4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,452–5,467 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 15:08
5,454
-5
10 Aug 2026, 18:31
5,459
-5
7 Aug 2026, 17:30
5,464
-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:17
5,465
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.0%
avg views ÷ 5,454 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,690
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (19 March 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
3,380
Reactions total
97
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,541 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
447
29.0%
👍
324
21.0%
🔥
177
11.5%
💯
161
10.4%
👏
129
8.37%
🙏
98
6.36%
🤨
66
4.28%
😐
42
2.73%
🥰
39
2.53%
😱
29
1.88%
😢
14
0.909%
😎
7
0.454%
🤯
5
0.324%
⚡
1
0.065%
🏆
1
0.065%
👌
1
0.065%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,541reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Why Do We Tolerate The Hypocrisy And 180 Traitors?
The cognitive dissonance required to champion Thomas Massie right now is staggering. These single-issue voters are clutching their pearls over a foreign policy disagreement while ignoring the loaded gun the man is pointing at the entire constitutional republic. Time to rub their noses in the mess they left on the carpet.
The 2020 Denial Tell
Massie stating there w…
Iraq Is Telling You What They Are About To Do:
Currency Overhaul
Monetary Reformaion
Gold Revaluation
Financial Stability
Do You See The Timing?
Do You See The Agenda?
Do You See The Progress?
Redenomination + Revaluation =?
Payday!
The 3 Zero Project Are In-Country Only
Normalization Operation: Testing Testing 123
How can people overlook the notion that about the 4,300 people that will be in attendance at UFC on June 14th will be US Military? The only reason I think this event is being done is to acclimate the minds of the public to get used to seeing the US Military in a more common man/woman type of way due to the extreme nature of what is to come regarding the US Military Tribun…
https://x.com/disclosetv/status/2055093244506091902?s=52
He Is Basically Telling You Inadvertently That He Too Was Also Replaced
Height doesn't lie.
Facial structure doesn't lie.
Eye color/shape doesn't lie.
We Are Surrounded By 2.0s.
A Warm Welcome Or Cold Rejection:
The Civil Rights Act
Roe vs Wade
Gay Marriage Rights
The D. Trump 2016 Election Win
UAP/UFO Disclosure
Nanotechnology/Bio Hacking
Off Planet Civilizations
Etc
We are in a time where change will be so swift people will wake up and think it happened while they were sleeping. But in a metaphorical sense they would be correct when you think about what most are oblivious to today…
The Time Is almost Upon Us:
Iraqi President? Done!
The War With Iran? Done!
Iraqi Prime Minister? Done!
Congrats from POTUS? Done!
KDP & PUK confirm unity? Done!
Gold Backing Demanded by IMF? Done!
Oil Revenue Flow Secured? Done!
Shiite Framework Purged? Done!
Militia Skim Networks Starved? Done!
UAE OPEC Exit Signal Sent? Done!
Militias Hand Over There Weapons? Done!
Iraqi Finance Minister? Pending...
C…
The Bots Are Gone
The Money Is Gone
The Influence Is Gone
So What's Their Next Move?
They are doing this because they all been found out and exposed for who they are. Now they are trying to align directly with Communist/Democrats out of spite and desperation to remain afloat because they have become irrelevant to the side they have infiltrated by soft peddling leftist ideologies that garnered pushback instead of …
Nick Fuentes Connected To SPLC
No Wonder He Is Deemed A Plant
Nick Fuentes,who is a prominent white supremacist, podcaster, and organizer, gained widespread notoriety in 2017 when he attended the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. At the time an 18-year-old freshman at Boston University, Fuentes attended the event to network and participate in what he described as a "white advocate" cause protes…
In the 1960s, the CIA spent years and over $10 million surgically implanting a microphone, transmitter, and antenna into a cat's skull and tail to turn it into a living bugging device. They trained it to sit near targets and eavesdrop. During the first real field test in a park, the cat ignored commands, wandered into traffic, and got hit by a taxi dying instantly. The project was abandoned. Declassified docs confirm…
(MAGA) Why This Is The Most Powerful Force On The Planet
MAGA is not a company.
MAGA is not an organization.
MAGA is not a business.
MAGA is not a club.
MAGA is not a social hub.
MAGA is not a gang.
MAGA is not a website.
MAGA is not a store.
MAGA is not a property.
MAGA is not a pop-up shop.
MAGA is not a political party.
Etc.
This is why it is the most formidable force on the planet. It's shapeless. It…
❤57💯30🔥4🏆1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Prolotario1real. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,332,491 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Q) The Storm Rider /Official Page @qthestormrider777 · 158,046 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
Julian Assange @JulianAssangeWiki · 163,809 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 August 2026
Shadow of Ezra @ShadowofEzra · 148,933 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
il Donaldo Trumpo @RealDonaldoTrumpo · 158,185 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ariel” (@Prolotario1real), 5,454 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Prolotario1real.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.