Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مرشحات السادس علمي

Channel

مرشحات السادس علمي

@stad6ma

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,753subscribers

-6,638 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001610368546
TypeChannel
Username@stad6ma
Descriptionقناة لــطُـلاب السادس العلمي ♗- مُلخصات لجميع المَواد. ♗- اخَتبارات شَاملة. ♗- ومُراجعات تحت اشراف ڪَادر مُتخصص. ..........♗♝.......... ♝- رابط القناة @stad6ma ♝- اسَتفساراتڪم @abn_al_najambot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/stad6ma

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 9 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 9 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@stad6ma/67192 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC@stad3ma/7243519 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC1.007.1 hours
@stad3ma/732929 Sept 2026, 03:00 UTC@stad6ma/68053 · this entry10 Sept 2026, 03:00 UTC1.0024 hours
@stad6ma/68097 · this entry7 Oct 2026, 15:32 UTC@stad3ma/733507 Oct 2026, 15:32 UTC1.00under a minute
@stad3ma/7360525 Oct 2026, 16:09 UTC@stad6ma/68300 · this entry25 Oct 2026, 16:09 UTC1.00under a minute
@stad3ma/7365628 Oct 2026, 15:35 UTC@stad6ma/68342 · this entry28 Oct 2026, 15:36 UTC1.0072 seconds
@stad3ma/7366429 Oct 2026, 15:10 UTC@stad6ma/68350 · this entry29 Oct 2026, 15:10 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@stad3ma34 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@stad3ma (25–9)
@stad1ma28 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.98under a minutethis entry (16–12)
@stad0ma23 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.99under a minute@stad0ma (14–9)
@stad66ma17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.98under a minute@stad66ma (11–6)
@lreqed17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@lreqed (14–3)
@ooiq216 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@ooiq2 (13–3)
@stad4ma7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.98under a minutethis entry (6–1)
@stad2ma7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (6–1)
@XQ_256 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 seconds@XQ_25 (4–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 95 of the 95 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 130 comparable posts for this entry, running 9 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 9 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @stad1ma. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 9 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

38,75345,39142,07210 August 2026 — 45,391 subscribers11 August 2026 — 45,340 subscribers12 August 2026 — 45,271 subscribers13 August 2026 — 45,192 subscribers14 August 2026 — 45,229 subscribers16 August 2026 — 45,138 subscribers17 August 2026 — 45,067 subscribers18 August 2026 — 45,020 subscribers19 August 2026 — 45,019 subscribers20 August 2026 — 44,995 subscribers21 August 2026 — 44,955 subscribers23 August 2026 — 44,841 subscribers24 August 2026 — 44,739 subscribers25 August 2026 — 44,678 subscribers27 August 2026 — 44,632 subscribers27 August 2026 — 44,766 subscribers28 August 2026 — 44,714 subscribers29 August 2026 — 44,676 subscribers31 August 2026 — 44,629 subscribers1 September 2026 — 44,665 subscribers2 September 2026 — 44,683 subscribers3 September 2026 — 44,628 subscribers4 September 2026 — 44,507 subscribers7 September 2026 — 44,321 subscribers10 September 2026 — 43,624 subscribers12 September 2026 — 43,100 subscribers14 September 2026 — 42,950 subscribers15 September 2026 — 42,836 subscribers18 September 2026 — 42,658 subscribers29 September 2026 — 40,281 subscribers5 October 2026 — 39,772 subscribers9 October 2026 — 39,399 subscribers13 October 2026 — 39,423 subscribers14 October 2026 — 39,278 subscribers15 October 2026 — 39,235 subscribers16 October 2026 — 39,163 subscribers17 October 2026 — 39,105 subscribers18 October 2026 — 39,240 subscribers19 October 2026 — 39,177 subscribers20 October 2026 — 39,193 subscribers21 October 2026 — 39,148 subscribers23 October 2026 — 39,071 subscribers24 October 2026 — 39,009 subscribers25 October 2026 — 38,980 subscribers26 October 2026 — 38,935 subscribers27 October 2026 — 39,027 subscribers28 October 2026 — 38,964 subscribers29 October 2026 — 38,961 subscribers30 October 2026 — 38,968 subscribers31 October 2026 — 38,955 subscribers1 November 2026 — 39,055 subscribers2 November 2026 — 39,040 subscribers3 November 2026 — 39,035 subscribers4 November 2026 — 38,990 subscribers5 November 2026 — 38,925 subscribers6 November 2026 — 38,877 subscribers7 November 2026 — 38,819 subscribers8 November 2026 — 38,771 subscribers10 November 2026 — 38,753 subscribers10 August 202610 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net -6,638. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,757–46,387 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 10:1838,753-18
8 Nov 2026, 20:5638,771-48
7 Nov 2026, 11:5838,819-58
6 Nov 2026, 13:1838,877-48
5 Nov 2026, 15:5838,925-65
4 Nov 2026, 15:2938,990-45
3 Nov 2026, 12:1639,035-5
2 Nov 2026, 10:5839,040-15
1 Nov 2026, 13:2739,055+100
31 Oct 2026, 12:3738,955-13
30 Oct 2026, 09:4838,968+7
29 Oct 2026, 06:1138,961-3
28 Oct 2026, 05:4938,964-63
27 Oct 2026, 06:2839,027+92
26 Oct 2026, 04:4738,935-45
25 Oct 2026, 02:5638,980-29
24 Oct 2026, 02:3039,009-62
23 Oct 2026, 02:2739,071-77
21 Oct 2026, 23:5639,148-45
20 Oct 2026, 19:5039,193first reading

