⚡ Sponsored by Thunderpick | The World’s #1 Casino
🚀 Самый популярный канал по подаркам
20.000$ Розыгрыш SOOOOOOOOOOOOON!
Получить подарок: @alexzackermanROBOT
Чат Дурова: @PodarokDurovaChat
Подарочник: @ALEXZACKERMAN
По рекламе/Ads: @GLAVBUHTELEGRAM
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net -15,636. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 151,876–172,202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 20:20
154,221
-1,971
19 Sept 2026, 03:56
156,192
-736
16 Sept 2026, 15:38
156,928
+716
14 Sept 2026, 17:58
156,212
-657
13 Sept 2026, 01:39
156,869
-509
11 Sept 2026, 05:39
157,378
-874
8 Sept 2026, 08:59
158,252
-1,104
5 Sept 2026, 02:22
159,356
-573
3 Sept 2026, 10:22
159,929
-417
2 Sept 2026, 01:32
160,346
-367
31 Aug 2026, 22:25
160,713
-384
30 Aug 2026, 22:15
161,097
-366
29 Aug 2026, 21:15
161,463
-314
28 Aug 2026, 22:15
161,777
-341
28 Aug 2026, 01:46
162,118
-213
27 Aug 2026, 04:57
162,331
-200
26 Aug 2026, 08:05
162,531
-389
25 Aug 2026, 05:08
162,920
-323
24 Aug 2026, 05:24
163,243
-682
22 Aug 2026, 12:22
163,925
first reading
Engagement
244 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 118 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 154,221 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,400
119 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.964%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
119
of 244 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held
244 (3 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total
1,948,800
Reactions total
18,788
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 22:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,710
Videos
≈808
Links
≈6,740
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 09s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
41,599 reactions across 239 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
17,747
42.7%
🌚
17,387
41.8%
💯
3,645
8.76%
custom 5474417542283948658
1,886
4.53%
💩
934
2.25%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 244 of the 244 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42,447 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 244 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3,684
across the posts below
Posts paid on
236
of 244 we hold a reading for · 97%
Most on one post
2,010
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PodarokDurova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 244 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😂 САМЫЙ СМЕШНОЙ СКАМ НА КУБОК?
Вчера к олимпиаднику с 🎁 Кубком обратился честный покупатель и хотел купить его за реальную стоимость...
Но олимпиадник по итогу заскамил его на 100 ⭐️ — под предлогом, что у него не было звезд на передачу.
🤡 Но уже сегодня олимпиаднику написал скамер, кинул ему фейковые 5701 USDT, и он передал ему свой Кубок...
карма?
❤️ - да
🌚 - олимпиада по умности
Чат ⭐️ Funpay - купить звёзды…
❌ БАН ВАШЕЙ КРИПТЫ ИЗ-ЗА САНКЦИЙ!
Биржа Bybit опубликовала список контрагентов (обменников, сервисов и др.) — за использование которых вашу крипту заблокируют навсегда!
🥹 Список огромен, и среди популярных сервисов — Payeer, EXMO, Garantex, Grinex, Bitpapa, Rapira, HTX и другие.
Причина — санкции: если ваша крипта хоть раз прошла через эти сервисы, она становится «грязной» и биржа — а в будущем скорее всего и друг…
❗️ WALLET — ТЕПЕРЬ WALT!
Сегодня пропала вкладка с официальным Telegram-кошельком Wallet — это место займёт 💎 GRAM Wallet!
🥶 А прямо сейчас они объявили о ребрендинге — название сменилось на Walt и изменился логотип!
грам валлет выходи?
❤️ - давно пора
🌚 - грам валлет это миф
Чат ⭐️ Funpay - купить звёзды ⭐️
⚡ Sponsored by Thunderpick | The World’s #1 Casino.
🔼 КУПИЛИ ПЕПУ ЗА $230 000!
Только что была продана 🎁 Plush Pepe за 139 464 💎 ($230 000) — ещё в январе её покупали за $158 000!
началась бычка?
❤️ - да
🌚 - не
Чат ⭐️ Funpay - купить звёзды ⭐️
⚡ Sponsored by Thunderpick | The World’s #1 Casino.
