"You Dream We Mentor"
SOMP - The Civil Services Exam Institute which commenced the concept of Mentorship.
For admission contact at @SOMP_ENQUIRIES or
Contact no : 8837755342/ 6386039124
Website SOMP.in
YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/@SOMPIAS
Created
23 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +171. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 92,527–93,034 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 08:08
92,833
-101
11 Aug 2026, 05:57
92,934
-41
10 Aug 2026, 08:36
92,975
+169
9 Aug 2026, 05:52
92,806
+221
8 Aug 2026, 05:17
92,585
-53
7 Aug 2026, 06:25
92,638
-24
6 Aug 2026, 09:04
92,662
first reading
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.47%
avg views ÷ 92,833 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,300
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.141%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
47 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
98,790
Reactions total
112
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,530
Videos
≈107
Links
≈2,690
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
98 reactions across 29 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
40
40.8%
👍
21
21.4%
🙏
10
10.2%
🔥
9
9.18%
👏
8
8.16%
✍
7
7.14%
💯
2
2.04%
🤗
1
1.02%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
For those who are appearing in the Mains-26: A lot of candidates have fallen ill because of ongoing viral fever.
If you are ill then don't take much tension as many are going through the same.
Just recover fast and get ready for the upcoming Mains.
Ethics: The Subject That Hides Your Weakness
In every other subject you know where you stand. Three chapters pending, one revision left — you can count it on your fingers.
Ethics doesn't work like that. You can feel fully prepared and still go blank in the exam, or end up with mediocre marks.
Three places where it breaks:
Course familiarity ≠ Exam readiness
For example, say, Integrity — notes ready, definition ready…
Classic power vs accountability and commercial interest vs stakeholder responsibility debate — A contemporary example you should definitely cite in Ethics answers.
The SOMP Ethics 2027 book has been built around one simple objective — it should be the ONLY BOOK you need to study for Ethics for Mains 2027.
Every topic is explained with conceptual depth, while giving you the value addition needed to write better answers — stories, contemporary debates, real examples, PYQs, case-study insights and illustrations.
Check out the first chapter: Ethics and Human Interface
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @SOMPGUIDANCE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 11,080 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Sunya IAS Short Notes @sunyanotes50 · 193,203 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Mrunal's Official Channel: General Studies, Current Affairs, Economy for UPSC @mrunalorg · 212,748 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
UPSC CSE Topper by Vikas Dhayal @csetopper · 175,417 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
IAS PCS Pathshala @iaspcspathshala · 189,941 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
UPSC Prelims Mains Notes @UPSC_Prelims_Mains_Notes · 157,168 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
OnlyIAS Nothing Else @onlyiasnothingelse · 210,071 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
UPSC PREVIOUS YEARS QUESTION @upsc_previous_year_question · 196,999 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
PW UPSC Wallah @pw_upsc · 183,220 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
Vision IAS (Official) @VisionIAS_UPSC · 400,408 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
Geography Mapping @upsc_geography_mapping_optionals · 151,441 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Clarity for UPSC by Dr.Shivin (AIR - 297) @theanonymousupscaspirant · 253,113 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Sudarshan Gurjar Unacademy @Sudarshan_Unacademy · 305,803 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 10 August 2026
StudyIQ Education @Studyiqeducation · 365,683 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
UPSC Civil Services Upsc Prelims Mains Exam Current Affairs GS Gk Tricks SSC CGL IAS IFS IPS EPFO PCS UPPCS MPPCS Bihar PCS @cseupscnotes · 152,550 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
UPSCPrep.com @UPSCprepIAS · 200,556 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
InsightsIAS (official) Guidance - Tips for Success @insightsIAStips · 191,828 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
Vajiram and Ravi Official Channel @vajiramandraviofficial · 282,181 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
study for civil services @studyforcivilservices · 292,128 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SOMP(Strategy Oriented Mentorship Program)” (@SOMPGUIDANCE), 92,833 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SOMPGUIDANCE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.