Engagement

907 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 231 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.90%
avg views ÷ 38,753 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,670
223 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.257%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
223
of 907 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 218 of 223 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held907 (9 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total596,068
Reactions total1,518
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 16:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈13,200
Videos
≈117
Links
≈5,180

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
27s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,670 reactions across 865 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,87268.3%
💯69912.3%
❤‍🔥4067.16%
👍3285.78%
🔥2564.51%
⚡711.25%
💘380.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 872 of the 907 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,670 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 907 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 907 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stad6ma. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 907 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 223 posts held from the last 30 days (4.04%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 14:58 UTC252 viewsread 11 November 2026

هواي يراسلوني عالبوت منين نحجز الاسطورية راسلنا علئ المعرف اعلاه واعتمد عليهن فقط وراح تشوف التفوق والتميز عن الطلاب من اول يوم

Signed ابن النجف

11 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC621 viewsread 11 November 2026

وصلت الملزمه كلش حلوه سوي واهس للقرايه باجر امتحاني واقره بيه🌸🌚

Signed ابن النجف

11 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC864 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

تريد تصير من الاوائل وبسهولة ؟ من هذا اللحظه تكدر تحجز #الملازم_الاسطوريه (الافضل والاقوئ في العراق بتجربة آلاف الطلاب) تعتمد عليهن فقط وتضمن نجاحك بسهوله بدون اي تعب في كل طلب توجد هديه مع قرعة كل جمعة علئ ايباد 🙈 توصيل خلال 24 ساعه ✈️@v9p3v

Signed سارة هيثم 🤎

10 Nov 2026, 19:58 UTC≈2,270 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026

انتهى الاختبار ابطاال 🤍🌚. https://t.me/stad6ma

❤1

Signed نبأ أمين

10 Nov 2026, 19:56 UTC≈2,170 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

ڪَفووووو✨✨ https://t.me/stad6ma

❤2

Signed نبأ أمين

10 Nov 2026, 19:49 UTC≈1,820 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

الاجابة عل التعليقات ✨✨🤍 https://t.me/stad6ma

❤3

Signed نبأ أمين

10 Nov 2026, 19:47 UTC≈1,640 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

بطلة ميلاد محسن ✨ https://t.me/stad6ma

❤2

Signed نبأ أمين

10 Nov 2026, 19:43 UTC≈1,480 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

الاجابة ورقة وقلم على التعليقات ..

❤2

Signed نبأ أمين

10 Nov 2026, 19:37 UTC≈1,630 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤3🔥2

Signed نبأ أمين

10 Nov 2026, 19:34 UTC≈1,870 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

💯4❤1

Signed نبأ أمين

10 Nov 2026, 19:30 UTC≈1,880 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026

يلا نبلش؟

🔥9❤3

Signed نبأ أمين

10 Nov 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,980 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

أبطال خَليڪم مَستعدين أقرو الملخص مادة الرياضيات أختبارڪَم الساعة 10:30 - https://t.me/stad6ma #شارك_المنشور_للجميع

❤1

Signed نبأ أمين

Showing the 12 most recent of 907 posts we hold for @stad6ma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 69 posts on @stad6ma as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
14 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
17 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
39

Polls

The 6 most recent of 505 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Nov 2026, 13:21 UTCAnonymous Quiz191 voters

Q/ How does the verb (be) change in the present tense with the pronoun (I)?

