🌚

Channel
White | Sex Coach
@WhiteNDAofficial
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
172,247subscribers
+5,902 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003819466866 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WhiteNDAofficial |
| Created | 5 February 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WhiteNDAofficial |
Topic
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 23:55 | 172,247 | -1,022 |
| 11 Nov 2026, 03:06 | 173,269 | -712 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 08:15 | 173,981 | -465 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 23:15 | 174,446 | -653 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:46 | 175,099 | -401 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:17 | 175,500 | -532 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:29 | 176,032 | -781 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:58 | 176,813 | -636 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:08 | 177,449 | -520 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:07 | 177,969 | -819 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:28 | 178,788 | +288 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:29 | 178,500 | -1,824 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:51 | 180,324 | -860 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:41 | 181,184 | +122 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:07 | 181,062 | +2,061 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:27 | 179,001 | -622 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:10 | 179,623 | -759 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:25 | 180,382 | -364 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:50 | 180,746 | -402 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:50 | 181,148 | first reading |
Engagement
78 posts held, back to 5 February 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 202 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.19%
- avg views ÷ 172,247 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,220
- 63 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 64
- of 78 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 42 of 63 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 78 (5 February 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 454,580 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 17:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 38s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1,079
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 50
- of 73 we hold a reading for · 68%
- Most on one post
- 176
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @WhiteNDAofficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 78 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 February 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 64 posts held from the last 30 days (17.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
СВОБОДА СВОБОДНОГО ИНТЕРНЕТА? Увидел новости о том, что боты для поиска владельцев NFT-подарков были заблокированы. И вот мне интересно, @monk, ты за такую свободу боролся? Ещё совсем недавно этот функционал был официально доступен в Telegram. Но стоило его убрать, как люди, предоставлявшие аналогичные возможности, внезапно оказались под ударом. А что, собственно, они сделали плохого? Они собирали публично досту…
Giveaway coming 🌚🌚🌚 Invite friends
Pins Holders @pinclubbot Холдеры самолетиков @pinclubbot
🎁 Pins Coming. Wait insights.
The end? 🌚 @surfer => @orgazm => @narcissist => @monk Or no? @durov
@smash_direct => @surfer https://t.me/yovssmash
#2013 🚀 @zebatuq => @whoiam https://t.me/zebapotamus
Black 🍆 за #2013 @testrest => @zebatuq https://t.me/testrest444
#2013 за #1 😎 Собака продолжает странствие @imJordanBeIfort => @testrest https://t.me/its_StrattonOakmont
Now imagine if Durov actually joined the challenge and passed the mask on to someone else. 🌚 А представьте Дуров примет челлендж и передаст другому? 🌚
Lucha => @imJordanBeIfort https://t.me/its_StrattonOakmont https://t.me/nft/ResistanceDog-2013
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @WhiteNDAofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @WhiteNDAofficial as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 13 October 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 15 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 6 months
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@plugs · 6,1984 postsWe Want You ( Giveaway )
@WeWantYouGuys · 6,8103 postsРозыгрыши Telegram Stars
@freetstars · 19,3063 postsGifts Zone | Giveaways
@GftZon · 6,1332 postsstar giveaway
@pemium_gift_giweaway · 2412 postsРаздатчик
@razdat4ik · 1,6942 postsРозыгрыши со всего тг 🎁
@FreePremGift · 3591 postTelegram Stars Giveaway
@FreeTGstarsGiveaway · 6,2311 postDaily Giveaways Activity
@FutureDapp · 2791 postGiveaway Hub
@GiveawayHub4 · 3741 post𝐍𝐅𝐓 | 𝐒𝐀𝐌𝐢
@NFT_SAMi · 3,7871 postPremium Boxes | NFT |Gift گیفت | قرعه کشی
@Premiumboxes · 1,9011 postTelegram stars✨
@Prizesstarss · 7,6271 postㅤStar Hub • Звездный Хаб
@StarHube · 6,0131 postTelegram Stars Giveaway✨
@StarsGiveawayHub · 6,7391 postW — значит White
@WhiteNewsNDA · 694,1641 postStars giveaway
@almoqawema1 · 16,4051 postسحب تلجرام مميز مجاناََ
@free_telegram_gift · 4,6031 postTelegram Star Giveaway
@freetgstar_giveways · 791 postGIVEAWAYADS • FREE REPOST
@giveawayads · 5,7041 postMr Giveaway | مستر گیواوی
@giveawaypremimum · 15,7361 postGiveaways - Premium & Stars 🎁️
@giveaways_premium_stars · 10,1301 postᬉ𝑆𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘸𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘺 𝑆ℎ𝑜𝑝
@lpremiiuml · 4,7261 postTelegram premium giveaway مسابقات تلجرام مدفوع
@premmium_giveaway · 7,0971 postРозыгрыши Telegram Premium
@premtgclub · 7,1891 postРозыгрыши Telegram Premium Stars
@razdacha_TelegramPremium · 206,7341 postTelegram Stars | Розыгрыши звёзд
@rozygrysh_zvezd · 1511 postTon Drops Me Stars Telegram
@ton_drops_me_stars · 9,6591 postWeWantYou
@we_want_you_give · 3,6321 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@luchathoughts · 10,7474 postsНЕКСТ ПОРТАЛ
@nextg1fts · 34 postsКрипта Скруджа ⚡️
@crypta · 496,5512 posts🔥Крипта и Шарж
@cryptocharj · 28,2702 postsLaLYoU
@lalyounft · 119,3682 postsmrgriboss • -300000$ в gift
@mrgriboss · 88,6022 postsNFT 13
@nft13onton · 76,6502 postsnick
@nick_gifts · 2,0472 postsПодарок Дурова
@PodarokDurova · 170,2972 posts𝐒𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐞
@soulmere_channel · 28,7022 posts#sun
@sungiveaway · 38,1592 postsAlex TON
@Alex_TON17 · 69,5211 postCreepy Gifts
@CreepyGifts · 68,3291 postОчки Дурова
@durovessunglasses · 55,9881 postЛудка Fastera 777 - НФТ
@fasterstarsss · 6351 postХижина Глома
@gloom_hut · 58,1181 postInsider
@InsiderT0N · 117,7011 postlans 💣
@lansgifts · 55,4461 postmacan.ton
@macan_all · 74,9291 postSalomol Crypto
@salomol_crypto · 33,4401 postПереходник
@vices · 2491 postВИШНЯ
@vishnyaNFT · 59,1651 postW — значит White
@WhiteNewsNDA · 694,1641 postПОРТАЛ
@yanlin_darit · 621 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@its_StrattonOakmont · 42,0732 postsЮЗЫ МЕДИЙЕК
@ktr101 · 352 posts1,000 NFT • White
@NFT1000WHITE · 8,0682 postsPavel Durov
@durov · 10,021,6051 postПодарки от Скруджа
@GIFT_PODARKI · 132,7551 post@plug’s cooks 🔌
@plugs · 6,1981 postPortals Market
@portals · 443,6401 postPortals Community
@portals_community · 697,2161 postSavin Gift
@savin_gift · 117,7191 postYO vs Smash
@yovssmash · 37,1721 postZebapotamus
@zebapotamus · 7,5631 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“White | Sex Coach” (@WhiteNDAofficial), 172,247 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WhiteNDAofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.