https://www.upsc.gov.in/examinations/previous-question-papers Civil Services (Main) Examination, 2026 Official papers updated including All Optionals✅

Channel
UPSC Ethics Examples & Quotes
@UPSC_Ethics_Example
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,191subscribers
-174 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001597867529 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UPSC_Ethics_Example |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UPSC_Ethics_Example |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 12,191 | -23 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 12,214 | -8 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 12,222 | -7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 12,229 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 12,236 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:02 | 12,240 | -20 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 12,260 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 12,263 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 12,269 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 12,270 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 12,282 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 12,291 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 12,297 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 12,300 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 12,307 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 12,305 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 12,310 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 12,317 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 12,320 | -9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 12,329 | first reading |
Engagement
51 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 51 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
34 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 91.2% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 8.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://youtu.be/NaMmJ5lmCbE?si=grKHnB5c7hsp_PoZ
Anthropology paper 2
Medical Science Paper-I upsc_mains_2026 Telegram: @medical_scie
Geography paper 2
File, posted without a caption
Paper 2 Maths optional CSM 26
File, posted without a caption
Anthropology Paper 2
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
PSIR Paper 2
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @UPSC_Ethics_Example. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@upsc_prelims_mcqs · 36,185
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
@KBsMappingOfficial · 40,575
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
@KBsIAS · 46,239
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
@Adityatiwarisir_upscwallah · 22,653
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 20 September 2026
@tathastubyTanuJain · 44,637
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 August 2026
@upsc_mains_model_answer · 88,979
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
@jayantparikshit · 22,351
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 September 2026
@psir_optional_Sunyaias · 20,114
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
@UPSC_irmindmaps_di_mains_prelims · 46,117
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
@the_hindu_newspaper_pdf_hindu_lh · 30,070
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 7 September 2026
@UPSC_Environment_Ecology_Notes · 36,462
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
@Indian_Express_CSETopper · 31,606
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 5 September 2026
@forestryopt · 32,728
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 September 2026
@Upsc_notessss · 26,044
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 September 2026
@Convert_IAS · 135,553
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
@UPSC_Ethics_examples_quotes · 20,497
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 September 2026
@upsc_polity_history_optionals · 59,433
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
@sociology_sunyaias · 25,562
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
@hinduhighlights · 134,377
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
@SOMPGUIDANCE · 93,086
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
@internal_security_upsc_MAINS · 36,287
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
@upsc_facts · 33,846
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 3 September 2026
@Optional_toppers_notes · 43,560
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
@Upsc_4_economy · 49,388
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UPSC Ethics Examples & Quotes” (@UPSC_Ethics_Example), 12,191 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UPSC_Ethics_Example.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.