  1. is42%
  2. are20%
  3. was25%
  4. am13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Nov 2026, 13:19 UTCAnonymous Quiz144 voters

Q/ Which of the following time expressions means "منذ" and is used with a specific time period in the Past Simple tense?

  1. Yesterday32%
  2. Ago22%
  3. Last week16%
  4. In 197931%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Nov 2026, 13:17 UTCAnonymous Quiz146 voters

Q/ What is the past form of the verb (study)?

  1. studied50%
  2. studyed33%
  3. studid10%
  4. studys7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Nov 2026, 13:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz140 voters

Q/ True or False: If a verb ends with a (vowel + y), we keep the 'y' and simply add 'ed'?

  1. True66%
  2. False34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Nov 2026, 13:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz123 voters

Q/ How do verbs ending in (consonant + y) change when converted to the past tense?

  1. We keep the 'y' and add 'ed'50%
  2. We drop the 'y' and replace it with 'ied'50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Nov 2026, 13:11 UTCAnonymous Quiz40 voters

Q/ True or False: If a regular verb ends with a silent 'e', we simply add 'd' to the end of the verb to form the past tense?

  1. True60%
  2. False40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 907 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

📚مرشحات ابن كربلاء 📚
@ooiq2 · 100,726
#1
نيمار ابن الانبار
@iraqedu · 4,750,369
#2
منصة ابن بابل
@iraqed4 · 3,201,482
#3
شبكة المساعد التعليمية | IRAQEDU
@SadsHelp · 23,326
#4
شبكة ملازمنا
@mlazemna · 1,092,287
#5
ابن الدورة
@Edu211 · 678,491
#6
نيمار ابن الانبار iraqedu
@v999v · 1,565,942
#7
شبكة نيوتن التعليمية
@Newton1998 · 370,497
#8
ابن الدورة
@edu2iq · 1,170,133
#9
مرشحات ابن تلعفر
@adb_300 · 58,722
#10
المنقذ في الأنكليزي || أ.محمد العبيدي
@dr_English1 · 293,238
#11
منصة أينشتاين للتعليم
@iraqdeu1 · 284,447
#12
سادسيون ✨
@ZTMMS · 109,461
#13
قناة الهيتي للتميز🩺
@xd6xd6 · 157,197
#14
احمد اللامي
@eduuiq · 95,661
#15
الاستاذ حيدر وليد
@haiderwaleed · 418,972
#16
سالم ال منصور
@Salimalmansour98bio · 239,538
#17
تسلا للتعليم | Tesla
@TeslaAws · 303,134
#18
مكسرات الوزاري
@o6o6o7 · 107,348
#19
أ. مصطفى النعيمي . فيزياء
@drmustafaphyscis · 42,197
#20
English for 6th💯✨.
@UV98UV · 1,999
#21
أ.حيدر عبدالائمه
@hayderabdamaa11 · 283,691
#22
شبكة السوادس | AL-SWADES
@EZZZ22ZZ · 57,739
#23
الأستاذ مؤيد سليم الزيدي
@Muaid92 · 345,573
#24
رابط
@ss_adds · 140
#25
مسيرة السادس
@t25_team · 36,125
#26
اخبار وزارة التربيه | وزاره التعليم
@O2_E3 · 140,061
#27
نجفيون(njafeon)
@njafeoo_n · 265,818
#28
الاستاذ علي الهاشمي 𖧾
@alialhashimi511 · 84,298
#29
الاستاذ محمد قاسم
@messo12 · 503,250
#30
دليل الثقة
@v3p3v · 4,471
#31
توفانا
@Tofaana · 15,985
#32
الاستاذ هارون احمد
@hnam00 · 31,238
#33
المساعد في السادس الاعدادي
@SadsNote · 62,573
#34
ابن الموصل
@IRAQEDU19 · 103,194