🔥 Первая крупная сделка в GDomains: prem.tg продан за 1 900 GRAM (2500$)
Рынок красивых .tg-имен переходит от регистраций к реальным торгам. 1 сентября была зафиксирована первая публичная сделка: домен prem.tg нашел нового владельца по прямому офферу на Getgems.
🧾 Детали сделки: покупатель забрал NFT-сертификат владения под запуск собственного проекта, а мы обеспечили полную передачу прав на доменное имя.
1️⃣ Что …
🤑 ЗОЛОТАЯ КОЛЛЕКЦИЯ ПОДАРКОВ ЗА $1 ЛЯМ?
@bIackkro собрал золотую коллекцию из 204 подарков на чёрном фоне и, по его словам, не собирается продавать её дешевле $1 млн!
стоит таких денег?
❤️ - да
🌚 - пусть мне кидает и расход
Чат ⭐️ Funpay - купить звёзды ⭐️
⚡ Sponsored by Thunderpick | The World’s #1 Casino.
😱 СКАМ СХЕМА ЧЕРЕЗ QR-КОД!
Появилась новая схема скама на гифты через QR-код от Tonkeeper!
📍Скамер пишет с просьбой продать гифты или за услугой — которую готов оплатить вперёд
📍 Но говорит что не хватает копейки на комиссию в сети — и просит их у вас
📍 Кидает QR-код от Tonkeeper — вы думаете что это обычный перевод
📍 Сканируете его и подтверждаете контракт на выставление ваших подарков на аукцион — все деньги у…
☄️ НОВЫЕ УЛУЧШЕНИЯ БУДУТ УНИКАЛЬНЫМИ?
Идейный аниматор из команды Telegram заявил, что предложил в качестве нескольких улучшений уникальные скины — которых до этого не было!
😱 По его словам это будет некий «новый стиль»!
ждем имбу?
❤️ - да
🌚 - надеюсь не огорчат
Чат ⭐️ Funpay - купить звёзды ⭐️
⚡ Sponsored by Thunderpick | The World’s #1 Casino.
🔼 ПАМП РУЧЕК В 3 РАЗА!
После пампа яиц 🎁🎁 Фаберже начали пампить схожую по тематике Ручку — 🎁 Royal Ink!
😳 Меньше чем за сутки цену подняли с $14 до $47 — рост на 236% или в 3.4x!
полетит выше?
❤️ - да
🌚 - не думаю
Чат ⭐️ Funpay - купить звёзды ⭐️
⚡ Sponsored by Thunderpick | The World’s #1 Casino.
☄️ СХЕМА СКАМА С СЕССИЯМИ ОТ МАРКЕТОВ!
Началось всё с того, что челу предложили зарекламить сервер Minecraft и кинули моды — он скачал их, и вместе с ними украли сессию Telegram и сессию от MRKT!
🧐 Жертва заметила это и сбросила сессии (только в тг), думая что всё обошлось — но спустя день левый чел пишет с просьбой продать подарки и для усыпления внимания даже покупает 🎁 Персик за оверпрайс.
Поверив ему бедолага …
😱 ШКОЛЬНИКИ АТАКУЮТ ДЕВОЧЕК РАДИ ПОДАРКОВ!
Сообщается, что группа школьников устраивает охоту на девочек с NFT-гифтами — находят её, пробивают через ботов ФИО и требуют отдать подарки...
😱 Если не идёт на поводу — начинают травить, писать родителям, клеветать. Если и это не помогает — травля переходит в офлайн: видео под дверью квартиры и прочие угрозы.
На данный момент аккаунты и канал мошенников заблокированы и …
❤135🌚54💯23
Showing the 12 most recent of 244 posts we hold for @PodarokDurova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@PodarokDurova edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Insider Alpha Hunter @AlphaHuntIns · 94,764 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
DARKWING DUCK @bunnnycrypto · 33,341 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 September 2026
Дело в TON @delo_vton · 47,130 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Подарок Дурова” (@PodarokDurova), 154,221 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PodarokDurova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.