library with Parking Facility & AC ✅️Limited to 30 Students for a focused learning environment Fee ₹3,000 …
❤1
IASbaba GS 4 Mains Hit Ratio Analysis | UPSC Mains 2026 Ethics is not a tricky paper—it is an applied paper, where the ability to connect ethical concepts with real-life situations and contemporary issues makes all the difference. With an ever-evolving nature, GS 4 demands continuous practice and exposure to diverse, application-oriented questions. The questions framed in the IASbaba Mains Test Series have success…
❤4🔥4
IASbaba GS 3 Mains Hit Ratio Analysis | UPSC Mains 2026 12 questions from the IASbaba Mains Test Series reflected in the UPSC GS 3 Mains Paper, highlighting the relevance and examination-oriented nature of our test series. GS 3 is one of the most diverse and challenging papers to score in, where a strong understanding of syllabus keywords, recurring themes and evolving UPSC trends plays a crucial role. With this a…
❤3
IASbaba GS 2 Mains Hit Ratio Analysis | UPSC Mains 2026 13 questions from the IASbaba GS 2 Mains Test Series closely matched the themes and demands of the actual UPSC GS 2 Mains Paper. This reflects the rigour, research and thought that goes into framing every question, with a sharp focus on understanding UPSC trends, evolving themes and the changing nature of the examination. The objective is not prediction, but …
❤2
IASbaba GS1 Mains Hit Ratio Analysis 2026 🎯 In the UPSC Mains 2026 General Studies Paper 1, IASbaba’s Sankalp Mains Test Series 2026 demonstrated extraordinary hit precision, with 12 questions reflected directly from the test series and daily evaluation framework.
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @IASbabaOfficialAccount. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which one of the following rivers is popularly referred to as the “River of Blood” in India?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
With reference to Rotenone, which one of the following statements is correct?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How Was GS - 4 Ethics Paper
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How Was GS 3 - UPSC Mains 2026
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How Was UPSC Mains 2026 - GS 2
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How Was GS Paper 1 UPSC Mains 2026
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 20 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 64 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IASbaba (Official) Telegram Channel” (@IASbabaOfficialAccount), 76,479 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IASbabaOfficialAccount.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.