#35
نصائح دراسية 💚.
@V1E1V · 10,765
#36
مجرة دراستي ⚡️
@drsttr · 97,280
#37
محمد ابن بغداد
@M777BB · 110,908
#38
الاستاذة نور باجلان🇮🇶
@misnoor100 · 29,998
#39
مجرة السادس
@EE3VE · 22,531
#40
بوابة السادس
@yo_six · 19,022
#41
التربية و التعليم || نيمار ابن الانبار
@iraq_edu · 566,987 (as read 28 August 2026)
#42
برلين للتعليم
@X4DDD · 199,879
#43
wezary by A.A
@wezaryataa · 58,349
#44
دورة الادب المجانية (قاسم كريم)
@ss_rrr6 · 15,643
#45
دكان - dukaan
@dkan313 · 8,696
#46
سينسي
@s5n000 · 32,617
#47
الأستاذ حسن فلاح
@hfbioo · 149,662
#48
موقع عطلة
@XQ_25 · 241,633
#49
ℒ𝒶𝓊𝓇𝒾ℯ𝓇-𝓇ℴ𝓈ℯتو لي
@zjnm21 · 7,712
#50
باركود | خدمات واخبار دراسية
@barcode_600 · 8,542
#51
باتمان السادس ⚕
@P2BBB · 32,876
#52
تَصَــྲْྀاིمَيَ᪸᪰ـــم رَٰيَ᪸᪰ـــــتَــــྲْྀاི
@ck_ep · 14,511
#53
Dr- سادس
@meo_six · 28,403
#54
الاستاذ هاشم الغرباوي
@teacher6 · 84,841
#55
السادس العلمي 2026🕊💚
@stadiraaq · 3,988
#56
" سوادس قلبي "
@Swads_6 · 100,845
#57
شبكة السادسيون التعليمية
@irqed8 · 13,727
#58
دكتور احمد الركابي
@ph_ahmed86 · 5,801
#59
المنقذ للسادس الاعدادي
@almunqidh_lilsaadis · 58,817
#60
السادس علمي - السادس اعدادي
@OD7DO · 17,270
#61
AtHiN a ابن البصرة
@d_tt9 · 3,735
#62
المنقذ في السادس
@SADSHEIB · 16,352
#63
بلاس للتعليم | Al-Plus
@Plus_SADS · 90,245
#64
مَسيرة السَـادس
@O2_six · 7,870
#65
سنتر الملازم | Al-Santer
@santer_malazem · 60,635
#66
قواعد اللغة العربية
@Gr_arab_lang000 · 36,532
#67
الاستاذ عدنان الحسناوي
@AdnanalHasnawi · 3,775
#68
المنقذ في الكيمياء | حسين عقيل صالح
@i7s3ni · 7,585
#69
99.86
@strongzeno · 25,137
#70
ابن النجف
@lreqed · 328,030
#71
ابن تلعفر
@k4kkk · 310,855
#72
سنتر السادس | Al-Santer
@santer_sads · 359,001
#73
المُصْحَف
@lAlMosahfl · 781,717
#74
نجفيون
@njafeoon · 402,653
#75
أَثر •
@ls_xe · 603
#76
ابن النجف
@lreqed1 · 504,544
#77
سنتر الجامعة | Al-Santer
@santer_jamea · 293,220
#78
يَنـــايِرَ.
@AYAT2055 · 1,124
#79
القرأن طريقي🤎🍂
@MV0MV · 39,517
#80
دفعة 25
@mohammed_alobidi · 28,270
#81
قنـاة يُوسف الـجامعيه
@yosef_college · 1,323
#82
واحد عراق
@ONEIQ1 · 368,968
#83
وزارة التربية العراقية
@educationiq · 608,835
#84

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

📚مرشحات ابن كربلاء 📚
@ooiq2 · 100,726
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
مرشحات السادس الابتدائي
@stad0ma · 42,540
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 August 2026
ابن سومر( Ibn Sumer)
@iraqis10 · 52,132
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
ابن النجف
@lreqed · 328,030
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
القرأن طريقي🤎🍂
@MV0MV · 39,517
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
قناة التربوي الاخبارية
@aaer7 · 43,026
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
ابن النجف
@lreqed1 · 504,544
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مرشحات السادس علمي” (@stad6ma), 38,753 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stad6ma.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.