Channel
@rainahaina05
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,939subscribers
+32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003239015030 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rainahaina05 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rainahaina05 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 2,939 | +30 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 2,909 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 2,907 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 2,907 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,123 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
20 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 60.0% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 35.0% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Which landmark legal case is widely credited with leading to the abolition of the jury trial system in India?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Beginners / First attempt vaalo aajao live pe https://www.youtube.com/live/vtj_k1Q6K4Q?si=hNoOtPOyVRTBK0wm
it is better for a hundred guilty persons to escape than for one innocent person to be condemned and punished. Do you agree with this Legal Canon ? I personally dont... But I came across this assertion by Supreme Court justices while I was preparing content for my Current Affairs Session today and reading about this Supreme Court judgment where it set aside the conviction and death sentence of Abdul Hameed, an accu…
❤2
Shradha Mam has guided students to become rank holders via her excellent geography lectures She is live on YT right now , providing her inputs on how to balance GS OPTIONAL and Current Affairs Must watch https://www.youtube.com/live/UiNt-tMKHiA?si=6z1Zg-9my8KXsenq
Landmark Judgments Series L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997): Judicial Review is Basic Structure: The review powers of High Courts (Articles 226/227) and the Supreme Court (Article 32) are inalienable features of the Constitution. Exclusion Clauses Struck Down: The Court invalidated Clause 2(d) of Art. 323A and Clause 3(d) of Art. 323B (inserted by the 42nd Amendment, 1976), which unconstitutionally strip…
Landmark Judgments Series The Correct Answer Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2022) Key Highlights Bail Act Directive: Directed the Union Government to enact a standalone "Bail Act" (akin to the UK Bail Act, 1976) to standardize bail adjudication. Offense Categorization: Classified offenses into 4 categories (A, B, C, D) based on sentence severity and inclusion in Special Acts (e.g., PMLA, UAPA). Arrest Guidelin…
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's ruling in the L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997) case: 1) It declared the power of judicial review vested in High Courts under Articles 226 and 227 as part of the basic structure of the Constitution. 2) It ruled that appeals against the orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) must lie directly to the Supreme Court to ensure speedy …
Day 21 of 40 Landmark Judgments Series The answer is Laxmibai Chandaragi B. v. State of Karnataka (2021) The Right to Choose a Partner Case Laxmibai Chandaragi, an adult from Karnataka, travelled to Uttar Pradesh to marry Santosh Singh Yadav. Her father filed a "missing person" FIR on October 14, 2020. Despite her sending her marriage certificate to the Investigating Officer (IO) and confirming her safety over …
❤2
Will start posting daily answer writing questions starting tomorrow evening
👍5
Okay Many of you showed interest This is the schedule i shared with my mentorship students You guys can follow
👍4🙏1
File, posted without a caption
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rainahaina05. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which landmark legal case is widely credited with leading to the abolition of the jury trial system in India?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How Many of you will Cover Ethics, Integrity and Aptitude this month if i drop a day wise schedule and Daily Practice Questions here ?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
In which landmark judgment did the Supreme Court issue comprehensive guidelines on arrest and bail, urging the Government of India to enact a separate "Bail Act" to streamline the process and reduce the massive population of undertrial prisoners?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 611,988 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ayush Raina UPSC (Mains Polity IR )” (@rainahaina05), 2,939 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rainahaina05.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.