كيف تنضم وقتك لا تعتمد على قوة الإرادة 1️⃣كل مرة تخلي الهاتف يمك وأنت تحاول تقاومه، أنت دا تستخدم انتباهك باتجاهين. لذلك أبعد الهاتف عن مكان الدراسة؛ لأن تقليل المحفز نفسه أسهل من محاولة مقاومته كل دقيقة. 2️⃣ لا تنتقل من ساعتين ريلز إلى 6 ساعات دراسة الدماغ متعود على مكافآت سريعة ومتكررة من الهاتف. ابدأ بفترات دراسة قصيرة وزيدها تدريجيًا حتى يتعود عقلك على التركيز لفترات أطول. 🔄 3️⃣ استخدم الاسترجاع بدل إعادة ا…

Channel
أ. مصطفى النعيمي . فيزياء
@drmustafaphyscis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
45,360subscribers
-117 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001745297700 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drmustafaphyscis |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drmustafaphyscis |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 45,360 | -22 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 45,382 | -41 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 45,423 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 45,435 | -21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 45,456 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 45,469 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 45,477 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.65%
- avg views ÷ 45,360 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,560
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (4 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 33,330 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5m 02s
- Average length
- 1m 00s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
الفصل الاول نركز ع مسائل التوالي والrc والمختلط بالترتيب الفصل الثاني نركز ع مسائل الحث الذاتي والملفان والساق بالترتيب الفصل الثالث الرنين التوازي التوالي بالترتيب
اشاقه راح انزلكم مهمات تقروها
شباب فيزياء مجاي تلم ع دور الثاني🤣
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
جدول امتحانات الدور الثاني
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
الامتحان الشامل الاول الفصل الاول المستعات
https://youtu.be/MqHXQkLBIZY?si=gAgRQRhyR3JqFbik
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @drmustafaphyscis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
فيزياء الدور الثاني ، شتردون ؟
- امتحانات21%
- ملزمة مهمات29%
- كل شي65%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@X4DDD · 218,989
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
@iraqulu · 231,095
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026
@iraqdeu1 · 307,042
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@Plus_SADS · 132,730
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
@dd_nnc · 119,564
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@TeslaAws · 298,560
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 August 2026
@ONEIQ1 · 374,808
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 August 2026
@sajjadobaidy · 215,594
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@IraqEduForum · 236,931
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
@O2_E3 · 144,479
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026
@SadsHelp · 1,043,508
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
@dr_English1 · 337,208
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
@ZTMMS · 119,015
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
@ALSudaneAli · 222,062
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
@Salimalmansour98bio · 264,187
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@H2educ · 175,673
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
@yallandrs · 208,084
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
@Muaid92 · 334,552
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@iraqed8 · 1,432,891
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 August 2026
@hfbioo · 171,907
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
@hayderabdamaa11 · 308,201
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@haiderwaleed · 471,052
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@k4kkk · 349,998
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@iraqmim · 180,117
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أ. مصطفى النعيمي . فيزياء” (@drmustafaphyscis), 45,360 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drmustafaphyscis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.